re: So O Gets All Credit For The Offensive Records But None Of The Blame

You O lovers are killing me. If you give the man all the praise because we managed to put gaudy offensive numbers against shite teams, he needs to get all the blame for not doing a Goddamn thing against a good team. You a-holes will find any and every reason to try and give this man the job because he fricking talks like us and loves LSU. I don't give a shite how much he loves LSU, he is not the man for the fricking job. The sooner you idiots realize this, the sooner we can hire a worthy coach and move on with life.

Funniest part they blamed CLM with his offenses against this team but not CEO.

The "CEO" has said that he lets his coaches do their job. Aranda was doing his last night in spectacular fashion so their was no need to interfere. Ensminger's offense was stinking the stadium and needed to be interfered with. Why didn't O do his job and try fix it?

quote:

---

The "CEO" has said that he lets his coaches do their job. Aranda was doing his last night in spectacular fashion so their was no need to interfere. Ensminger's offense was stinking the stadium and needed to be interfered with. Why didn't O do his job and try fix it?

---

Therein lies the problem; he can't fix it. So the O supporters' solution to this is to hire a OC that doesn't need to be fixed. The thing is, most OCs need to be monitored and directed. The ones that don't will be HCs pretty soon.

So best case scenario is we find one of these savants, he stays for a couple of seasons and then he's gone for a HC gig. Do people really thing we're going to keep finding these offensive geniuses and have them in steady rotation here at LSU? I think that's unlikely.

Who are the vocal O Lovers? I was on the O train but it was always with the caveat that he had to win out once Ogeron took over the reins. Not going to happen now and time to look elsewhere, so who are the real O for Head Coach lovers besides Ponamsky (sp).