- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michael Sussmann Pleads Guilty in Yet-Unknown SEALED Case
Posted on 4/7/22 at 8:45 am to upgrayedd
Posted on 4/7/22 at 8:45 am to upgrayedd
quote:
You're the king of falling for this horseshite
You're welcome to refute the information presented.
Here's the docket: dEbOOnK away.
3
Posted on 4/7/22 at 8:47 am to VoxDawg
You know he won't.
Posted on 4/7/22 at 8:59 am to VoxDawg
From your link to the the DawsonSField Twitter account:
Here’s the Mariposa Castro docket entry:
LINK
Looks like our docket entry.
quote:
While the Error report on Sussmann's page says it is the wrong case, it does not say it is the wrong defendant. But a new order on the transcript of defendant Mariposa Castro has been posted that may be the transcript that may have been posted in error on Sussmann's case.
Here’s the Mariposa Castro docket entry:
quote:
TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING HEARING in case as to MARIPOSA CASTRO before Judge Reggie B. Walton held on February 23, 2022; Page Numbers: 1-46. Date of Issuance:April 6, 2022. Court Reporter/Transcriber Lisa A. Moreira, RDR, CRR, Telephone number (202) 354-3187, Transcripts may be ordered by submitting the Transcript Order FormFor the first 90 days after this filing date, the transcript may be viewed at the courthouse at a public termina l or purchased from the court reporter referenced above. After 90 days, the transcript may be accessed via PACER. Other transcript formats, (multi-page, condensed, CD or ASCII) may be purchased from the court reporter.NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have twenty-one days to file with the court and the court reporter any request to redact personal identifiers from this transcript. If no such requests are filed, the transcript will be made available to the public via PACER without redaction after 90 days. The policy, which includes the five personal identifiers specifically covered, is located on our website at www.dcd.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 4/27/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/7/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/5/2022.(Moreira, Lisa) (Entered: 04/06/2022)
LINK
Looks like our docket entry.
This post was edited on 4/7/22 at 9:00 am
Posted on 4/7/22 at 9:15 am to VoxDawg
Glancing over a few of the attachments (at least those parts not redacted) leads me to think Durham has gone deep and hard on this.
NY Post has a good take on this.
NY Post has a good take on this.
quote:
A researcher tasked by tech executive Rodney Joffe with mining internet data to create a “narrative” of Trump-Russia collusion expressed doubt about the Hillary Clinton campaign project in an August 2016 email cited by Special Counsel John Durham — writing at one point, “This will not fly,” according to court documents.
The message emerged in an explosive motion filed late Monday, in which Durham alleged that Joffe, Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, and attorney Michael Sussmann took part in a “joint venture” to gather and spread damaging information about then-Republican nominee Donald Trump.
quote:
According to prosecutors, Joffe told his subordinates that “VIPs” — a phrase Durham says refers to Sussmann, Clinton campaign general counsel Marc Elias, and the campaign itself — were “looking for a true story that could be used as the basis for closer examination.”
“Trump has claimed he and his company have had NO dealings with .ru [web domains] other than the failed Casino, and the Miss universe [sic] pageant,” Joffe allegedly wrote. “He claims absolutely NO interaction with any financial institutions. So any potential like that would be jackpot.”
quote:
“[Y]ou do realize that we will have to expose every trick we have in our bag to even make a very weak association?” wrote the person, identified only as Researcher-1. ” … [U]nless we get … traffic collected at critical points between suspect organizations, we cannot technically make any claims that would fly public scrutiny.”
“In this case we will have not only the Trump folks trying to sho[o]t this down, but all the privacy freaks trying to come up with a crazy conspiracy theory on how we obtain the data,” the researcher added. “Sorry to say this, we are nowhere close coming with a plan to attack this problem that will fly in the public domain. The only thing that drive us at this point is that we just do not like [Trump]. This will not fly in eyes of public scrutiny. Folks, I am afraid we have tunnel vision.”
This post was edited on 4/7/22 at 9:52 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News