Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

NIL Deal Buyouts

Posted on 12/7/21 at 8:06 pm
Posted by BDB83
Member since Mar 2019
88 posts
Posted on 12/7/21 at 8:06 pm
Should NIL deals include a non-compete contract or a buyout cluase to help alleviate poaching players to transfer? Won't eliminate the threat or problem all together, but I'd imagine there would be way less turn-over.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
284825 posts
Posted on 12/7/21 at 8:08 pm to
NIL is so insignificant with most of these players, when will y’all catch on?
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 12/7/21 at 8:09 pm to
NIL may be insignificant but the money is not.
Posted by BDB83
Member since Mar 2019
88 posts
Posted on 12/7/21 at 8:10 pm to
But what about the difference makers? "Pay to play" should also mean "Pay to stay". Paid Coaches have buyouts. Why not paid players?
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
34967 posts
Posted on 12/7/21 at 8:14 pm to
Not my money...but if it was I'd be tossing it to the long haul and walkon types. Mostly because I'm cheap.

Position players probably won't be signing contracts with those kind of strings until the portal has fricked over these guys a few times.

You'll really see what some of these kids characters are when that happens.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
47498 posts
Posted on 12/7/21 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

NIL is so insignificant with most of these players


Yeah with what Texas is doing I think you are wrong on this one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram