Started By
Message

re: Why did LSU hire Dinardo

Posted on 12/7/21 at 7:01 am to
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27911 posts
Posted on 12/7/21 at 7:01 am to
Dude, what level of revisionist history are you engaging in? 1) Emmert was not even a wasted cumshot at the time. 2) No one wanted to keep Curley, least of all Dean by the end.

In the end Curley did himself in. There was no Mark Emmert at LSU in 1994 he does not show up until 1999. The real impetus to get rid of Hallman started that summer with Larry Bankston getting all over Dean because he recognized that football could help the University which was suffering from budget issues and declining enrollment.

The legend of Mark Emmert is already overblown without having to add shite in there that could not possibly have happened
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram