- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Auburn wants to leave West & Bama doesnt want Mizzou
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:45 am to Stanky Legg
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:45 am to Stanky Legg
quote:the 2 schools closest to Mizzou are in the East
Other than the travel issues, which I really don't give a shite about as it's not my problem, yes.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:46 am to Stanky Legg
Badasses :
Bama
LSU
UGA
UF
SC
Squealers
AU
UT
MSU
The rest
Bama
LSU
UGA
UF
SC
Squealers
AU
UT
MSU
The rest
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 10:46 am
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:47 am to bee Rye
quote:
the 2 schools closest to Mizzou are in the East
And the other 4?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:48 am to memphisplaya
I'll take that, even with those division names. 
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:48 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
you won't see uss whining and trying to block it.
BS if it meant no more AU-UGA each year. No way ya'll would say, "oh well, we didn't need that rivalry anyhow".
AU-UGA is SEC football. UA-UT is SEC football. However it is done, these games are a must IMHO.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:49 am to ohiovol
quote:
Reading this thread, it's funny to see Auburn fans talking about sacrifice and how since they sacrificed games 20 years go, UT and Bama should, too.
They gave up their 3rd and 4th biggest rivals, so now people expect Tennessee (and some Bama fans) to give up their biggest rival?
True, some au fans are listing five or six teams they consider rivals. Guess what, when you consider half the conference a rival, it is safe to say you will have to give up some of them.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:49 am to bee Rye
quote:
but lets be honest here. outside of Tuscaloosa and Knoxville, no one else in the country sees this game as a rivalry
Exactly
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:51 am to memphisplaya
quote:
"Anyone that thinks they know what's going on, doesn't know shite from a flank steak. "
Your Butcher?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:51 am to allin2010
quote:Probably the best idea (and alignment) I have seen/heard yet. Also, didn't the ACC do somewhat the same thing in going to 12 with the Atlantic and Coastal divisions to try to balance it out and maintain some traditional rivalries?
This gives each division a 7 state footprint. Might also help us later to bring in an FSU,Clemson, etc. if their are not in the same division. This is what the Big10 did to save rivalries and increase value.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:52 am to bona fide
quote:
True, some au fans are listing five or six teams they consider rivals. Guess what, when you consider half the conference a rival, it is safe to say you will have to give up some of them.
And that's exactly what we did by going to the West, and then giving up Florida later.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:53 am to Joe Blow
quote:
North - Mizzou, Ark, V, UT, UK, USC, OM
South - TAMU, LSU, UGA, MSU, AU, UA, UF
Permanents
Mizzou - TAMU
Ark - LSU
UA - UT
OM - MSU
The rest can draw straws.
Ummm, any chance Auburn can get in that North division? I'll go ahead and buy lifetime seats in the Georgia Dome now.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:56 am to auisssa
quote:
AU-UGA is SEC football. UA-UT is SEC football. However it is done, these games are a must IMHO
We'd still line up and play someone on saturday right?
I see your point, and would hate for auburn to lose their game, and for bama to lose its game with UT, but things change...no point in sounding like crochety old men tlaking about days of yore.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:56 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
Division A:
Alabama (Auburn)
UT (UGA)
LSU (Florida)
TAMU (USCe)
Missouri (Arkie)
Ole Miss (MSU)
Kentucky (Vandy)
Division B:
Auburn (BAMA)
Georgia (UT)
Florida (LSU)
USCe (TAMU)
Arkie (Missouri)
MSU (Ole Miss)
Vandy (UK)
This is the only one we should discuss from now on.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:57 am to auisssa
quote:so what is it when UGA and LSU play? Sun Belt football?
AU-UGA is SEC football. UA-UT is SEC football. However it is done, these games are a must IMHO.
no rivalry is greater than the conference
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:57 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
Ummm, any chance Auburn can get in that North division? I'll go ahead and buy lifetime seats in the Georgia Dome now.
No. Bama has to be in the same division as AU and/or UT.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:59 am to bee Rye
quote:
no rivalry is greater than the conference
Cleary you're not aware that bama and ut are the frickign sec.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:01 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
So this is a rivalry: Overall, Alabama leads the series with an official 47–38–7 record. (Bama vs TN)
But this isn't: Auburn holds the advantage in the overall win-loss-tie record in the rivalry series, 42–38–2. (Auburn vs Fla)
Yeah.... big difference.....
For the umpteenth time...its not about how many games you've played, or how close the series is.
Is this really that hard to figure out? We've got multiple Florida posters on here saying its not a rivalry...would we get the same response from bama and Auburn fans to a question about whether we were RIVALS?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:02 am to Joe Blow
quote:
No. Bama has to be in the same division as AU and/or UT.
Why? Screw Bama and Tenn. I hope they lose their rivalry. I won't lose any sleep over it. Neither will anyone else other than those two fanbases. It'd be fun to make fun of them this year about how we screwed them over when they visit the Plains in November.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:03 am to DvlsAdvocat
quote:
would we get the same response from bama and Auburn fans to a question about whether we were RIVALS?
we're not rivals.
If a poster says it, it must be true.
Popular
Back to top


1




