- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Dana Holgerson
Posted on 12/14/09 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 12/14/09 at 7:08 pm
LINK Any chance in hell we can get this guy..Grew up under Mike Leache of Texas Tech, has developed there QBs and is now in his second year at Houston with an amazing offense and is doing it with a sophmore QB...or do we want to go away from the spread after what we have seen with Gary
Posted on 12/14/09 at 10:19 pm to tigerbru17
Personally, this would be my pick. I wouldn't mind taking the whole offensive staff actually although I do like our recent additions.
Also, it could help us recruit in H-town
Also, it could help us recruit in H-town
This post was edited on 12/14/09 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 12/14/09 at 10:23 pm to MakeMoney
But should we keep the spread?..if so i agree this is the pick we need
Posted on 12/14/09 at 10:39 pm to tigerbru17
quote:
Dana Holgerson
No..I don't want anybody who "learned" under Leach.
That offense doesn't win consistently. Never has and never will.
Posted on 12/14/09 at 10:42 pm to tigerbru17
quote:
amazing offense
The spread is dead. Saban has proven that power football wins out in the end.
Posted on 12/14/09 at 11:04 pm to tigerbru17
I played for him at Mississippi College. Good coach but his philosophy is not fit for the SEC. He is a very laid back, players coach. He used to talk to us about va-j-j and things like that. Too loose of a ship for what we need IMO
Posted on 12/14/09 at 11:16 pm to MontanaTiger
So we all complain how we don't get the ball to our dozens of playmakers and then you don't want a guy who's extremely less talented playmakers put up ridonkulous numbers??? C'mon man!
Posted on 12/14/09 at 11:30 pm to MakeMoney
quote:
So we all complain
I've never complained about our playing power football. I've never been a fan of the spread. I like pro-style, power football offense. The spread requires too much specialization in personnel and doesn't allow players to showcase their NFL talent, except for wide receivers.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 9:33 am to tigerbru17
No, No, No -- We need to run a pro-style offense and not play junk ball. There is a reason that pro teams run pro style offenses -- best way to beat fast and strong defenders. Spurrier, Glanville, and other red gun offenses did NOT work in the NFL.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:12 pm to MontanaTiger
I haven't been for the spread either, but majority of our fans complain that we don't get it to our playmakers. If the philosophy of the offense is to be a spread team, why wouldn't you want the OC of one of the best spread teams statistically, who coaches currently in your recruiting area.
If we stay spread I would like Dana. If we were to go pro-style that would be fine by me and many fans. Just saying.
If we stay spread I would like Dana. If we were to go pro-style that would be fine by me and many fans. Just saying.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:14 pm to MakeMoney
quote:
That offense doesn't win consistently. Never has and never will.
this
quote:
The spread is dead. Saban has proven that power football wins out in the end.
and this
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:14 pm to BigBoyTiger
quote:
That offense doesn't win consistently.
Wat?
Popular
Back to top
5





