- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tractor Tranny's... Standard Vs. Hydro
Posted on 3/23/22 at 10:47 am to southern686
Posted on 3/23/22 at 10:47 am to southern686
quote:
Both have their pro's and con's. It really depends what your intended and primary use of the tractor is for.
Basically, scraping (dragging) dirt and gravel... it is being used to build an RV park.... I have a Kubota l2350 but it's not 4 wd and it needs to be.
3
Posted on 3/23/22 at 10:57 am to WWII Collector
Loader + Hydro = Heaven
As far as lugging with a hydro, use the proper range to keep the fluid temps down.
As far as lugging with a hydro, use the proper range to keep the fluid temps down.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 8:53 am to WWII Collector
quote:
it is being used to build an RV park
Congrats on the retirement plan. This is my dream also.
I prefer gears and definitely 4x4. Hydro certainly has it's advantages though.
Posted on 3/28/22 at 12:08 am to WWII Collector
For what you say your intended use is,hydrostatic and it’s not even close. I’ve had a manual clutch shift John Deere for 17 years. Bought a MX6000 Kubota last year and for spreading dirt and grading gravel they hydro is so much more convenient
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News