- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SEC picks West Virginia, Mizzou, and....
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:46 pm
either Louisville or TCU.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:48 pm to heehaw
Doesn't make any sense to me.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:49 pm to heehaw
Louisville doesn't add a new market and they have a very fickle fan base.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:49 pm to Tiger Authority
It makes more sense than thinking teams will leave the ACC to come to the SEC.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:49 pm to heehaw
This is the SEC, not Conference-USA.
SEC has their pick of any ACC schools. Just watch.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:50 pm to heehaw
it is shite. it doesnt do shite for the future of the conference. read my other post on why fsu is not a good fit.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:51 pm to heehaw
SEC schools are flagship state universities & somehow Vandy. I don't think TCU and Louisville fit the profile.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:51 pm to heehaw
quote:
It makes more sense than thinking teams will leave the ACC to come to the SEC.
Then why add at all? To be bigger? So we'll add TCU because of what reason? That's why we added aTm, adding TCU is a terrible idea.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:53 pm to RockChalkTiger
quote:
This is the SEC, not Conference-USA.
SEC has their pick of any ACC schools. Just watch.
To make four 16 team conferences work all the conferences (yes, the SEC included) will have to go out of their traditional geographical boundaries to get teams.
We MIGHT get an ACC team. We would be lucky. I think the ACC stays intact and adds 4 teams.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:55 pm to heehaw
A&M, TCU, Mizzou and WVU would be fine with me. I have not been very keen on the idea of WVU until today. Their fans are very excited and WANT the SEC. In my world that counts for a lot.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:56 pm to heehaw
SEC won't go after Mizzou, not considered a "southern" school.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:57 pm to bayou2003
quote:
SEC won't go after Mizzou, not considered a "southern" school.
I don't think the SEC cares about "southern." The SEC cares about markets and money,
Posted on 9/18/11 at 10:58 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I don't think the SEC cares about "southern." The SEC cares about markets and money,
Which is why TCU doesn't make any sense with aTm already in the mix.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 11:05 pm to Tiger Authority
I really don't see why the SEC doesn't go hard after Mizzou, OU, and OSU. That isn't what I want to see, but I feel like its the obvious play for the SEC to make. It would prevent the Pac12 from making their big splash and would add 4 solid all around athletic departments. If you can't get UNC or Virginia Tech, OU/OSU seems to make a lot more sense than WVU or Louisville or TCU.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 11:15 pm to OilAg
A/M, WVU,NC state, and Rice. My new four picks for the SEC. RICE may seem strange but big time academics and even if I don't think it matters, everybody else says it does. Plus they are in the Houston market gives the SEC a easy win a year, hopefully. NC STate, 4 major schools in NC is ACC schools, they need to spread their footprint so trade NC state for Uconn. JMO
Posted on 9/18/11 at 11:16 pm to bamalee
quote:
A/M, WVU,NC state, and Rice. My new four picks for the SEC. RICE may seem strange but big time academics and even if I don't think it matters, everybody else says it does. Plus they are in the Houston market gives the SEC a easy win a year, hopefully. NC STate, 4 major schools in NC is ACC schools, they need to spread their footprint so trade NC state for Uconn. JMO
We have Texas, we have aTm. Rice or TCU makes no sense on any level.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 11:22 pm to RhodeIslandRed
quote:
A&M, TCU, Mizzou and WVU would be fine with me. I have not been very keen on the idea of WVU until today. Their fans are very excited and WANT the SEC. In my world that counts for a lot.
You have NO idea.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 11:22 pm to OilAg
quote:
I really don't see why the SEC doesn't go hard after Mizzou, OU, and OSU. That isn't what I want to see, but I feel like its the obvious play for the SEC to make. It would prevent the Pac12 from making their big splash and would add 4 solid all around athletic departments. If you can't get UNC or Virginia Tech, OU/OSU seems to make a lot more sense than WVU or Louisville or TCU.
i think the SEC would have easily taking that deal but OU's Boren only wants the Pac 10. he may be a Rhodes Scholar that wants to hang out Stanford and Berkeley, but when OU plays its first Pac-16 game out west, it will be like w/ the Clampets moved to Beverly Hills.
Posted on 9/18/11 at 11:45 pm to bamalee
We have Houston with A&M. If we add another Texas school then I'm all for TCU as they would solidify the DFW market. Piss on Rice.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News