Started By
Message

re: Thoughts on the RaDonda Vaught (nurse convicted of negligent homicide) trial?

Posted on 3/29/22 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Help me understand this. You are concerned that people can and are being charged with criminal activity when they make a mistake that has dire consequences?


Criminal negligence charges should be used in cases where a potentially dangerous situation was known about, but left uncorrected resulting in injury or death. As the other poster said there are other methods to discipline those that had no intent to harm, but made a mistake. Revocation of professional license, civil lawsuits, etc. The punishment should be based on the intent of the action not the result.
This post was edited on 3/29/22 at 12:42 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96699 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 12:45 pm to
The prosecution comparing this to drunk driving is absurd. A drunk driver chose to drink, and then got behind a vehicle. That is knowingly putting someone in danger

The equivalent here is someone running a red light, and then saying they truly thought it was green. Would that person go to prison? I truly doubt it. They would be civilly liable and have other troubles like loss of license etc. Same that should have been done to this nurse
This post was edited on 3/29/22 at 12:46 pm
Posted by Vamos Brandonos
Member since Mar 2022
1021 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Criminal negligence charges should be used in cases where a potentially dangerous situation was known about, but left uncorrected resulting in injury or death. As the other poster said there are other methods to discipline those that had no intent to harm, but made a mistake. Revocation of professional license, civil lawsuits, etc.


Why should intent matter? A person could know about a dangerous situation, have no intent to harm, but could be lazy, careless, or just unqualified to do what they are doing. I don't care about their intent when multiple safeguards are missed. Part of punishment has and should be to discourage others to do the same, and in cases like this, encourage carefulness and diligence. Revoking a license is a slap on the wrist and does not send the same message.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20638 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Criminal negligence charges should be used in cases where a potentially dangerous situation was known about, but left uncorrected resulting in injury or death. As the other poster said there are other methods to discipline those that had no intent to harm, but made a mistake. Revocation of professional license, civil lawsuits, etc. The punishment should be based on the intent of the action not the result.


But was that not the case here? Honestly don't know?

It seems to me that there were two major issues, please correct me if I'm wrong?

1.) Nurse egregiously searched, found, and administered the wrong drug. IMO she made two horrible errors here. One was pulling the wrong drug and assuming they were the same. Who the hell does that? Then the second was administering the wrong drug without asking someone first to confirm?

2.) Nurse failed to monitor the situation?

From the docs and RN's here, some are saying that if she was properly monitored and it was caught right away she may have lived? How quickly would it have been caught?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram