- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:48 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:48 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
If they attack a member of NATO. I’ve said this is my line multiple times today.
So after they control 20-25% of grain exports globally and 60%+ of global uranium mining on top of the O&G they export to exert control over Europe. They could just turn Europe damn near completely off if they controlled Kazakhstan’s uranium in addition to their O&G.
What do you suspect happens if the EU went dark?
quote:
The difference is Hitler had a book that directly told you everything he was going to do. Putin’s plans are way more simple and far less genocidal than Hitler’s vision.
Putin is following Russia’s historical playbook. Decently easy to telegraph his intentions.
quote:
I don’t know but your point “Yeah we’ve spent less in four months than we did in 45 years.” Yeah it better be, or else I’m going to get way more pissed.
Yet we’ve caused more direct damage to their traditional fighting capacity via arming & advising Ukraine than we did literally just trying to outspend them for 45 years. We’ve spent 75 years treating Russia as our greatest geopolitical threat and near peer and in 4 months and a tiny fraction of what we’ve spent over the last 75 years under this belief and driving defense policy we’ve shown the world they’re a large NK. That’s quite the bang for your buck in 4 months vs 75 years prior of foreign policy that still had the world fearful of Russias military prowess.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:56 pm to DabosDynasty
quote:
So after they control 20-25% of grain exports globally and 60%+ of global uranium mining on top of the O&G they export to exert control over Europe. They could just turn Europe damn near completely off if they controlled Kazakhstan’s uranium in addition to their O&G.
What do you suspect happens if the EU went dark?
For y’all, I don’t know. But for me:
quote:
Yet we’ve caused more direct damage to their traditional fighting capacity via arming & advising Ukraine than we did literally just trying to outspend them for 45 years. We’ve spent 75 years treating Russia as our greatest geopolitical threat and near peer and in 4 months and a tiny fraction of what we’ve spent over the last 75 years under this belief and driving defense policy we’ve shown the world they’re a large NK. That’s quite the bang for your buck in 4 months vs 75 years prior of foreign policy that still had the world fearful of Russias military prowess.
A lot of gibberish to defend your bullshite.
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 10:57 pm
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:02 pm to DabosDynasty
When Russia wins, it will severely diminish our prestige, and it will harm NATOs credibility.
We will be called weak.
China will test us.
We will be called weak.
China will test us.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News