Started By
Message
locked post

Divide All States with two teams

Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:08 am
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18317 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:08 am
Really change it up...(Example ONLY) Is UK vs. UT a rivalry worth keeping? In this example, UT would lose Florida, but pick up LSU. This gives each division a 7 state footprint. Might also help us later to bring in an FSU,Clemson, etc. if their are not in the same division. This is what the Big10 did to save rivalries and increase value.

Division A:
Alabama (Auburn)
UT (UGA)
LSU (Florida)
TAMU (USCe)
Missouri (Arkie)
Ole Miss (MSU)
Kentucky (Vandy)

Division B:
Auburn (BAMA)
Georgia (UT)
Florida (LSU)
USCe (TAMU)
Arkie (Missouri)
MSU (Ole Miss)
Vandy (UK)

FIXED: removed double UK
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 10:20 am
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:09 am to
I like how this plan kicks Arkansas out, and has Kentucky playing in both divisions.

Posted by schrutefarms
San Antonio
Member since Dec 2009
594 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:11 am to
quote:

like how this plan kicks Arkansas out, and has Kentucky playing in both divisions.
Hell in basketball there backups could have won the SEC West last 2 years.
Posted by Hubbhogg
Our AD Sucks
Member since Dec 2010
13532 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:11 am to
quote:

allin2010


You start some god awful threads
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 10:12 am
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134050 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:15 am to
Wtf is this shite?
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3133 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:26 am to
I actually think this is intriguing. It kind of sucks that geography is out the window and we would have to come up with lame names for the divisions, but they are competitively balanced and seem to keep all of the best rivalries (Bama-Auburn, Fla-UGA, Egg Bowl, Tenn-Bama and Auburn-UGA).
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 10:29 am
Posted by SwatMitchell
Austin, TX
Member since Jan 2005
2324 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Division A:
Alabama (Auburn)
UT (UGA)
LSU (Florida)
TAMU (USCe)
Missouri (Arkie)
Ole Miss (MSU)
Kentucky (Vandy)

Division B:
Auburn (BAMA)
Georgia (UT)
Florida (LSU)
USCe (TAMU)
Arkie (Missouri)
MSU (Ole Miss)
Vandy (UK)


It is definitely creative and would be fun short term.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36589 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Division A:
Alabama (Auburn)
UT (UGA)
LSU (Florida)
TAMU (USCe)
Missouri (Arkie)
Ole Miss (MSU)
Kentucky (Vandy)

Division B:
Auburn (BAMA)
Georgia (UT)
Florida (LSU)
USCe (TAMU)
Arkie (Missouri)
MSU (Ole Miss)
Vandy (UK)


This really isn't that bad, considering we do keep cross divisional games. Very even, keeps most tradition. And travel isn't even that bad. Arky would probably get the worst of it, but it's not horrible.
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10352 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:40 am to
I don't really have a problem with this lineup. TAMU-USCe seems like a huge geographical distance to be a cross-divisional permanent. This could suck for Arkie as well. I like the idea though.
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 11:42 am
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36589 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:43 am to
quote:

TAMU-USCe seems like a huge geographical distance to be a cross-divisional permanent.


Yeah, but you'd get it at home every other year, they could hate on each other regarding BBQ. It be the "EAST" vs the "WEST". They are pretty even strength wise. I think it'd be cool.

Best lineup I've seen to keep rivalries and balance of power while keeping travel somewhat reasonable. I'd like to see everyone's avgerage travel based on this.
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 11:46 am
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10352 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:44 am to
What about?

Division A:
Alabama (Auburn)
UT (UGA)
LSU (Florida)
TAMU (USCe)
Missouri (Vandy)
Arkansas (UK)
Ole Miss (MSU)

Division B:
Auburn (BAMA)
Georgia (UT)
Florida (LSU)
USCe (TAMU)
UK (Arkie)
MSU (Ole Miss)
Vandy (Missouri)
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 11:46 am
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10352 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:47 am to
Ya know what else I really like about this? ... the possibility of these cross-divisional rivalries playing in the SECCG.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36589 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Division A:
Alabama (Auburn)
UT (UGA)
LSU (Florida)
TAMU (USCe)
Missouri (Vandy)
Arkansas (UK)
Ole Miss (MSU)

Division B:
Auburn (BAMA)
Georgia (UT)
Florida (LSU)
USCe (TAMU)
UK (Arkie)
MSU (Ole Miss)
Vandy (Missouri)


I think Vandy/UK and Missouri/Arky match up better as power and rivalry.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36589 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:48 am to
quote:

the possibility of these cross-divisional rivalries playing in the SECCG.


I'm ok with that to, but I wouldn't want them to be at the end of the year so they played back to back.
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10352 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:52 am to
quote:

I think Vandy/UK and Missouri/Arky match up better as power and rivalry.


Agreed - just trying to put Arkie back into the geographic fold.

I tried some other stuff - didn't really work. I really like the overall idea though.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
20474 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:54 am to
quote:

we would have to come up with lame names for the divisions


With this setup, call Division A the Bear Bryant Division and call Division B the Vince Dooley Division.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
80965 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:59 am to
Bryant and Kramer divisions
Posted by TeeBoy
suches, ga
Member since Sep 2006
318 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 12:14 pm to
I like it a lot.

similar to the "zipper" concept that was proposed for the Pac12. Split the teams in states that have 2 (OM/MSU, Bama/AU, UT/Vandy).

I would propose swapping Ark and Missouri, so that the 2 new teams are in opposite divisions.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 12:21 pm to
hell, i may be the only one that likes this but it seems balanced and does allow for rivalries to continue.
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10352 posts
Posted on 10/6/11 at 12:24 pm to
With 14 teams, does LSU play UGA once in a 6 year span at home and then once in Athens in the next 6 years span?

Ugh...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram