Started By
Message
locked post

ARK, FLA & LSU impact

Posted on 12/9/10 at 9:50 am
Posted by LSU0596
Arkansas
Member since Jun 2009
343 posts
Posted on 12/9/10 at 9:50 am
I'd rather Petrino stay at Ark. If he went to Fla we would face a more formidable Fla team EVERY year! Plus Ark would then get Malzahn and still be a very tough opponent.
So.. for us (LSU), really no benefit here.
I would rather face Mullen at Fla and continue to deal with Petrino at Ark beacuse I believe we will out talent Ark most, BUT not all years. Fla will always match our talent and all Petrino needs is a shut down "D" and his teams will be nearly unbeatable.
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
19693 posts
Posted on 12/9/10 at 9:52 am to
I'd agree with that. I'd much rather Patrino stay in Arky. It's never easy to get someone to go to the middle of nowhere to play
Posted by Angry LLAMA
the energy capital of the world
Member since Mar 2009
2731 posts
Posted on 12/9/10 at 9:53 am to
no one will be as formidable as CUM. pretty much any replacement will be a downgrade.

i reason i dont want petrino to fla- is for your exact reason:
quote:

Plus Ark would then get Malzahn and still be a very tough opponent.
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 12/9/10 at 10:23 am to
Wrong

FLA will be formidable anyway. Arkansas on the other hand, without an exceptional coach will suck.


Petrino to FLA
Posted by LSUfan007700
Democratic Party
Member since Sep 2007
2528 posts
Posted on 12/9/10 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Petrino to FLA



I agree. Even though those are two good coaches, both teams would be getting a downgrade
Posted by RANDY44
Member since Aug 2005
9572 posts
Posted on 12/9/10 at 12:44 pm to
You honestly believe Petrino would do better than Urban at UF. I highly doubt that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram