- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to be objective...is O really a bad decision?
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:18 pm to GeorgeReymond
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:18 pm to GeorgeReymond
quote:
We pay a $10 million buyout to fire a guy who went 141-55. Then straight up hire a guy who is 21-29
We are a laughing stock
You have to admit it is pretty funny.
1
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:52 pm to genuineLSUtiger
Has anyone seen a HC hire so far that they wouldn't trade O for straight up?
Herman-lulz
Rhule-probably
Tom Allen-probably not
Jeff Brohm-yes
Jeff Tedford- I might kick the tires on him
Butch Davis-why not?
So I think we can all agree that O is probably a better hire than Indiana's Tom Allen. Yippee.
Herman-lulz
Rhule-probably
Tom Allen-probably not
Jeff Brohm-yes
Jeff Tedford- I might kick the tires on him
Butch Davis-why not?
So I think we can all agree that O is probably a better hire than Indiana's Tom Allen. Yippee.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:54 pm to roscoe mike
I thought it was hurried, not necessarily bad, time will tell if it is a bad decision or not.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:30 pm to dbbuilder79
quote:
He's our Ditka
Are you saying that like it's a good thing? You a saints fan?
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:43 pm to roscoe mike
So because you didn't get a homerun hire in Fisher or Herman, you hire a guy with a resume of failure as an actual non-interim head coach and no side of the ball he can influence outside of a specific position set?
Hmmmm.... I don't know, why not just hire an up and comer with tons of potential instead of the failure that is O simply because he went 4-2 with an embarrassing loss and beating no team with no less than 4 losses?
LSU should have taken the risk at this point, but instead they settled for almost assured failure.
Hmmmm.... I don't know, why not just hire an up and comer with tons of potential instead of the failure that is O simply because he went 4-2 with an embarrassing loss and beating no team with no less than 4 losses?
LSU should have taken the risk at this point, but instead they settled for almost assured failure.
Page 11 of 11
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News