- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Slive and Delany need to work this mess out
Posted on 9/13/11 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 9/13/11 at 3:43 pm
The two most powerful conferences need to act like the Spain and Portugal back in the day and sort this out.
I think the best case scenario is keep the big 12 alive by the SEC telling Aggie to go back to the big 12 and have the big ten tell Bevo that they can't join the B1G with the LHN.
Bevo should then go make the first move with Aggie and agree that the LHN will become the Big 12 network and think about adding two schools to expand their footprint. How about Colorado State, New Mexico, Memphis, BYU, Nevada or UNLV. Pick the best two out of those.
I think the best case scenario is keep the big 12 alive by the SEC telling Aggie to go back to the big 12 and have the big ten tell Bevo that they can't join the B1G with the LHN.
Bevo should then go make the first move with Aggie and agree that the LHN will become the Big 12 network and think about adding two schools to expand their footprint. How about Colorado State, New Mexico, Memphis, BYU, Nevada or UNLV. Pick the best two out of those.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 3:51 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
would never work - texas does not play well with others and would never agree to share monies equally ... which is why things are as they are, on the eve of implosion
Posted on 9/13/11 at 3:53 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
and if the world was run by logical, fair and peace loving people, we would have no war. and if people would only procreate if they could afford another mouth to feed and if governments were fair in their distribution of tax revenues, we would have no hunger. your scenerio, which i admit is what i would like to see, simply won't happen. us human beings ain't built that way. 
Posted on 9/13/11 at 3:57 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
I think the best case scenario is keep the big 12 alive by the SEC telling Aggie to go back to the big 12 and have the big ten tell Bevo that they can't join the B1G with the LHN.
That'll never happen.
quote:
Bevo should then go make the first move with Aggie and agree that the LHN will become the Big 12 network
That'll definitely never happen.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 3:59 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
Ralph Wiggum
You make some stupid posts bud.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:00 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
Do you think that Texas could strong arm the Pac-12 into letting them keep the LHN?
And how is revenue shared in the Pac-12?
I think with Texas' current mindset, the Pac-12 is the best bet. And honestly the ACC wouldn't be bad either. They could frick over the ACC more than the Big 12, and I bet they could have similar pull in the Pac-12.
And how is revenue shared in the Pac-12?
I think with Texas' current mindset, the Pac-12 is the best bet. And honestly the ACC wouldn't be bad either. They could frick over the ACC more than the Big 12, and I bet they could have similar pull in the Pac-12.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:06 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Do you think that Texas could strong arm the Pac-12 into letting them keep the LHN?
And how is revenue shared in the Pac-12?
I think with Texas' current mindset, the Pac-12 is the best bet. And honestly the ACC wouldn't be bad either. They could frick over the ACC more than the Big 12, and I bet they could have similar pull in the Pac-12.
I find it hard to beleive that Berkeley, UCLA, USC, Stanford, Oregon, and Washington the most powerful members of he PAC 12 would allow Texas the LHN knowing that it would put them at a disadvantage. The old guard of the pac ten won't let another school join like that in my opinion.
I believe the pac 12 shares equally and if not it's no way near the inequality of the current big 12.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:08 pm to CassiusClay
quote:
You make some stupid posts bud.
This isn't your decision aggie. Let the premeire conferences sort this out.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:09 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
think with Texas' current mindset, the Pac-12 is the best bet. And honestly the ACC wouldn't be bad either. They could frick over the ACC more than the Big 12, and I bet they could have similar pull in the Pac-12.
the acc was fricked over by fsu already. it worked (unequal revenue sharing) for awhile, then fsu went downhill and the acc championship game went to hell. the network money doesn't support losers for long. as far as the pac 12 goes i just don't see why texas would have that much pull. they have just expanded to 12 teams, got a new tv contract and added a championship game. they are looking at increasing revenues w/o texas. texas might muddle things up, esp in they try to keep their lhn deal. i see a real possibility that going independent as being the best option for them. only because of their network. and to think this is all happening for an increase of $15 million per year for them. it won't be very many years before that ain't so hot with inflation and all.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:12 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
This isn't your decision aggie. Let the premeire conferences sort this out.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:13 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
how is revenue shared in the Pac-12?
The most important part of any conference is money, and for the first time all revenues will be shared evenly by all 12 schools.
Last paragragh
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:24 pm to AUnite
quote:
This isn't your decision aggie. Let the premeire conferences sort this out.
It isn't your decision either,so stop pretending your retarded opinions matter on this board.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:25 pm to AUnite
quote:
The only exception would be if revenues were under $170 million where USC and UCLA would be guaranteed an additional $2 million.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:39 pm to CassiusClay
quote:
Ralph Wiggum
You make some stupid posts bud.
+1
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:40 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
I want the Big 12 to stay together. Don't think I like the idea of 16 team conferences. 
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:41 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
premeire
I love it when a guy thinks he's stomping a mudhole, when he's shooting himself in the foot. It's "premiere," goombah.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:43 pm to bayou2003
quote:
Don't think I like the idea of 16 team conferences.
It's where we are headed, and I really don't mind. With 4 16 team conferences, eight divisions, you essentially have the playoff system. Two teams win their divisions, they have a title game. The four conference champs then play in a NY Day bowl game, with the winners playing for the NC a week or so later. It only adds one game to the schedule of the national championship game participants.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:45 pm to CassiusClay
quote:
You make some stupid posts bud.
did you see his avatar and sig pic? What do you expect
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:45 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Kosmo
I think that was the old sharing system.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 4:46 pm to AUnite
That's a direct quote from the article that was posted.
Back to top


5




