- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How does the OT feel about boats parked in the driveway?
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:33 am to Napoleon
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:33 am to Napoleon
Napoleon, JP does it as well, but don't enforce as much.
Had to modify my inlaws fence and extend their driveway into backyard for their small RV and they live on a large piece of property.
But it wasn't behind their fence.
Had to modify my inlaws fence and extend their driveway into backyard for their small RV and they live on a large piece of property.
But it wasn't behind their fence.
0
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:35 am to fishfighter
Again look at these and tell me if it would have been an issue if people did what the 2nd pic did?
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:37 am to Salmon
quote:
like...way down the list
Not really. It's a pretty big thing for me. I would definitely pay more to be in an equal house in a neighborhood where people don't park thein toys in the front of their house. There's a direct relation to the amount of campers and boats in people's driveways and the price to live in that area.
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:37 am to upgrayedd
quote:
You understand that people like to fish in more than one place, right?
Fishing in more than one place is trashy.
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:37 am to Napoleon
My HOA has a rule against it. I don't have one, but DGAF if others leave them in their driveway. Why should that bother someone?
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:39 am to Napoleon
It sounds like this guy uses his jetskis once every couple of years and wants the people who use their boats regularly to find a marina 3 states away to store them during the week.
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:40 am to dabigfella
quote:
dabigfella
My question is "Does it matter whether the vehicle is a junky boat or a junky car"?
Why is one allowed and the other isn't? Both are vehicles that have become eyesores. Mandate acceptable standards but do not limit legititmate boat owner's rights
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:41 am to DatNolaClap
no it sounds like this guy lives in houston but has a vacation home in florida, so when he's in houston he doesn't play with jet skis and when he goes to florida he plays with them but instead of taking up the elevator and leaving them parked inside his condo, he pays the enormous sum of $260/mo to park them.
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:41 am to junkfunky
quote:
You understand that people like to fish in more than one place, right?
That's next on the agenda for Kenner to ban
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:43 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
Why is one allowed and the other isn't? Both are vehicles that have become eyesores. Mandate acceptable standards but do not limit legititmate boat owner's rights
if you're asking me, I think the trashy project cars need to be banned as well. Again, oddly enough when you drive through nicer areas you dont see the trashy boats or cars. If this wasn't such a rampant issue, they wouldn't have made a point of changing the rule? All this took was a collaboration on the parts of people to cover their eye sore boats and this would have never happened. Should the government have begun to fine people instead? I do believe that, but they chose this route, what can you do?
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:45 am to Salmon
quote:No doubt. But what keeps the property values high? Demand. What drives demand? A strong local economy i.e. jobs. I once had an offer of $150K/year but didn't move to the town because of all the boats parked in the front of houses....said no one fricking ever.
It is in the best interest of the government for the property values (read: property taxes) to remain high
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:46 am to White Bear
people who make $150k/year dont live in $150k homes with boats that cost $5000 rotting away in the front yard -- said 99% of people who made over $150k
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:47 am to dabigfella
You moved to Houston to get away from our trashiness can you please stay out of our threads as well please? This doesnt concern you anymore. Stick to your wednesday poker night where you and your Aggie brothers take turns seeing how many chips you can shove up each other bums. 
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:47 am to White Bear
A quick search shows that it would cost $150/mo to park your boat at a public storage center.
That's gotta suck for Kenner boatowners
That's gotta suck for Kenner boatowners
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:49 am to Tigeralum2008
lol dont even bother, their "rights" are more important than $150/mo
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:51 am to dabigfella
quote:
lol dont even bother, their "rights" are more important than $150/mo
I like how you put quotations to refer to property rights - you know, the basis of Anglo-American culture and government. Sorry, negative rights don't stop existing just because it affects a bottom line.
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:51 am to dabigfella
quote:I reckon we can sit here an "what if" and split hairs all afternoon, it boils down to mis-guided government exerting more control over the citizens.
people who make $150k/year dont live in $150k homes with boats that cost $5000 rotting away in the front yard -- said 99% of people who made over $150k
This post was edited on 12/8/16 at 11:52 am
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:52 am to HempHead
quote:
Do these people not have a right to use their property as they see fit?
Only if said use doesn't negatively affect others.
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:52 am to White Bear
exert control to protect the rest of us from those boat owners who dont know how to properly upkeep a boat and keep it clean and put a cover on it.
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:53 am to MikeBRLA
quote:
Only if said use doesn't negatively affect others.
I'm genuinely interested in asking this - is there precedent for litigation for indirect loss of property value? I'm going to guess no.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News