TigerStick

The bar is to make the playoffs. He didn't have to build a roster, we went out and bought one. And the best one in the country at that.

Alot of playoff contenders have new QB's, we are not unique.
And the schedule is no harder than anyone else in the conference. And with Clemson sucking, our OOC is actually pretty manageable.

No excuses, You spent all this money and got everything you asked for. Time to deliver.

We are not losing two games in Nov and getting into the playoffs.

Look at A&M, Bama, Texas, Tenn....we have to go 3-1 in those.

Kentucky, Auburn, State - we have to go 3-0 in those.

Seems unlikely.

Id rather we defer. Force the fans to calm down while their offense has the ball, and we put our best unit on the field.

And I prefer to score first in the second half and set the tone.

I think it would be fun as a fan. Road trips to Michigan, Ohio, Penn State, LA, Oregon. Even Iowa would be cool.

People will say they want to stay for tradition, but I'm 46 and the SEC is not what it used to be. It was perfect as a 12 team league with two divisions - the new version is a different mix of cultures (at least in my mind).

So if we're going to change it up, why not go for something completely new and interesting?

:geauxtigers:

quote:

---

London:
62g/ 60gs/ 3,961yds/ 22TD/ 8.0 ytg
Catch: 309/497 62.2%

Olave:
55g/44gs/ 3,728yds/ 19TD/ 8.2 ytg
Catch: 291/457 63.7%


London with 7 extra games and only +3 TD's/ 233yds. Olave also left early in atleast 4 games. Olave is better, London is healthier.

This is Olave's last 3 games with Shough. I'll take that upside > London.

3gm/ 352yds/ 4 TDs
Catch: 24/ 36 66.7%

---

You have to factor in durability. If he's not on the field, it puts alot of pressure on the rest of the offense.

How about on 3rd and 7?

We are the only team without a conference win. And one of those losses is to the second worse team.

It's not working. You need a change to get a spark.

not bad but would prefer edge at 8 (Bain if he's there). And OL at 42.

We haven't seen MVB under LK. He might look better than Chambliss for all we know. It's not like Chambliss is physically more gifted than MVB (at least that I can tell).

Always a good idea to bring in new guys for competition, but I'd be interested to see what we have in MVB.

What is he supposed to say?

I'd take Mendoza. 6'5" with 70%+ completion percentage playing against superior talent (compared to his team). it may not work out, but if it does you're set for a long time.