- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:25 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
Dude, if we took a test on all concepts of football. I'm supremely confident, bordenline Obamaish, in my abilities to answer more questions correctly than you.
lol, doubt that after reading your posts the last few years
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:30 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
lol, doubt that after reading your posts the last few years
You see I wanted to say that in my last post but I held back because I agree with most of your rants.
Did you play football? Any high school or college affaliation will suffice. And before your rant on what does that have to do with football knowledge. Just answer the question.
This post was edited on 11/4/08 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:35 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
Did you play football?
yes
quote:
And before your rant on what does that have to do with football knowledg
I dont know, what does it have to do with it? Very little i think
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:40 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
I dont know, what does it have to do with it? Very little i think
Only people who never played say that. Do food critics that have never cooked critique chefs and expect to be taken seriously?
Nothing I've stated in this thread is false. I've in fact agreed with you in the whole thread yet you are teaching me something.
This post was edited on 11/4/08 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:43 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
Only people who never played say that.
But i played football all my life.
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:45 pm to Lester Earl
Then you get my point. I just want to know what you "taught" me in this thread.
This post was edited on 11/4/08 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:49 pm to L S Usetheforce
just go back and read it
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:50 pm to Lester Earl
I can read..........clarify oh wise one.
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:54 pm to L S Usetheforce
we can call this lesson the "ins and outs or defensive alignments"
Posted on 11/4/08 at 2:56 pm to Lester Earl
the only lesson I'm learning in this thread is the arrogance of postoholics. The SFP disease has spread to you. It's a pandemic. You got served in this thread, yet, you are too arrogant to see it.
This post was edited on 11/4/08 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 11/4/08 at 4:17 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
You got served in this thread
Posted on 11/4/08 at 4:19 pm to Buckeye06
We tried that. It doesn't work. LB's on Harvin that is. But then again we are the only team in the country that has designed offensive play in which the intended receiver is a linebacker in the flats.
Posted on 11/5/08 at 12:16 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
Technically yes but a nickelback just means 5. A fifth DB.
so, then, a dime would mean 10 DBs?
What about this newfangled "quarter"? Would that be 25 DBs? I think we need to run that motherfricker all the time.
This post was edited on 11/5/08 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 11/5/08 at 9:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
We ran a 4-2-5 10 years ago when I was in highschool it is a great scheme. Coach by the name of David Feaster ran it then (im sure others did as well). He was the one who went before the LHSAA, took on Evangel, JCC and all that shite. Then left for Texas.
Posted on 11/6/08 at 11:48 am to Buckeye06
quote:
Doesn't TCU run a 4-2-5?
I think within the next 5 years you're going to have to be able to run both a 4-2-5 as well as a traditional 3-4 or 4-3. The spread is just too big of an influence, and you can't take the chance of your 225 lbs. linebacker getting matched up against a Percy Harvin
It's football, not Rocket Science. There's not that much difference in a 4-3, 3-4 or 4-2-5. I'd probably rather have a faster DB in my base defense to make plays with all the new passing offenses. So Bumpas runs a nickel package as his base defense; what's the problem?. Whatever defense is being run, it just needs to be SIMPLE enough that the LB's and DB's can play it without having to "Think" too much. (See 2008 LSU Defense for example).......
Posted on 11/6/08 at 5:30 pm to TigerBandAlumnus82
we run man cover 2 the majority of the time
it doesn't get much easier than that, imho
it doesn't get much easier than that, imho
Posted on 11/7/08 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
so, then, a dime would mean 10 DBs?
What about this newfangled "quarter"? Would that be 25 DBs? I think we need to run that motherfricker all the time.
Hey Colonel what day you get to put it in SFP and what day you get to put it in LE?
Here is a few articles to describe what I was stating earlier.
LINK
Another
LINK
What is really funny is that you really laughed at that and thought it was a joke.
Posted on 11/7/08 at 1:06 pm to L S Usetheforce
I am usually Colonel on Thursdays.
ETA: Oops, I meant to type that as SFP! Sorry.
ETA: Oops, I meant to type that as SFP! Sorry.
This post was edited on 11/7/08 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 11/7/08 at 2:53 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
L S Usetheforce
yur dum
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News