Started By
Message
locked post

Louisville president: "SEC academic standards are too low".

Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:44 pm
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:44 pm
Their ranking: 167
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21714 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:45 pm to
Posted by ShreveportTIGER318
Shreveport
Member since Apr 2008
2921 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:46 pm to
I have never heard anything good (or bad) about Louisville. Is the Big East full of brain trusts?
Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10871 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:46 pm to
Translation: Athletically....We can't compete.
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21714 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Translation: Athletically....We can't compete.


Or..."We didn't and will not get an SEC invite."
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:47 pm to
It was even funnier the other day when Charlie Strong went on TV with a message to UL students who are UK fans and wear UK gear to class. He basically said they need to support their university, even if they couldn't get into UK. Yes, he actually said that.

Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
31886 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:47 pm to
Louisville:
Posted by GABlueDog
Marietta, GA
Member since Dec 2008
8045 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:52 pm to
I don't care what he says...the Louisville president would get down on both knees and open his mouth extra wide for an invitation to join the SEC.
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5913 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:52 pm to
A&M, UF, UGA and Vandy disagree

Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
33185 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 2:53 pm to
he's butthurt.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27220 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

A&M, UF, UGA and Vandy disagree


I know those US news rankings have recieved a lot of criticism because of what they use to rank schools but at 167 I think most of the SEC would look pretty sound compared to that.
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5913 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:14 pm to
No doubt. LSU has come a long way the last 10 years if Jindal doesn't frick it up. But that's a topic for another forum. Don't want to threadjack
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:15 pm to
For reference, the lowest ranked team in the SEC is State which is like 140 something I believe.
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3141 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:32 pm to
Do you have a link? Given the relative stature of Louisville academics I just can't see how he could say something like that with a straight face.
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:39 pm to
They were talking about it on Kentucky Sports Radio today, but they hadn't heard it first person and were also looking for verification. This is all I could come up with. If this is it, it's kinda disappointing.

LINK
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27220 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:40 pm to
LINK

Take it fwiw. There is no way they have people go and seriously study every one of these schools and then gives sound rankings on them. Hell for ECU it just said something about 6.0% of girls are in a sorority and 7.0% of guys are in a fraternity. Thats it. Says nothing of their academics.

If I can find an old link Clemson shamelessly trys to skew these rankings to appear higher on the list.
Posted by CajunFootball
Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
19432 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:40 pm to
Always have some haters.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27220 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:44 pm to
Clemson's skewing technique

quote:

Last week’s controversy over a Clemson University official’s admission that the land-grant institution had “walked the fine line between illegal, unethical, and really interesting” in efforts to rise in the U.S. News & World Report rankings reminded us of a special report we published two years ago.

In remarks at a meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, the Clemson official, Catherine E. Watt, said that the university’s single-minded pursuit of a higher ranking had led it to manipulate class sizes, to double its tuition so it would lower student-faculty ratios, and to rank all other colleges but Clemson as “below average” in U.S. News surveys of academic reputation.


Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:45 pm to
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27220 posts
Posted on 9/22/11 at 3:47 pm to
Though this is getting off topic there was a Clemson fan the other day on an SC board mentioning how SC had stayed true to its mission. To be a school designed to help kids in this state get a good education. Clemson has gone away from that and has gone for more academic appeal rather than helping the kids of our state.

With that said SC has been accepting more out of state kids than usual but still small compared to in-state kids. I think we've doing that to get out of state tuition considering we're becoming more and more of a public school with less public funding.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram