- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The conspiracy theory that the jab effects menstrual cycles turns out to be true.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:10 pm to LSUAngelHere1
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:10 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:Where? Yes, I am sure some doctors said that. There are over a million doctors out there . But where are the doctors you quoted saying that?
While ignoring the doctors quoted calling it a rumor, misinformed and myths.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:11 pm to TaderSalad
quote:
See current infertility rates versus decades ago.
Infertility rates? Can you link me data specifically to rates of infertility? Because I think I know what you mean, but fertility rates are absolutely not linked to increased numbers of vaccinations.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:16 pm to lsupride87
quote:
What does the vaccine have to do with those women?
When women who have been regular for 15 yrs and then their cycle goes haywire after the jab, won’t stop bleeding or suddenly stop and go into menopause.
Ray Charles could see this has everything to do with the injection.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:17 pm to crazy4lsu
Also, I love how this is being left out
From the leading researcher in the study being talked about
From the leading researcher in the study being talked about
quote:Kinda burying the lead…..I’ll just assume it was an oversight and accidental the PT took this and ran with it to infertility and hysterectomies….
One of the first studies to track whether COVID-19 vaccination might affect periods found a small and temporary change.
Research published last Wednesday tracked nearly 4,000 U.S. women through six menstrual cycles and on average, the next period after a shot started about a day later than usual. But there was no change in the number of days of menstrual bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination.
"This is incredibly reassuring," said Dr. Alison Edelmanof Oregon Health & Science University, who led the research and said it's important to tell vaccine recipients what to expect.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:18 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Where? Yes, I am sure some doctors said that. There are over a million doctors out there . But where are the doctors you quoted saying that?
Go back and read.... I don’t know how you conveniently missed the bold type.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:19 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
When women who have been regular for 15 yrs and then their cycle goes haywire after the jab, won’t stop bleeding or suddenly stop and go into menopause.
Can you link some case reports?
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:19 pm to LSUAngelHere1
Bat signal must have gone out. Your thread is about to be derailed.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:20 pm to LSUAngelHere1
By all means inject all women of childbearing age with this experimental drug.
Great fricking idea.
Great fricking idea.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:22 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Kinda burying the lead…..I’ll just assume it was an oversight and accidental the PT took this and ran with it to infertility and hysterectomies….
I said women are in the comments and very pissed off calling this article bs bc it is downplaying the number of women affected and the issues that range from irregular cycles, constant bleeding, early menopause , endometriosis coming back worse than ever, clots bigger than silver dollars, hysterectomies, etc
These are NOT women you can dismiss as anti-vax loons. These are women who believed it was safe and now it’s too late.
First they denied it, now they claim it’s just small percentage.... I guess next year we’ll finally get an article with the real numbers.
This post was edited on 1/17/22 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:24 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:So you want to post this research on this board and use this study, but at the same time you want to say frick the results of this study. You are in an interesting postion
I said women are in the comments and very pissed off calling this article bs bc it is downplaying the number of women affected and the issues that range from irregular cycles, constant bleeding, early menopause , endometriosis coming back worse than ever, clots bigger than silver dollars, hysterectomies, etc
These are NOT woman you can dismiss as anti-vax loons. These are women who believed it was safe and now it’s too late.
First they denied it, now they claim it’s just small percentage.... I guess next year we’ll finally get an article with the real numbers.
This post was edited on 1/17/22 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:28 pm to TaderSalad
quote:
Depopulation via infertility. The true damage of these jabs won’t be known for several decades.
True -- the true damage (and extent of damage) might not be known for Decades/Generations.
"Infertility" isn't a "bug" but one of several emerging "features" of the Vaxx -- "Insurance" for the PTB demonic wet-dream of weakening the DNA of "Useless-Eater" survivors of what IS confirmed: Their De-Pop Agenda.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:35 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Can you link some case reports?
“There was a very large FB group full of women with menstrual problems (think like almost 100k) and FB took it down because they care. ?? Women who were in menopause had their periods again.
Stop gaslighting injuries!”
“ Women in menopause 5, 14, 29 years now bleeding. Some childbearing aged women with no periods for months, others continuous bleeding for months, clots, hemorrhaging... these are not “minor” issues!! Check out the comments from another post on this same topic! Too many women with big problems for them to brush this aside! So glad they’re going to study it after the fact!”
“That explains a lot. I've been wondering why my menstrual cycle has been all over the charts. I thought it was because of being around so many women in cosmetology school and cycles linking up, but it being the vaccine seems much more plausible ?? also my mother is having issues as she's been menopausal for many years now and she too, has been having random bleeding. This is definitely a cause for concern.”
“They are lying. I know two women who had the vaccines and continuously bled heavy, severe cramping. One had to have her uterus cauterized and had to have her tubes tied to avoid a tubal pregnancy after the proceedure. The other still has severe cramping and bleeding. Neither women had any problems like this before the vaccinations. They are not the only ones having female problems since vaccinations. They minimize the side effects of these vaccinations but people are having severe and life changing side effects.“
“I know 2 that needed hysterectomies.”
“So is mine my period is lasting at least 2 months at a time and it’s heavy it stops for 2 weeks and then it’s back again.”
“Janet, thank you for thinking of me! you know I’ve often wondered if this is what was the root of my problems. If it is though I would hardly say the damage is MINIMAL and TEMPORARY considering it’s been since last April that I’ve gotten the vaccine and my problems started last may and seem to still be ongoing and absolutely traumatizing to say the least. I should have never gotten that vaccine. Christian and I both think this is the root of my problems. I will definitely not be getting the booster that is for sure.“
LINK /
We already know you’ll accuse the women who got the jab as anti-vax loons. These cases are NOT a small percentage. That’s why big tech deletes every group women create to expose what is happening to them!
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:37 pm to lsupride87
quote:
So you want to post this research on this board and use this study, but at the same time you want to say frick the results of this study. You are in an interesting postion
I posted that they are finally admitting to what they lied about last year. I still think they’re lying by downplaying it as minimal and temporary.
Get it right you disingenuous POS.
This post was edited on 1/17/22 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 1/17/22 at 12:59 pm to LSUAngelHere1
Doctors early in 2021
We don’t have the data
Doctors then get the data and say it’s very reassuring
We take that to mean it causes hysterectomies because of Facebook comments from Janet on the article.
That’s about the just of this thread right?
We don’t have the data
Doctors then get the data and say it’s very reassuring
We take that to mean it causes hysterectomies because of Facebook comments from Janet on the article.
That’s about the just of this thread right?
Posted on 1/17/22 at 1:02 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Doctors early in 2021 We don’t have the data Doctors then get the data and say it’s very reassuring We take that to mean it causes hysterectomies because of Facebook comments from Janet on the article. That’s about the just of this thread right?
You just keep doubling down on the foolish look.
Posted on 1/17/22 at 1:03 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
How can they say this when they didn’t even know this was a risk to begin with?
We literally had to inject millions for a year to figure this out.
Well you see....early science hinted at this possibility but you see that science was against the science that makes crooks money so that accurate science had to be silenced.
Moral of the story is to trust the science. Which science to trust? Well my rule is to trust the science that goes against anything the government is promoting right now.
So far I’m unvaxxed and healthy. If I had covid over the last two years...I wouldn’t know.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News