Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 12/22/22 at 8:59 am to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64963 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Range is the big issue with tank rounds vs artillery rounds


Well you’re comparing apples to oranges here. Tanks have a far different battlefield role than artillery. Tanks are a direct fire weapons system meant for the front line in direct contact with the enemy. Artillery is indirect fire weapons meant to be miles behind the line and not in direct contact with enemy forces. Artillery does have direct fire capability. But it’s only meant for last resort defense if enemy forces have broken though the front and the artillery unit doesn’t have time to bug out.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
18020 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:17 am to
quote:

Well you’re comparing apples to oranges here. Tanks have a far different battlefield role than artillery. Tanks are a direct fire weapons system meant for the front line in direct contact with the enemy. Artillery is indirect fire weapons meant to be miles behind the line and not in direct contact with enemy forces. Artillery does have direct fire capability. But it’s only meant for last resort defense if enemy forces have broken though the front and the artillery unit doesn’t have time to bug out.



We're having this discussion because of reports that Russian forces are running low on artillery shells and are using dug-in tanks as a substitute way of hitting Ukrainians with indirect fire.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9721 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Well you’re comparing apples to oranges here. Tanks have a far different battlefield role than artillery. Tanks are a direct fire weapons system meant for the front line in direct contact with the enemy. Artillery is indirect fire weapons meant to be miles behind the line and not in direct contact with enemy forces. Artillery does have direct fire capability. But it’s only meant for last resort defense if enemy forces have broken though the front and the artillery unit doesn’t have time to bug out.



the discussion was about using tanks as artillery which Russia has in fact done.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35532 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Range is the big issue with tank rounds vs artillery rounds


Well you’re comparing apples to oranges here. Tanks have a far different battlefield role than artillery. Tanks are a direct fire weapons system meant for the front line in direct contact with the enemy. Artillery is indirect fire weapons meant to be miles behind the line and not in direct contact with enemy forces. Artillery does have direct fire capability. But it’s only meant for last resort defense if enemy forces have broken though the front and the artillery unit doesn’t have time to bug out.
You seem to have missed his original point, which was that tanks are being used as a replacement for artillery.

eta- nvm, addressed a few posts later
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 11:41 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram