- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Was Jimbo to A&M a net positive for the school?
Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:39 pm
Obviously my opinion means nothing, but I don't like the idea of SW following that same blueprint of bringing in an expensive established coach. The Dabo's and Kelly's of the world do nothing for me and make it much more difficult to move on from 3-5 years from now if need be. I would so much rather swing for the fences on a young up and coming coach who could build a 30 year program
Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:46 pm to Olric
SW knew he was coming to LSU and wanted to saddle ATM with a shitty, expensive coach for a decade
This post was edited on 11/29/21 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:53 pm to Olric
I don’t think so. Well one thing for certain, from day one they were $75 million poorer. So far they haven’t gotten much in return.
Posted on 11/29/21 at 2:54 pm to Olric
I see the trap that you've laid here
Popular
Back to top
3





