ibewritegood

quote:

---

Bottom line is your team barely beat an unmotivated LSU team. Congrats on your chicken trophy.

---

We knew that would be the excuse all along. Doesn't make a frick to me.

Your team was physically beat on the lines of scrimmage (at least on offense), and you couldn't move the ball on a team that NC State racked up 600 yards of offense on.

That's not motivation. That's getting your arse beat, regardless of the score.

But tell yourself whatever it takes to make you feel better.

So did LSU lose their motivation before or after they lost a 2 possession lead? Did Clemson suddenly get motivated when they lost their best player and spotted you 7 points?

I just need to get this straight so I can remember in future conversations about the game.

quote:

---

Oh they hope a miracle happens and LSU does not show up for the game and they turn it into a track meet. They could hang in that type of game. Look respectable and maybe win at the end somehow.

But the truth is Clem fans know they are going to get absolutely bitch slapped by LSU if LSU is motivated.

Deep down the ones I talk to just hope they are not completely embarrassed. Every team they play with a pulse kicks their arse. Every actual physical team they play beats them up. That's why you hear their head clown Daba Swindler yapping so much about their "PHYSICAL" practices.....LOL! He knows he has to pretend they are physical. As you know they are not. They are a pretty little team that can out run the acc crap they play.

Clem fans know and hell I bet Datboy knows.....LSU is going to punch those punks in the nose and make them cry.

---

I'm glad you acknowledge the arbitrary notion that if LSU loses, it will be because they don't show up. This is such an astute and well-reasoned perspective.

Obviously, if LSU wins, it's because they are the better team and will have nothing to do with on-field misfortunes and gaffes on the part of Clemson.

By virtue of this unreasonable Catch 22 scenario laid forth by the SEC legion, Clemson is damned if they do, and damned if they don't. I'll be observing the team on the field and draw my own conclusions. If we win, I'm likely to unleash hell on this board. If we lose, I'll come back and talk shite about Dabo and eat my crow.

Otherwise, you seem like a typical Coot idiot. It's nice to see you so concerned with Clemson's bowl game. Perhaps you should find a hobby...one that doesn't involve being a mouthbreathing, knuckle-dragging dumbass.

quote:

---

It is when you are Clemson and have been a running joke around the rest of the country for nearly the length of your football existence.

---

No. It's really not. Not by any measurable or reasonable standard, anyway.

Your anecdotes are cute, but that doesn't mean you're still not a fricking retard for thinking that last year's game has any bearing on this one.

We'll know soon enough.

quote:

---

They posted the same thing last year before WV hung 70 points on them....

---

Yeah! Because it's a fact that previous results are indicative of future outcomes.

You must have been one frick of a statistics student!

quote:

---

go back to your shitty board. your commentary is unwanted here. Your team sucks balls. You suck balls. DIE.

---

Gee, you're so fricking cool, bro.

quote:

---

pawfense will be lucky to score 14 and get 350 yards.

---

Yeah, that wasn't the point of the thread. But that could just be my reading comprehension acting up again.

Considering the rock isn't a fricking mascot, I'd have to go with the former.

quote:

---

Sherman was the first president of LSU.

---

So you claim an Ohioan who worked at your university for 4 years as one of your own? Seems legit.

quote:

---

they scored 27 against us..... their avg for the season was 45...

it is a relevant example.

---

Don't ever play roulette.