- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Auburn wants to leave West & Bama doesnt want Mizzou
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:29 am to PJinAtl
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:29 am to PJinAtl
quote:
Also, does aTm get a voice in this or do they have to wait until July 1st to be included in a vote?
They should have to wait until they stop sucking to get a vote.
0
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:30 am to bee Rye
quote:
fine, then again, no one better frick with LSU vs MSU, since it has a longer history than UT Bama
I agree.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:35 am to PJinAtl
It takes 9 votes to admit a new member.
And no, AtM does not have a vote. Slive said they would "have a seat at the table" next summer (June/July).
And no, AtM does not have a vote. Slive said they would "have a seat at the table" next summer (June/July).
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:37 am to bamasgot13
quote:
QUICK REMINDER: If ONLY UT & Bama voted against Mizzou then it wouldn't matter. The conference requires 9 votes for a team. Right now they only have 8. That means FOUR teams currently are saying "No thanks"
Same crap we heard with expanding to add A&M. I'm not buying any of it. First it was UF and SC saying no, and now it's Bama UT. I'm calling BS
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:38 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:I know it takes 9 to admit a new member, but do we know for certain it is 8-4. It could be 7-5 and that would still be a majority of schools in favor.
It takes 9 votes to admit a new member
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:38 am to memphisplaya
Somebody put this on CEB, what do y'all think. I could live with it. Yearly cross divisional games in parenthesis.
Division A:
Alabama (Auburn)
UT (UGA)
LSU (Florida)
TAMU (USCe)
Missouri (Arkie)
Ole Miss (MSU)
Kentucky (Vandy)
Division B:
Auburn (BAMA)
Georgia (UT)
Florida (LSU)
USCe (TAMU)
Arkie (Missouri)
MSU (Ole Miss)
Vandy (UK)
Division A:
Alabama (Auburn)
UT (UGA)
LSU (Florida)
TAMU (USCe)
Missouri (Arkie)
Ole Miss (MSU)
Kentucky (Vandy)
Division B:
Auburn (BAMA)
Georgia (UT)
Florida (LSU)
USCe (TAMU)
Arkie (Missouri)
MSU (Ole Miss)
Vandy (UK)
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 11:40 am
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:42 am to NATidefan
They're just trying to scare Mizzou and teach them to shut their fricking mouth due to the "we'd rather have the Big10" shite they tried to pull.
Everything will get worked out.
Everything will get worked out.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:43 am to NATidefan
quote:Was posted on this thread about page 14...
Somebody put this on CEB, what do y'all think. I could live with it. Yearly cross divisional games in parenthesis.
Great idea.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:46 am to PJinAtl
I still vote for either revoking A&M's application, or kicking Arky out
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:48 am to stat19
quote:
I think the success Aub has had against Florida and (IMO)would continue to have would cause the Florida fanbase to forget UT and focus more on Auburn
Auburn hasn't had much success vs UF for the last half of the series. They have the over all lead by 4 wins, but the majority of them came in the first half of the rivalry.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:48 am to bee Rye
Let's bring in FSU in the east. Problem solved.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:49 am to bee Rye
I still prefer my idea of expansion.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:50 am to memphisplaya
The SEC was so perfect at 12. Now look at this shite 
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:53 am to memphisplaya
quote:
I still prefer my idea of expansion.
When did Auburn move to Gadsden?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:54 am to slacker130
why would SEC want to add an elite team to the conference? Wouldn't adding another elite team or two makes schedule so difficult, making it harder to go undefeated or having 10 win seasons therefore making it easier for other conferences to get BCS bowl bids over an SEC team with 3 or 4 losses because the conference is too stacked. Adding Mizzou to the mix is a quality football and basketball program yet doesn't make the conference too stack that it difficult to get a 10+win SEC team each year.
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:54 am to slacker130
When I held down the up arrow on Photoshop. DWI
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:59 am to memphisplaya
Hold down the right button next time and get us out of that shithole of a state.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 12:05 pm to slacker130
quote:
When did Auburn move to Gadsden?
Operation Red Dog.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 12:06 pm to augrad00
quote:
Adding Mizzou to the mix is adding a bottom feeding football program that dillutes the once mighty SEC into a lesser conference (kinda like the rest)
Fixed.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 12:14 pm to slacker130
So adding a team like VaTech or FSU so that a team could have a conference schedule to include a mix of Vatech, FSU, LSU, Auburn, Alabama, UF, USCe, Arkansas, Miss State, UGA, UT, among others would be smart? No one could survive a schedule with a conference full of that many tough opponents and make a title run. Doesn't make sense to me to put your conference in a situation that would make it tough to have a title contender because he could have 3 or 4 conference loss each year due to conference schedule. Other conferences would love for the SEC to do this.
Page 16 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News