Started By
Message
locked post

Dana Holgerson

Posted on 12/14/09 at 7:08 pm
Posted by tigerbru17
Billy in 4C
Member since Jan 2009
10270 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 7:08 pm
LINK Any chance in hell we can get this guy..Grew up under Mike Leache of Texas Tech, has developed there QBs and is now in his second year at Houston with an amazing offense and is doing it with a sophmore QB...or do we want to go away from the spread after what we have seen with Gary
Posted by MakeMoney
Guck Foodell
Member since Aug 2008
4329 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 10:19 pm to
Personally, this would be my pick. I wouldn't mind taking the whole offensive staff actually although I do like our recent additions.

Also, it could help us recruit in H-town
This post was edited on 12/14/09 at 10:22 pm
Posted by tigerbru17
Billy in 4C
Member since Jan 2009
10270 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 10:23 pm to
But should we keep the spread?..if so i agree this is the pick we need
Posted by BigBoyTiger
Cleveland
Member since Aug 2005
9578 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

Dana Holgerson


No..I don't want anybody who "learned" under Leach.

That offense doesn't win consistently. Never has and never will.
Posted by MontanaTiger
Montana
Member since Oct 2008
3971 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

amazing offense


The spread is dead. Saban has proven that power football wins out in the end.
Posted by pellietigersaint
Tiger Stadium
Member since Aug 2005
19043 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 11:04 pm to
I played for him at Mississippi College. Good coach but his philosophy is not fit for the SEC. He is a very laid back, players coach. He used to talk to us about va-j-j and things like that. Too loose of a ship for what we need IMO
Posted by MakeMoney
Guck Foodell
Member since Aug 2008
4329 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 11:16 pm to


So we all complain how we don't get the ball to our dozens of playmakers and then you don't want a guy who's extremely less talented playmakers put up ridonkulous numbers??? C'mon man!
Posted by MontanaTiger
Montana
Member since Oct 2008
3971 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

So we all complain


I've never complained about our playing power football. I've never been a fan of the spread. I like pro-style, power football offense. The spread requires too much specialization in personnel and doesn't allow players to showcase their NFL talent, except for wide receivers.
Posted by 7 Moves
Chicago
Member since Sep 2009
2613 posts
Posted on 12/15/09 at 9:33 am to
No, No, No -- We need to run a pro-style offense and not play junk ball. There is a reason that pro teams run pro style offenses -- best way to beat fast and strong defenders. Spurrier, Glanville, and other red gun offenses did NOT work in the NFL.
Posted by MakeMoney
Guck Foodell
Member since Aug 2008
4329 posts
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:12 pm to
I haven't been for the spread either, but majority of our fans complain that we don't get it to our playmakers. If the philosophy of the offense is to be a spread team, why wouldn't you want the OC of one of the best spread teams statistically, who coaches currently in your recruiting area.

If we stay spread I would like Dana. If we were to go pro-style that would be fine by me and many fans. Just saying.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

That offense doesn't win consistently. Never has and never will.



this

quote:

The spread is dead. Saban has proven that power football wins out in the end.



and this
Posted by LSUtigahs28
Member since Sep 2008
14561 posts
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:14 pm to
quote:


That offense doesn't win consistently.


Wat?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram