Favorite team:Arizona State 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:295
Registered on:9/23/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I get why he's in the portal. He's probably going to go from $2 mil to 3-4. He'll probably play for a team better equipped to contend as ASU seems to be losing a lot, especially if the juniors (Brown, Fite and Abney) go pro.

I'm just saying the situations weren't comparable. He's looking for greener pastures and #5 really needed to be somewhere else.

Also, ASU athletics is partnered with the Mayo Clinic so I'm not sure there are many better places to rehab.
Most of the ASU people in the Daniels video were kind of scrubs.

Daniels was leaving a team with NCAA sanctions that involved his (well-meaning) mom. It was time to get off the sinking ship.

Leavitt's situation is that he's leaving a stable, good culture because there's presumably someone with more money and more talent to put around him.
He doesn't have an agent and wouldn't interview during the regular season, so during the start of the search he wouldn't have been an option.

Lucky for Penn State if this is true.

re: What happens if BYU wins over TT

Posted by wablty on 12/4/25 at 1:06 pm to
Correct. The committee isn't going to risk the massive temper tantrum Bama would throw if they went back on their word about the losers of conference championship games not being penalized. SMU wasn't bounced last year. They won't bounce Bama this year.

Notre Dame is preferable to BYU even though BYU's resume indicates they should be in the #6-8 range. Thus BYU at #11 because if they were at #10 and lost, the committee would be breaking their word. But, if BYU gets in anyway, leaving out a 2-loss ND without any really great wins isn't the end of the world.

Realistically, the ND vs. Miami argument should be moot. The top 10 should be the two undefeated teams, the six 1-loss teams and then Oklahoma and Bama as the 2-loss teams with the best resume.

It would be a lot simpler if they weren't trying as hard as they can to get Notre Dame in.
I kind of wonder about the BYU placement from the Committee at #11. Pretty strange considering what was said going into this season about the committee valuing record strength.

I suspect there's some CYA involved. Last year, SMU stayed in the playoffs after losing their conference championship game. Yeah, there were some 3-loss SEC teams that thought they should have moved in, but there was also a 2-loss BYU that beat SMU head to head (on the road). But they promised not to hold losing the CCG against a team, so SMU's still in.

Now this year we've got an 11-1 BYU with a pretty strong case, but they did kind of get rolled when they played Texas Tech. We don't want all those 1st round blowouts again. So how do you prevent going back on your word that conference championship games won't penalize the loser? You do it by deliberately keeping them out of range of receiving an at large bid in the first place.

It also probably doesn't help BYU that the two selection committee members that withdrew this year were both Big 12 people, and the only remaining Big 12 affiliated representative left is the AD of Utah, who I am sure would be just devastated if BYU was left out.

re: Why is Texas Tech ahead of Ole Miss?

Posted by wablty on 11/26/25 at 11:30 am to
You looking at the same ESPN that I am?

Ole Miss is 33. BYU is 27.

LINK

re: Why is Texas Tech ahead of Ole Miss?

Posted by wablty on 11/26/25 at 9:36 am to
Better question is why is Ole Miss 4 spots ahead of BYU.

They have the same record. BYU has a stronger SOS. BYU has a stronger SOR.

They both lost their only games to 10-1 teams ranked above them. They both have one significant win.

Two very similar resumes with a slight metric advantage for BYU, but a 4 rank difference that's enough to likely keep BYU out of the playoffs unless they win their conference.

re: Playoff rankings just released

Posted by wablty on 11/26/25 at 1:11 am to
BYU is getting screwed in the rankings in what, I suspect, is a deliberate attempt to keep them out of an at large spot should they be the Big 12 CCG loser. That way they won't have to punish someone for losing the conference championship as they're making sure they won't be in that position in the first place.

From a resume standpoint, it's pretty stupid that a 1-loss team with the #6 SOR (1 spot ahead of Ole Miss) is being valued where it is.
Unless Avery Johnson makes some massive, future #1 draft pick leap, K State ain't winning the Big 12. Or really in contention unless they cannibalize to an 8-4 or 9-3 CCG participant.

Utah, Baylor or ASU would be the best bets IMO. Maybe Iowa State.
I hope it goes to OT. I want to know what happens first- Stanford QB throws a pick 6 to lose it or Hawaii's QB's leg falls off on live television. Or he somehow limps in on a scramble for the gamewinner.
My understanding is there some definite "Anti-Jock" sentiment.
Institutional support is pretty bad. David Shaw was a good coach and it just fell apart the last few years.
Kansas was kinda scary though. Kind of like Vandy. They sucked, but they were sort of nice too.

Beat 3 teams that were in the last top 25 rankings of the CFP committee, and lost 3 by a cumulative 13 points. That's more top 25 wins at the playoff decision time than anyone but Oregon and Georgia, the #1 and #2 seeds.

Conversely, Missouri faced two teams in that top 25 and lost both. @South Carolina was a close one I guess.

I get you gotta talk shite, but maybe let that dog lie? Those dudes played 8 teams out of 12 that won 9 or more games and by and large were pretty competitive.

re: "WV To SEC"?

Posted by wablty on 8/10/25 at 2:14 am to
The ASU/LSU series back in the day would have been awesome, but Katrina*.

*Early Doucet did drop that TD.

I think it's actually supposed to happen in 2029/2030? The 05 game was a classic. I'd recommend a visit if you're still traveling for games.

re: "WV To SEC"?

Posted by wablty on 8/10/25 at 1:45 am to
Locked On podcasts have fully gone into sensationalism. They just deal in conspiracy theories and it's intentional. Imagine "Ancient Aliens" but for CFB when they don't have actual football to cover.

The only promotion candidates to the B1G or SEC that I can see are the former Pac 12 corner teams and maybe Kansas for the shooty hoops brand if that still matters. Maybe Tech I guess?

re: UTx fans know this

Posted by wablty on 8/1/25 at 3:53 pm to
I want to see someone make an argument as for why Texas, who will probably be the #1 team in the country to start the season or at least top 2 or 3, is significantly higher ranked than the team we saw play them to double OT (Arizona State) and returns far, far more.

Other than economically not up to snuff. This is preseason cooking. ASU might regress, ASU might suck, but whoever beats them isn't going to get anywhere near the reward and they won't have anywhere near the ranking shield.

This is just more blatant than normal.
I think the Arizona State vs. LSU is the reboot of the reboot of the mid 2000's series that got fricked up by Katrina.

That was supposed to be @LSU but hurricane bad. The 05 game went to Tempe, but proceeds went to Katrina relief. It was a classic too. ASU more or less dominated, but LSU got back into it with special teams and then Russell hit a 4th and a prayer from the 40* or so with a buck and change left.

*Early Doucet dropped it but replay was in its infancy and call on the field was TD. ASU fans would have bitched about it, but you can't because, y'know. Hurricane. Who's gonna grump about a bad call?

Then because LSU didn't get their scheduled home game and ASU didn't get to profit from its abrupt home game, things got moved around. And moved around. And moved around. I've been looking forward to an ASU vs. LSU game for a very long time. Games just kept getting punted down the road.

Florida vs. ASU also seems like a really fun time. I didn't know we had that scheduled. I am to understand that you Gator fans enjoy cocktail parties. ASU fans are also known for partaking in such activities.
Try enforcing that $600 limit. Everyone has lawyers that can make it fine. If not, bag men.
ACC and Big 12 will be up. Might still cannibalize, but they have a bunch of QBs that can play and the #1 and #2 teams in the country in terms of returning production are playoff teams from those conferences (Clemson and ASU).

Clemson might be a legitimate Natty contender if their DL is all its made out to be.
There aren't many gimme's.

New Mexico and Northwestern are probably easy dubs, but that's a lot of 35/65s or 40/60's. They'll get some. I thought they were looking a little salty after the murderer's row run in the 1st half of their season, but that's a struggle for 6-6 unless they really pull something out of their arse.

You're right though. 4-8 is far, far more likely than 8-4. My B.