- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clarence Thomas Issues Warning About The Supreme Court
Posted on 3/14/22 at 4:12 pm to Lucius Clay
Posted on 3/14/22 at 4:12 pm to Lucius Clay
quote:
You also shouldn't cavalierly refuse to allow a President to make an appointment (see Obama/Garland) and then allow it under the same circumstances (see Trump/Barrett), for purely political reasons. But Thomas apparently didn't complain about that hypocrisy.
On what planet did Thomas or even SCOTUS "allow" or not allow those things to happen?
Besides, you can pretend that the circumstances were the exact same--but they factually were not. If the Democrats would have had their current numbers in the Senate in fall 2020, Barrett would not be on the Court.
This post was edited on 3/14/22 at 4:13 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News