Started By
Message
locked post

So guys

Posted on 12/6/08 at 2:44 pm
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11283 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 2:44 pm
We want to hire a DC who doesn't bltiz LB's right?
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
12593 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 3:13 pm to
Is VK the new guy or not? The other night you were pretty sure that he was.
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11283 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 3:27 pm to
I've changed my opinion, Turns out he doesn't blitz much. Plays soft zone. I was wrong about him.
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
12593 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 3:29 pm to
not sure if you're being sarcastic on that point. But you, and others, wrote as if it were a done deal that VK was hired.
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11283 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 3:47 pm to
I herd it was a done deal like everyone else. Apparently it wasn't.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63710 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

I've changed my opinion, Turns out he doesn't blitz much. Plays soft zone. I was wrong about him.


You are being way too simple about the situation.

Koening is a very good DC.
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11283 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 4:02 pm to
Let me ask you, Do you like what Malveto does with our LB's?
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
12593 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Let me ask you, Do you like what Malveto does with our LB's?


Does anyone like much of anything our D did this year?
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11283 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 4:08 pm to
The #1 reason our D was so bad because we rarely blitz our LB's when we do the blitz packages suck arse.
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
12593 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

The #1 reason our D was so bad because we rarely blitz our LB's when we do the blitz packages suck arse.


I would rate poor pass coverage as a greater reason our D struggled. Our four man base rush was not as effective as most thought it would be either.
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11283 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 4:13 pm to
Piss poor coverage can be covered up with a bad arse pass rush. With VK we're gonna get DB's 10-15 yards off the ball with 3 or 4 down line men.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63710 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Let me ask you, Do you like what Malveto does with our LB's?


Let me answer you.

Malleveto's problems are WAAAAAAY bigger than how often the blitz the LBs.

The much larger problem is the breakdowns in coverage when we don't blitz...and our failure to get to the QB when we do.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63710 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

The #1 reason our D was so bad because we rarely blitz our LB's


This is definitely not the #1 reason our D was so bad.
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
12593 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Piss poor coverage can be covered up with a bad arse pass rush. With VK we're gonna get DB's 10-15 yards off the ball with 3 or 4 down line men.


I posted this 2 nights ago and you said it wasn't true. Now it is? I thought you said he could coach?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63710 posts
Posted on 12/6/08 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

I posted this 2 nights ago and you said it wasn't true. Now it is? I thought you said he could coach?


Whether it's true or not (it's true) it doesn't excuse piss poor coverage.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram