- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

According to DD
Posted on 12/4/08 at 8:18 am
Posted on 12/4/08 at 8:18 am
quote:Link
I am not going to call any names on who I believe will be departing, but I do believe that Les Miles will hire a defensive coordinator. Of course, that does not necessarily mean that Brad Peveto and Doug Mallory will be leaving LSU. Peveto could end up coaching linebackers and Mallory could remain the defensive backfield coach with the defensive coordinator coaching defensive linemen.
I sure hope he's wrong. Bad idea to keep either of these two hanging around. Malveto is a poison in the LSU well.
This post was edited on 12/4/08 at 8:19 am
Posted on 12/4/08 at 8:27 am to JawjaTigah
while I agree with you to not keep them around... dont forget they were both on the staff last year... when we won the National Championship... maybe just together as CO-DCs they are poison
Posted on 12/4/08 at 8:31 am to JawjaTigah
I really don't have a problem with either as position coaches as long as they are coaching their specialty. Peveto is a good recruiter and I really don't think Miles will let Mallory go. We need a solid, name, DC who is a tough arse and will be the teams bad guy.
Posted on 12/4/08 at 8:38 am to Tigerark
I have a problem with this. If LSU is going to bring in a new DC. That DC should be allowed to bring in coaches that he feels would be best suited to run his D.
Posted on 12/4/08 at 8:39 am to guttata
quote:
I have a problem with this. If LSU is going to bring in a new DC. That DC should be allowed to bring in coaches that he feels would be best suited to run his D.
Posted on 12/4/08 at 8:49 am to DTiger
And if he wants 2 position coaches from a Nat'l Champ team that helped coach defenses to top 5 rankings I am sure everyone here will be ok with that.
Posted on 12/4/08 at 8:56 am to guttata
quote:
I have a problem with this. If LSU is going to bring in a new DC. That DC should be allowed to bring in coaches that he feels would be best suited to run his D.
I agree and being that Miles is not a defensive genius, he should not let the new DC also be a positions coach. The new DC needs to be able to watch over the entire defense all the time and not be bothered with coaching one position.
Posted on 12/4/08 at 8:57 am to Tigerark
Question: Why would a "solid" DC accept the position with such preconditions as, "oh, by the way, you need to keep the two guys who you are replacing on your staff"??
A "solid" DC is likely "solid", in part, because of the staff he's had to work with in the past. Wouldn't it make sense for this new DC to, you know, bring along guys who are loyal to him, know his scheme and his system, and who have proven ability to be successful in working w/ the new DC in the past?
Ouch, brain hurts...makes "too much sense"!
A "solid" DC is likely "solid", in part, because of the staff he's had to work with in the past. Wouldn't it make sense for this new DC to, you know, bring along guys who are loyal to him, know his scheme and his system, and who have proven ability to be successful in working w/ the new DC in the past?
Ouch, brain hurts...makes "too much sense"!
Posted on 12/4/08 at 9:02 am to JawjaTigah
One more thing, I never believe anything I hear that comes from DD; however, I do think he is a good man and a great Tiger fan.
Posted on 12/4/08 at 10:17 am to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:Your choice. I have found him to be fairly accurate at times, even though when he misses one it can be a pretty big miss. Hope this is one of those misses.
I never believe anything I hear that comes from DD
Posted on 12/4/08 at 1:08 pm to JawjaTigah
I a new DC is brought in they have to leave. What kinda loyalty would they have for the new DC? It is just plain human nature. If you were replaced by your boss and had to work for the guy who replaced you, How would that be?
Posted on 12/4/08 at 1:12 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
DC should be allowed to bring in coaches that he feels would be best suited to run his D.
+1
quote:
Peveto could end up coaching linebackers and Mallory could remain the defensive backfield coach with the defensive coordinator coaching defensive linemen.
Is that DD's hint that O will be brought in as DC???
Posted on 12/4/08 at 1:30 pm to Suntiger
quote:Don't know. But the best thing I can think of that Coach O would bring to the mix is a heightened/renewed rivalry with a resurgent Ole Miss.
Is that DD's hint that O will be brought in as DC???
Posted on 12/4/08 at 1:35 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:
The new DC needs to be able to watch over the entire defense all the time and not be bothered with coaching one position.
Does the same apply to Crowton and the QB's?
Not just based on this season b/c he had A LOT of work to do with young QB's, but just in general with any OC.
Posted on 12/4/08 at 5:48 pm to SaintLSUnAtl
quote:
really don't have a problem with either as position coaches as long as they are coaching their specialty.
Wasn't one of them the special teams coach and the other defensive backs coach?
If so, we have not had a punt return game for 3 years. Also, have not blocked but 1 kick that I can remember. Since CUM has been at UF they have blocked 40 + punts/fieldgoals.
You may want to rethink your statement.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 7:54 am to specs1
I would hope the AD would step in and handcuff LM if he tried some ignorant shite like that.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 8:12 am to specs1
quote:This is one facet of the game that has really suffered. We're doing a little better this year (IMO) on coverage, but I'm still scratching my head at all the fair catching, and the one dimensional let TH get the ball and squirt around. His speed hasn't produced the kinds of results I think most of us have imagined; I can only think he is not being well-coached on how to use that speed - or the rest of the receiving unit is not being coached well on how to best help TH get loose (without penalties).
we have not had a punt return game for 3 years. Also, have not blocked but 1 kick that I can remember.
The other part of special teams is the kicking dept, as per kick-offs I mean. When is the last time our kicker has kicked into the end zone?
C'mon, anybody who can go for a 63 year field goal can kick the ball into the end zone. There must be some kind of coaching strategy to hold the kicks short. I can see it once in a while, but what sense does that make every single time?
Posted on 12/5/08 at 8:35 am to specs1
quote:
Wasn't one of them the special teams coach and the other defensive backs coach?
If so, we have not had a punt return game for 3 years. Also, have not blocked but 1 kick that I can remember. Since CUM has been at UF they have blocked 40 + punts/fieldgoals.
You may want to rethink your statement.
One was the LB coach and the other the DB coach. Prior to this year, our LB's and DB's were just fine. Could have used some more talent at LB, but the play wasn't lacking. Peveto coach special teams, which he was terrible at, which is why he was stripped of that duty.
They didn't work well as Co-DC's but they did fine when they coached only positions. I didn't mean to put BDP back at special teams, only LB's.
And we blocked a FG vs. Bama this year, a FG vs. Ohio St. last year, and a punt in 2005 vs. Arizona St. I know that sucks pretty bad, I was just pointing out the very few we have blocked. I can't remember any others either.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 8:47 am to SaintLSUnAtl
quote:
Prior to this year, our LB's were just fine.
Hell No!
Posted on 12/5/08 at 8:52 am to specs1
quote:
Since CUM has been at UF they have blocked 40 + punts/fieldgoals.
Is this true?
Popular
Back to top

6






