- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My best "Guess" ;)
Posted on 12/2/09 at 7:51 am to fishngrits
Posted on 12/2/09 at 7:51 am to fishngrits
quote:
Missed tackles and getting dominated at the line is the PLAYERS not focusing on fundamentals
There...fixed it for ya.
1
Posted on 12/2/09 at 8:04 am to 31TIGERS
Properly coached, the players wouldn't be making the same mistakes all season long. Yes, the players should do the right thing, but it is up to the coaches to make sure they do it.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 10:49 am to nycajun
quote:The whole point of a fan driven website is to get UNAUTHORIZED information from LSU that is inside information and not univeristy spin, genius.
Belowpar,
I sincerely hope that publicizing your "guesses" in this forum was authorized by someone in a position of authority at LSU.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 11:04 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
The whole point of a fan driven website is to get UNAUTHORIZED information from LSU that is inside information and not univeristy spin, genius.
Agreed. Just like the whole point of The New York Times is to get unauthorized information from the U.S. military about planned troop movements in war zones that is inside information and not Defense Department spin. Einstein.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 11:04 am to nycajun
That analogy is so fricked up you should catch the ban.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 11:47 am to nycajun
quote:
quote:
The whole point of a fan driven website is to get UNAUTHORIZED information from LSU that is inside information and not univeristy spin, genius.
Agreed. Just like the whole point of The New York Times is to get unauthorized information from the U.S. military about planned troop movements in war zones that is inside information and not Defense Department spin. Einstein.
You sir are an idiot.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:05 pm to BayAreaTigerFan
quote:
You sir are an idiot.
The point of my original post, as well as the somewhat over the top analogy, was not to criticize TD (or the NY Times, though the NY Times deserves much worse than just being criticized). The point was that the people on the inside who provide the leaks often do so without regard to the adverse consequences their action will have on those to whom, in most cases, they owe loyalty. It is far too much to hope that the media outlet will act responsibly in weighing the benefits of publication against the harm, but it isn't too much to expect that insiders will act responsibly and within the bounds of sound moral judgment. Of course the harm to soldiers whose plans are exposed is greater than the harm to an offensive coordinator who is going to have to make a career change, or the institution that would like to make an orderly transition. But it is harm nonetheless. The question is whether that harm is justified by the benefit the leaker (not the media) derives.
This post was edited on 12/2/09 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:30 pm to nycajun
i'm just telling you my best guess...Nothing is 100%, take it for what you will.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:32 pm to belowpar
quote:ignore the assholes
i'm just telling you my best guess...Nothing is 100%, take it for what you will.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:36 pm to nycajun
quote:
Agreed. Just like the whole point of The New York Times is to get unauthorized information from the U.S. military about planned troop movements in war zones that is inside information and not Defense Department spin. Einstein.
stop crying
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:39 pm to belowpar
quote:
Crowton-Gone
My best guess is he stays.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:40 pm to specs1
Songy started the "Crowton to stay" bullshite today. Do I go with belowpar or Songy? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm. 
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:50 pm to specs1
quote:
Yes, but I said several days ago that he stays. Songy is just agreeing w/ me.
I don't really give a frick who started it, I just want it to be bullshite.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 3:24 pm to belowpar
belowpar has my highest respect 
Posted on 12/2/09 at 4:58 pm to Soft_Parade
quote:
If Stud and Moffitt are added to the list, I will be a happy man. Our O-Line and Conditioning was atrocious the last two seasons.
AMEN!!!
Posted on 12/2/09 at 4:59 pm to 756
I'd be betting on my side ;)
Posted on 12/2/09 at 5:39 pm to Doc Fenton
how can any lsu fan in their right frame of mind claim moffit needs to be gone.. clueless
Posted on 12/2/09 at 5:42 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:Don't you dare let the Rant hear you say that...
If Stud and Moffitt are added to the list,
Posted on 12/2/09 at 7:26 pm to ehidal1
moffit is not the problem. He is GOLD.
What about dooley?? from la tech? I was very impressed with the excecution of their offense and the way he handles himself.
Does he coach offense? Helluva coach dooley is.
What about dooley?? from la tech? I was very impressed with the excecution of their offense and the way he handles himself.
Does he coach offense? Helluva coach dooley is.
Page 11 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News