Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7
Registered on:4/17/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Since most of our society now sees marriage as a temporary contract, it makes sense under those terms.

If we are talking about a lifelong covenant marriage when "the two become one" then absolutely not.

I really think two types of women do this. Lefties, who hate traditional customs, and women who are clueless about what a real marriage means.
That may be what Joe Bob's Church on the corner teaches, but that isn't what the church that Jesus Christ founded in 33AD teaches.
The fact that choose to disregard 1,500 years of consistent Christian tradition is really arrogant.

Please tell us in your expert opinion what Jesus was referring to? Ok, now realize that some really smart theologians disagree with you.

I think if I have to side with someone, I think I will go with Thomas Aquinas over DupontsCircle.
The tranny issue and women in combat arms MOSs are connected. As long as you have trannies serving, how can you tell any woman she can't be in a combat arms MOS? If 0311 LCpl Steve now thinks he is a chic and the DoD agrees, we now have chics in the infantry by definition.

Bottom line is trannies need mental help, not weapons. Women need to continue to serve in support MOSs, like most service members do.

NO ONE has a right to be in the military. NO ONE has a right to be in combat arms.

If a personnel decision doesn't forward the military's main mission of killing people and breaking things, then it needs to be done away with.