Started By
Message
locked post

Was Jimbo to A&M a net positive for the school?

Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:39 pm
Posted by Olric
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
2206 posts
Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:39 pm
Obviously my opinion means nothing, but I don't like the idea of SW following that same blueprint of bringing in an expensive established coach. The Dabo's and Kelly's of the world do nothing for me and make it much more difficult to move on from 3-5 years from now if need be. I would so much rather swing for the fences on a young up and coming coach who could build a 30 year program
Posted by LaPride55
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2017
388 posts
Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:46 pm to
SW knew he was coming to LSU and wanted to saddle ATM with a shitty, expensive coach for a decade
This post was edited on 11/29/21 at 2:47 pm
Posted by Mobiletiggah
Mobile Alabama
Member since Mar 2021
4023 posts
Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:53 pm to
I don’t think so. Well one thing for certain, from day one they were $75 million poorer. So far they haven’t gotten much in return.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87412 posts
Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:54 pm to
I see the trap that you've laid here
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram