Started By
Message
locked post

Muschamp no longer candidate for Tech job

Posted on 12/4/07 at 7:53 pm
Posted by bayourant
Homer
Member since Aug 2005
34445 posts
Posted on 12/4/07 at 7:53 pm
Posted by LSUFroMan
under the bed
Member since Dec 2007
675 posts
Posted on 12/4/07 at 8:08 pm to
Thats good for him! I don't think everybody knows he will not come back to LSU. He had the job and decided to go to Auburn. Why would he want to come back to LSU?
That is bad GATech.
This post was edited on 12/4/07 at 8:09 pm
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
19253 posts
Posted on 12/4/07 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

He had the job and decided to go to Auburn.


He left LSU to go to Miami with Saban.
Posted by darbour21
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2006
2150 posts
Posted on 12/4/07 at 11:39 pm to
hes going to make a hell of a coach one day.
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
38930 posts
Posted on 12/5/07 at 2:51 am to
He's a hell of a coach now.
Posted by ItNeverRains
Offugeaux
Member since Oct 2007
28166 posts
Posted on 12/5/07 at 9:24 am to
He needs to be our DC or get out of SEC, guy is sick
Posted by chaso
clinton ms.
Member since Aug 2006
3331 posts
Posted on 12/5/07 at 10:02 am to
he is defineitly a wild man on the sidelines but u guys give that to much . hes good hes not great he might be one day but not now ,imo
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
14738 posts
Posted on 12/5/07 at 10:06 am to
I've said before and I'll say it again. Muschamp is a helluva defensive coordinator and defensive coach. One of his biggest strengths is that he stays on the sidelines and when the Auburn offense is on the field, he is over by the benches coaching his defensive players.

At some point in time he may make a good head coach, but if he takes that job, some of what makes him great will have to go away just by definition of the job.

As a head coach he will have to manage the game, and have his head on both sides of the ball. He can't stop paying attention to what is happening on the field just because his team has the ball. His actual "coaching" would have to be limited strictly to the practice field and film rooms.
Posted by LSUGradATL
Warsawa/ATL
Member since Jul 2007
10497 posts
Posted on 12/5/07 at 2:03 pm to
According to Chuck Oliver, GIT powers that be told Radicovich they didnt want a UGA guy coaching GIT. Personally I dont know why they fired Chan, bowl game every year at that school is a great coaching job. Once every 7-10 years he will get them to 10 wins. What more do they want?
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
14738 posts
Posted on 12/5/07 at 2:22 pm to
Tech wants to be a power in the ACC. They seem to forget that they are an engineering school with extremely high academic standards.

Tech can be good - see 1990 - but they will never turn into an annual powerhouse. It would be like Vandy becoming an annual SEC power.

Not sure if you saw Gailey's interviews after he was fired. he said he is probably the only coach to be fired from an NFL job where he went to the playoffs every year and a college job where the team went to a bowl every year.

I had a feeling the Tech boosters wouldn't want a UGA guy as head man, it would be like one of the Rocker brothers being hired at Bama.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram