Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:48 pm to
Posted by DabosDynasty
Member since Apr 2017
5179 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

If they attack a member of NATO. I’ve said this is my line multiple times today.


So after they control 20-25% of grain exports globally and 60%+ of global uranium mining on top of the O&G they export to exert control over Europe. They could just turn Europe damn near completely off if they controlled Kazakhstan’s uranium in addition to their O&G.

What do you suspect happens if the EU went dark?

quote:

The difference is Hitler had a book that directly told you everything he was going to do. Putin’s plans are way more simple and far less genocidal than Hitler’s vision.


Putin is following Russia’s historical playbook. Decently easy to telegraph his intentions.

quote:

I don’t know but your point “Yeah we’ve spent less in four months than we did in 45 years.” Yeah it better be, or else I’m going to get way more pissed.


Yet we’ve caused more direct damage to their traditional fighting capacity via arming & advising Ukraine than we did literally just trying to outspend them for 45 years. We’ve spent 75 years treating Russia as our greatest geopolitical threat and near peer and in 4 months and a tiny fraction of what we’ve spent over the last 75 years under this belief and driving defense policy we’ve shown the world they’re a large NK. That’s quite the bang for your buck in 4 months vs 75 years prior of foreign policy that still had the world fearful of Russias military prowess.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109076 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

So after they control 20-25% of grain exports globally and 60%+ of global uranium mining on top of the O&G they export to exert control over Europe. They could just turn Europe damn near completely off if they controlled Kazakhstan’s uranium in addition to their O&G.

What do you suspect happens if the EU went dark?


For y’all, I don’t know. But for me:



quote:

Yet we’ve caused more direct damage to their traditional fighting capacity via arming & advising Ukraine than we did literally just trying to outspend them for 45 years. We’ve spent 75 years treating Russia as our greatest geopolitical threat and near peer and in 4 months and a tiny fraction of what we’ve spent over the last 75 years under this belief and driving defense policy we’ve shown the world they’re a large NK. That’s quite the bang for your buck in 4 months vs 75 years prior of foreign policy that still had the world fearful of Russias military prowess.


A lot of gibberish to defend your bullshite.
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 10:57 pm
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19402 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:02 pm to
When Russia wins, it will severely diminish our prestige, and it will harm NATOs credibility.

We will be called weak.

China will test us.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram