- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/16/11 at 7:51 am to GamerAg
quote:
It's really not that hard of a concept to grasp. The Houston and Dallas/Ft. Worth markets alone add millions of viewers
the markets don't really matter as much as the fanbase/dedicated viewers
quote:
A&M fans will be more interested in watching other SEC games, as opposed to Big 12 games
i don't know if a long history of the SWC/big8 will be erased overnight
quote:
you will still get all the people that watch now,
not true. you'll lose viewers from the replaced game
Posted on 8/16/11 at 7:52 am to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
The total population of SEC states is 50 million
this kind of proves that it's not "markets" that drive the SEC viewership, no?
quote:
Adding the state of Texas gives the SEC another 25 million.
because everyone in the state of Texas will now watch SEC games
Posted on 8/16/11 at 11:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's really not that hard of a concept to grasp. The Houston and Dallas/Ft. Worth markets alone add millions of viewers
the markets don't really matter as much as the fanbase/dedicated viewers
And you seem to be a full blown retard incapable of understanding that TAMU has a large dedicated fanbase that will watch games.
quote:
A&M fans will be more interested in watching other SEC games, as opposed to Big 12 games
i don't know if a long history of the SWC/big8 will be erased overnight
1. TAMU was never i nthe Big 8. They don't give a shite about it.
2. They are tired of living in Texas' shadow. They want to move onto greener pastures.
quote:
you will still get all the people that watch now,
not true. you'll lose viewers from the replaced game
What?
More people will watch to see how things will shake out in the New SEC. They will be intrigued to see how TAMU does in the SEC. They'll be interested in seeing match-ups they've rarely or even never seen before.
You really don't understand the business of college football do you?
Posted on 8/16/11 at 1:23 pm to SandStorm
quote:
And you seem to be a full blown retard incapable of understanding that TAMU has a large dedicated fanbase that will watch games.
where did i say TAMU would be a bad choice (at least in these terms)? i haven't
quote:
2. They are tired of living in Texas' shadow. They want to move onto greener pastures.
they are still going to hate UT more than any other school and follow UT religiously as a result of that hate
you don't just erase that shite by joining a new conference
their fight song involves talkin shite about UT
quote:
More people will watch to see how things will shake out in the New SEC. They will be intrigued to see how TAMU does in the SEC. They'll be interested in seeing match-ups they've rarely or even never seen before.
theoretically, but you're still losing those south carolina or bama fans, who won't be watching that network, as they'll have to go to the new network broadcasting their games
i'll give an example
if Bama would be playing, N 2M bama fans would watch bama on ESPN
if TAMU replaces bama in that game, 2M TAMU fans = the 2M bama fans who won't be tuning in now (as they'll be watching on whichever other avenue is available)
now when you're talking about bumping USC, Ole Miss, or MSU it works out. but the total viewers of TAMU is tempered by the lost viewers of those fanbases. there is a net gain
now if we're talking about Missouri, then i doubt there is a net gain, as losing the current SEC fanbase audience will be a greater loss than whatever Missouri fans can add
Popular
Back to top


1





