Started By
Message

re: Thanks!!

Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:02 pm to
Posted by um2007
Member since Nov 2009
283 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:02 pm to
I understand what you are saying, and I agree. I just know that if Brady Hoke did not have any ties to UofM he would not even be considered.

The bottom line is, yes, people here were pissed off at what had become under RR, and for the most part it looked like it wasn't going to work, but if you told us that Brady Hoke would be the next coach, we would have shut up and stuck with RR for one more year.
Posted by Reconnisaur
Germany
Member since Jan 2011
61 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:09 pm to
Yea who would have thought?
Posted by TinyTigerPaws
Member since Aug 2004
35039 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

You guys don't realize how disappointed we were when UCLA upset USC in 2006. LSU vs. Michigan in the Rose Bowl (we had Jamarcus Russell, Dwayne Bowe, Laron Landry) would have been epic. I already had made plans to be there.


+1 still fuss about it to this day.
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38977 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:11 pm to
Peace out!
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36476 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Choupique19


The one thing that I'll say is different from those is Hoke (at least at Ball State) did eventually build them up, but it took a long time (and it appeared that one good year he had might have been a fluke). He did turn SDSU around quickly, though. However, his career record is still below .500.

Meyer was dominant for a long time everywhere. BGSU went 2-9 the year before Meyer, and went 8-3 in his first year, 9-3 in his second, then obviously the great success at Utah. Saban did only have one year at Toledo, but he went 9-2 (they went 6-5 before he got there), a great record. Hoke struggled for a long time at Ball State, and did also have one bad year at SDSU. I agree that maybe long term, it can be a really good hire. However, if he starts off slow the first 2 or 3 years (like Rodriguez) he may not get the full chance. With patience, it could work. I'm just afraid Michigan is desparate to win NOW, and if things start slowly, it could get bad in a hurry.

ETA: And I know Chizik just won an NC, but call me crazy, I think he's a mediocre coach. Once Newton and Malzahn leave, I think they'll be screwed.
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:18 pm to
Just out of curiosity, is it Rich Rod's fault that UM had a terrible defense this year? He is largely identified as an offensive genius, and I think it can be said that he did a fine job coaching up that unit over the past 3 years and installed a pretty solid offense with Denard running the show....

Should be maybe have been given consideration to hire another DC and allowed to recruit some defense for another year or two?
Posted by nycajun
Nothin' could be finer.....
Member since Dec 2004
18183 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Just out of curiosity, is it Rich Rod's fault that UM had a terrible defense this year? He is largely identified as an offensive genius, and I think it can be said that he did a fine job coaching up that unit over the past 3 years and installed a pretty solid offense with Denard running the show....


You know, you're right. What could we have been thinking? The fault lies with the head coach. Get him in here, will ya?
This post was edited on 1/11/11 at 1:23 pm
Posted by um2007
Member since Nov 2009
283 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:31 pm to
I'd say the fault absolutely lies with him. DCs being forced to run a scheme that didn't particularly work with the talent we had. Plus, to be honest, our offense shut down against teams with a pulse. Did you see our last few regular season games plus the bowl game?

I think I said it earlier in this thread, but from what I've heard RR was given the opportunity to overhaul his defensive staff and chose not to do it.

I absolutely wanted him fired, but am not going to lie that I kind of regret it knowing what our option might be. Hope Hoke proves me wrong!
Posted by damnstrongfan
St. George, Louisiana
Member since Dec 2009
2409 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:37 pm to
Always been a Michigan fan. I love those cool helmets and your fight song is one of the best!!
Good luck on the coaching search and dont be a stranger.
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36476 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

I absolutely wanted him fired, but am not going to lie that I kind of regret it knowing what our option might be. Hope Hoke proves me wrong!


The thing that (in my opinion) really sucks for Michigan is the fact that if a guy like Hoke was hired directly after Carr, it may have been a tiny bit of an adjustment, but not much. Michigan wouldn't have had to clean house, and rebuild, and most of the foundation would still be in place. What Michigan did was they hired RRod directly after Carr. This meant that a completely new system, ideal, phiosophy, etc had to be put in place, which takes time to build. It's been three years, and the transition wasn't complete and they let RRod go. If in a few more years, RR was there, could they finally been an elite program again? Maybe but we'll never know now.

