Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

does scott still win the heisman

Posted on 10/11/08 at 10:09 pm
Posted by tigermike200444
baton rouge
Member since Dec 2003
9106 posts
Posted on 10/11/08 at 10:09 pm
Posted by MSG
B.R.
Member since Dec 2007
11264 posts
Posted on 10/11/08 at 10:13 pm to
yes.... by a narrow margin
Posted by SOCAL TIGER
SOCAL
Member since Jan 2005
11299 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 1:10 am to
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Posted by TigerGold4
Member since Sep 2008
452 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 9:35 am to
It was an uphill battle in the first place. Now he has to average 300yds/game with 30 more tds and he might have a shot.
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
14804 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 9:48 am to
wendy's high school heisman
Posted by TigerGold4
Member since Sep 2008
452 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 9:56 am to
haha man that's funny
Posted by HeadBusta4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
11362 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 10:23 am to
nope
Posted by tigeronthebayou
Raceland
Member since Oct 2007
149 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 7:00 pm to
He never was going to win it...
Posted by G8TRGRT
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
774 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 7:53 pm to
You guys are kidding right. Scott never should have been mentioned in the first place.
Posted by STMtiger
Hub City
Member since Feb 2008
4755 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 7:58 pm to
he has 0% chance of winning
Posted by Hideo Nomo
Put up both hands, drop one thumb
Member since Apr 2008
7457 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

You guys are kidding right. Scott never should have been mentioned in the first place.


Yeah, it's not like he had impressive performances or anything. The guy could've been a contender if our o-line would've been able to do anything against UF.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 8:21 pm to
You would think a 36 year old man would have something more productive to do than flame a message board.
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
32776 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

You guys are kidding right. Scott never should have been mentioned in the first place.



:fail:


e led the SEC in rushing going into the game. He looked AMAZING. WTF is so crazy about believeing he WAS a heisman candidate?


Please, enlighten me on what you saw going into the game which led you to believe he wasn't a good RB?
Posted by Cody101786
Gray
Member since Jan 2005
1748 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 8:27 pm to
Scott is a better pure running back then anyone Florida has.
Posted by moock blackjack
Member since Apr 2008
110573 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 8:51 pm to
Never was going to have a realistic chance and now it is no chance :beatdeadhorse:



Posted by tigermike200444
baton rouge
Member since Dec 2003
9106 posts
Posted on 10/12/08 at 9:59 pm to
when i seen the fumble.i was like oh no.he had already been fighting for all his yards.
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
23799 posts
Posted on 10/13/08 at 11:33 am to
Posted by Brageous
Member since Jul 2008
107724 posts
Posted on 10/13/08 at 11:47 am to
Posted by Miles Fan Now
All ovah da place
Member since Mar 2008
833 posts
Posted on 10/13/08 at 11:49 am to
A 36 Financial rep. spending his time on LSU boards talking about our RB, that's who I want to get advice from (I don't care if it was at 8 pm on a Sun night OR NOT).

Let me translate---get a fricking life a-hole!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram