- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The thing I hate about expansion is LSU becomes part of the
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:16 pm
Big 12 side of the conference:
Ark
Mizzou
A&M
while losing possible annual games against Auburn (can't miss game going back to the Dinardo days) and Florida
Ark
Mizzou
A&M
while losing possible annual games against Auburn (can't miss game going back to the Dinardo days) and Florida
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:18 pm to nicholastiger
Mizzou, if they join, would likely go to the East IMO.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:27 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Big 12 side of the conference:
dumb
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:30 pm to nicholastiger
Arkansas was never in the Big 12 and has never been in a conference with Mizzou. So if you want to call it the SWC + Big 8 side of the conference it would be more appropriate.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:31 pm to LSUray
Easiest is Mizzou to the East and an Annual with Arkie...
TAMU and USC then become permanent rivals...
TAMU and USC then become permanent rivals...
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:33 pm to nicholastiger
LSU and Auburn were never traditional foes. We rarely played Auburn before we had divisions in 1992. We have played Florida every year since 1971. However, the last 15 years or so, LSU-Auburn has become a must-watch game. While these rivalries would be missed, we could develop one with Texas A&M that could rival either Florida or Auburn over time.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:42 pm to will0637
Permanent opponents from the other division are going to go away and if we go to 16 teams, we're going to a pod system anyway.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:52 pm to Hawgon
quote:
Easiest is Mizzou to the East and an Annual with Arkie...
TAMU and USC then become permanent rivals...
this

Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:53 pm to nicholastiger
quote:Or if you prefer, the SWC/Big 8 side. Regardless, your point is well-made. I agree, I want LSU to be in with traditional SEC powers, not SEC newbies. The West will be a weaker division by a mile if the two Alabama teams migrate East. I'd rather see the SEC simply shake the box and try to balance the tradition/power side of the equation without geographic considerations.
Big 12 side of the conference:
Ark
Mizzou
A&M
Posted on 10/5/11 at 4:06 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
I want LSU to be in with traditional SEC powers, not SEC newbies.
Man how I remember the days when LSU sucked in the 80s and 90s.
quote:
try to balance the tradition/power side of the equation without geographic considerations.
B1G says hi.
That's some shitty division there. I like geographical, makes it Much easier to figure out who's who. That random thing B1G has going on and what you're suggesting just don't appeal to me.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 7:41 pm to nicholastiger
uhhh...I'm pretty damn sure I'd love to lose annual matches with Auburn and FL and replace them with Mizz and Texas JV
Posted on 10/5/11 at 7:45 pm to St Augustine
A&M and LSU have played 50 times......
Posted on 10/5/11 at 7:49 pm to will0637
quote:
LSU and Auburn were never traditional foes. We rarely played Auburn before we had divisions in 1992. We have played Florida every year since 1971. However, the last 15 years or so, LSU-Auburn has become a must-watch game. While these rivalries would be missed, we could develop one with Texas A&M that could rival either Florida or Auburn over time.
this is true. i didn't even know who those bastards were until we played them.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 7:53 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
this is true. i didn't even know who those bastards were until we played them.
We didn't play them for 26 straight years, from 1943 thru 1968. Before 43 we played them in Birmingham. Apparently we didn't want to play them at Shrug Jordan, or whatever it was called back them.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 7:53 pm to LSU GrandDad
If we get the two new teams and loose AU I will be disappointed. It is always a great game and I feel so good when we beat those bastards.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 7:57 pm to HooDooWitch
quote:
and I feel so good when we beat those bastards.



you are a riot, HooDooWitch. i love beating those bastards too. i really can't see beating missouri making me feel that good.

Posted on 10/5/11 at 8:09 pm to LSUray
quote:
Arkansas was never in the Big 12 and has never been in a conference with Mizzou. So if you want to call it the SWC + Big 8 side of the conference it would be more appropriate.
Finally, someone with a voice of reason.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 8:27 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
i really can't see beating missouri making me feel that good

Posted on 10/5/11 at 8:35 pm to texasaggie08
quote:
A&M and LSU have played 50 times......
true and we are clearly the superior program to A&M now and will remain so. Mizz and A&M will be significantly easier on the schedule every year than Auburn and UF.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 9:26 pm to St Augustine
All I know is the A&M-LSU rivalry could become almost as big as LSU-Bama.
Popular
Back to top
