- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If UT doesn't go to the Pac10 CU is screwed
Posted on 6/13/10 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 6/13/10 at 8:46 pm
and i'm laughing my arse off
will they be the first athletic department to go bankrupt ever?
will they be the first athletic department to go bankrupt ever?
4
Posted on 6/13/10 at 8:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
It depends... I think the PAC will expand anyway. They just won't be getting the primo teams they were hoping for.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 8:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Maybe, but atleast they'll be competitve in their confernce
Posted on 6/13/10 at 8:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
I don't know the dollars and cents of CU's move to the Pac10, but IMO Colorado is a better "fit" in the Pac10 to begin with.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 8:52 pm to DocBugbear
quote:
They just won't be getting the primo teams they were hoping for.
which means they won't be making close to the estimated money they were trying to push last week
Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
Maybe not as much as if UT was there but I would still guess that a Pac16 without UT makes more money for CU than their current big 12 deal
Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:12 pm to DocBugbear
quote:
It depends... I think the PAC will expand anyway. They just won't be getting the primo teams they were hoping for.
If it doesn't get Texas and OU, who could it get that improves the quality of its football product? Why expand for mediocrity?
Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:13 pm to tigerguy121
i doubt that
without UT there is no cable network worth a shite
if they have to rely solely on tv deals, they will not get a good one. the west coast, zona, and denver, do not really watch/support CFB
without UT there is no cable network worth a shite
if they have to rely solely on tv deals, they will not get a good one. the west coast, zona, and denver, do not really watch/support CFB
Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
What'd you think about the Jayhawk scandal?
Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:29 pm to Linkovich
i was hoping it was more juicy and more connected to people in the program at a deeper/higher level
Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
assistant ad lost his job, and player's dad was involved. Total of six to eight athletic department employees. Could easily fall under loss of institutional control.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
They were going to get that anyway (at least not in the long term). I can't see how the PAC-10's deal will be worse than what CU was getting in the Big-12.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:46 pm to DocBugbear
Colorado made the smart move, if the PAC 10 picks up Utah its a nice fit for CU
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
CU to the Pac-10 had been a longstanding process which starting way before anyone thought Texas or OU had any interest at all in the Pac-10. The original deal was CU and Utah so the Pac-10 could then have a title game. UT and the rest sort of came out of nowhere
The best way for CU to boost revenue is to start winning again no matter what their TV deal is. The only way they're going to do that is that by getting back their prior place in California recruiting.
The best way for CU to boost revenue is to start winning again no matter what their TV deal is. The only way they're going to do that is that by getting back their prior place in California recruiting.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:15 pm to usc6158
quote:
The only way they're going to do that is that by getting back their prior place in California recruiting.
darrell scott has turned out real well in that regard, huh?
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:20 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
quote:
darrell scott has turned out real well in that regard, huh?
you're right. since they had a 5 star from California be a bust, they should probably keep recruiting the 2 star scrubs they're getting right now. Seems to be working well for them
when they were winning, it was off being one of the top recruiting schools in California. They need a way to get back to that to be a viable program
This post was edited on 6/13/10 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:22 pm to usc6158
Didn't CU live off of partial-qualifiers back then? They had a ton of off-the-field issues.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:23 pm to usc6158
no i agree, just joking of course
colt brennan pre-rape as well (mater dei)
colt brennan pre-rape as well (mater dei)
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:28 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
Am I missing something? Is UT and OU thinking of not joining the pac- 28? I thought this was a done deal. just going through the formalities?
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:37 pm to tmoney
A&M said no to the PAC-16 and is seriously considering the SEC.
OU looks like they are seriously considering both the PAC-16 and SEC.
UT is now nervous now that everyone isn't following along to PAC-16 and talking about salvaging Big-12.
The Big-12 still unfeasible, A&M knows it and realizes that UT is trying to blame the fall of the Big-12 on them.
Now the Texas legislature is having hearings Wed.
Nothing will happen until then.
Tune in next week for another episode of "Dallas"
OU looks like they are seriously considering both the PAC-16 and SEC.
UT is now nervous now that everyone isn't following along to PAC-16 and talking about salvaging Big-12.
The Big-12 still unfeasible, A&M knows it and realizes that UT is trying to blame the fall of the Big-12 on them.
Now the Texas legislature is having hearings Wed.
Nothing will happen until then.
Tune in next week for another episode of "Dallas"
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News