But by hiring RR, having him recruit his players, get his culture in there, etc, you completely changed Michigan football. And now, with Hoke, you want to go back to the old days/old style under Bo/Carr while RR's players and culture have been established. So this will probably take another 3 years (possibly more) to overcome. So essentially, by hiring RR, Michigan lost about 6 years (the 3 to change from the Carr culture to the Rodriguez, and the 3 to change back from the Rodriguez culture/players to Hoke [Carr]), while if Hoke (or Miles, etc) would have been hired right away in 07, that culture is already there, and there's no need to change. You lose 0 years. It's unfortunate for Michigan.
This post was edited on 1/11/11 at 1:48 pm
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36476 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 1:53 pm to
I also hope that when Tress decides to retire, OSU learns a lesson from this and decides to (while not hire an exact Tress-like coach) not go way out there and hire someone who wants to completely change what is built.
This post was edited on 1/11/11 at 1:59 pm
Posted by Nearl
Town
Member since Feb 2009
804 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:01 pm to
To be honest, I really really disliked Michigan before this week. I didn't have a good reason, I just didn't like UM. I think it was the pompousness I perceived from the program.

But you guys were a lot of fun, and I'll be rooting for UM from now on.
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:03 pm to
fair enough, just curious as to your feelings on the issue. I know he is the HC and obviously responsible for the entire team, but this was a thought that came to mind.

Maybe RR is simply destined to be an elite OC somewhere with elite talent...wonder how he really feels about leaving WVU now?
Posted by nycajun
Nothin' could be finer.....
Member since Dec 2004
18183 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

I absolutely wanted him fired, but am not going to lie that I kind of regret it knowing what our option might be. Hope Hoke proves me wrong!


RR was never the right guy for Michigan. Not by temperament. Not by background. Not by philosophy. Whenever he left wasn't too soon. Michigan will be fine if it hires for talent and not for name recognition. It's still a valuable franchise, and there are lots of talented guys out there.
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10313 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:05 pm to
It has been debated before here and probably on message boards all over the country, but I think hte spread is way overated. It will work fine on teams without dominant lineman and fast LB's and Corners. But it takes a QB with a certain skill set Cam Newton, Tim Tebow or Dennard Robinson. The problem with Michigan they don't have a supporting cast. Tebow had Rainey, Demps and Harvin, when he lost one of the puzzle they dropped off in production when they lost Tebow look what happened. Auburn had Dywer, Macaleb and a hell of an offensive line. Both of Michigans lines got blown up by OSU, MSU, and Wisconsin.
Posted by Reconnisaur
Germany
Member since Jan 2011
61 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:18 pm to
We started out good in the season against the weaker teams and we looked good. But as the season went on things just kept getting worse. Especially the defense.

Did anyone catch the basketball game-like score we ran up along with Illinois?

We had nada for special teams, and were forced to go for it instead of kicking field goals. It was really apparent during the time before the bowl game. It seemed things never improved even in the few weeks of prep time before the Miss State game. We got taken to the wood shed. It was time for Rich to go. The sooner we get a new coach to point us in the right direction the better.

As for RR's DC, I had read somwhere that he was given the opportunity to replace him, but chose not to. TTFWIW.
Posted by um2007
Member since Nov 2009
283 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:22 pm to
You're absolutely right, this has set us back. I think Bill Martin was in such a panic to get a big name that he jumped on the first one that would bite not even thinking of the rebuilding aspect.
This post was edited on 1/11/11 at 2:28 pm
Posted by JawjaTigah
On the Bandwagon
Member since Sep 2003
22905 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Thanks for the lively conversation this past week. Great group of fans, I really mean that. You guys have one hell of a coach, I hope you all realize that, and I hope you all appreciate him, faults and all. Just take it from us as a lesson, what this in fighting garbage will get you. We are a mess. You don't ever want to be where we are right now.

I've always cheered for LSU, and after this past week interacting with you all, I love your school even more!
Thank you UM2007. And you are right - we do have one hell of a coach, and more and more of us are starting to appreciate him, eccentricities and all. As for the in-fighting, LSU is no stranger to that. It really started after Paul Dietzel left LSU back in the 1960s. Some never accepted Cholly Mac as our HC. Finally he was forced out and LSU went into two decades of coaching instability. It was horrible. The positiger/negatiger controversy along these threads is nothing compared to the kinds of Dietzel/anti-Dietzel and pro-Mac/anti-Mac fighting that went on here.

Good luck in your search; I will be a Wolverine fan in most games when I can (unless y'all play LSU).
This post was edited on 1/11/11 at 2:25 pm
Posted by StarkvilleTigerFan
Muncie, IN
Member since Jan 2005
3993 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:27 pm to
Yes-I live here in Muncie, IN and Hoke did build the program up a little but high tailed it out at the right time because he had nothing in the cupboard after the Nate Davis/senior lines left. His stock would have gone down fast but he is a decent coach and in time, he might get Michigan back. I do however think Michigan could do better.
Posted by um2007
Member since Nov 2009
283 posts
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

It seemed things never improved even in the few weeks of prep time before the Miss State game.


This was probably the biggest thing for me. Two weeks to prepare for Penn State, and we lay an egg.
Five weeks to prepare for the bowl game and we come out looking like we had never even played football before. We always seemed to give up (for lack of a better term) way too easily. One turnover and the wheels completely fell off.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram