- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | Georgia Tech |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 30 |
| Registered on: | 12/7/2008 |
| Online Status: |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
you sir know your football
Well, to be fair, everything I know about option football (other than loving to watch it when it is well run), I have learned since PJ got hired last december. Ive read a lot of websites discussing the different offenses and how they developed. Part of it was figuring out all the technical terms so you can see the differences between say, what Urban Meyer is doing and what Paul Johnson is doing and what Rich Rod is failing to do.
Oh, and OT, Thanks for Anthony Allen. He has been impressive in practice this year, from what I have heard. I live in the ville, was at the MTSU game last year when he ran all over them.
re: Mark May just called GTech a "spread" offense
Posted by gtne91 on 12/31/08 at 11:55 am to PiscesTiger
quote:
This is NOT a wing t that GA Tech runs.
Absolutely. Technically a wing requires a back behind a TE to form the wing. Without the TE, he becomes a slot back and it isnt a wing. GT doesnt use a Tight End (accept in some short yardage type situations and it is someone else playing it. We dont have a TE on our roster).
re: Herbstreet just said GT by 20
Posted by gtne91 on 12/31/08 at 10:57 am to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
Yes. Va Tech's computer ranking got a HUGE boost... because they played (and got blownout) against LSU.
Not (necessarily) true. In the Colley, for example, a loss will always hurt you. Although, a loss to LSU last year would hurt almost none at all. Also, the BCS wont let the computers consider score, so getting blown out by LSU made no difference and thats the way the BCS bigwigs want it.
Looking at last year's Colley (which had VT #2 and OSU #4), VT had the #24 SOS and OSU the #73.
OSU's problem was a weak conference and OOC wins over the #77, 98 and 113 teams + Youngstown St. Illinois at #18 was the only top 20 team and you lost it.
VT lost to #1 and #11. They also beat #11 and the rest of their schedule wasnt nearly as weak as OSU's.
re: Mark May just called GTech a "spread" offense
Posted by gtne91 on 12/31/08 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
a classic spread team is texas tech or the mumme air raid scheme
Actually, a classic spread team would be Dutch Meyer's TCU spread with Sammy Baugh as QB. He wrote the book on the spread in 1952:
Spread Formation Football available from Amazon (expensive too).
BTW, TT is the Mumme air raid scheme. Leach was his OC at Kentucky. Leach has changed it a bit since they separated, but thats football evolution.
The Air Raid was actually a derivative of BYU's offense. Im sure it was greatly influenced by Meyer's TCU offense.
10-7 actually. And closer than the score. We blocked at the end to prevent OT.
To understand that game see Michigan. We played our 3rd and 4th string QBs. Our 3rd stringer is pure drop back passer and, uh, we didnt have any of that part of our offense implemented yet, so he had to run the option.
To understand that game see Michigan. We played our 3rd and 4th string QBs. Our 3rd stringer is pure drop back passer and, uh, we didnt have any of that part of our offense implemented yet, so he had to run the option.
re: Herbstreet just said GT by 20
Posted by gtne91 on 12/31/08 at 9:59 am to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
How did Va Tech deserve it over OSU?
SOS I assume. I dont know. All i know is that the BCS computers had VT #1, LSU #2 and Ohio St #3.
Looking at the breakdown, 2 computers had OSU #1, one had LSU #1, and 3 had VT #1. 2 computers had OSU #5, so Im guessing your SOS sucked last year.
re: Mark May just called GTech a "spread" offense
Posted by gtne91 on 12/31/08 at 9:51 am to N.O. via West-Cal
quote:
it has been interesting to hear about what their offense does and how it could morph into more of a pass happy offense in the future.
It will never* be pass happy. The mix will change some, maybe from 85/15 to about 70/30. With games where teams sell out to stop the run so the mix may even favor pass for the game. As the year went on, we saw much more trips formation and less of only the double slot formation. More proficiency in running the run-an-shoot package will just add another element the defense has to worry about.
One thing I like about the mix is that the zone blitz was basically created to shut down the run-and-shoot. Regular blitzes got eaten alive by the r&s. However, blitzing against the TO is a quick form of suicide. Blitz to stop the R&S and the TO takes it to the house. Play base defense to stop the TO and the R&S will pick you apart.
We wont see much of it tonight, but I like our future.
*never is a long long time. Who knows what the future really holds.
re: Mark May just called GTech a "spread" offense
Posted by gtne91 on 12/31/08 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
mouse davis is the true father of the run and shoot
Davis popularized it. He turned it into the pass happy offense we are familiar with. He put the QB in the shotgun. He isnt its father. Or, if you want, he can be the father, but Ellison is the grandfather.
Ellison designed it to be a run first offense, hence the name. If the D put too many men in the box, the QB would check to a "shoot" play instead.
Davis learned the offense from Ellison.
re: Mark May just called GTech a "spread" offense
Posted by gtne91 on 12/31/08 at 8:27 am to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
They can call it what they want but its not more than the wing-t.
Wing T is a single wing formation. This, if anything, is a double wing. Also, the winged T used Tight Ends.
Part of the distinction is the lack of use of Tight Ends. The ends are "spread" out.
re: Herbstreet just said GT by 20
Posted by gtne91 on 12/31/08 at 8:11 am to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
You can't find a more deserving team
Virginia Tech. They were #1 in the computer rankings of the final BCS standings last year. Yeah LSU had already thrashed them, yeah VT never shows up for bowl games so LSU would have thrashed them again. But, then again, LSU thrashed you all, so whats the diffference?
If the BCS would get rid of the biased human voters (and allow the computers to use MOV again) and maybe add another half dozen computers, so that after dropping hi/lo you still are averaging 10, then, well, it would still be a stupid system.
re: Mark May just called GTech a "spread" offense
Posted by gtne91 on 12/31/08 at 8:05 am to Ponchy Tiger
The spread is a formation not an offense. GT plays out of a spread formation. 4+ wideouts (2 WR, 2 slots, although our slots are tighter than in most modern spreads), single back max, wide line splits. These are the characteristics of the spread formation. What plays you run after that is beside the point, you are running them from the spread.
Our formation is very similar, as pointed out above, to Tiger Ellison's original run-and-shoot, before Mouse Davis got hold of it. Ga Southern was running r-and-s the year before Johnson took over as OC. My understanding is that Erk wanted to switch to the I and have more power running, Johnson convinced him to stay with the spread formation, added option elements and, as the 101 video showed, could run I plays via quick motion while keeping pre-snap balance.
The offense evolved thru GSU, Hawaii and Navy (losing most of the run-and-shoot elements at Navy because they didnt have the QBs to run it).
Both Johnson and Leach have noted the similarity of the offenses GT and TT run. Most people would think they couldnt be more different, but the similarities are in the details, not the play calling.
Our formation is very similar, as pointed out above, to Tiger Ellison's original run-and-shoot, before Mouse Davis got hold of it. Ga Southern was running r-and-s the year before Johnson took over as OC. My understanding is that Erk wanted to switch to the I and have more power running, Johnson convinced him to stay with the spread formation, added option elements and, as the 101 video showed, could run I plays via quick motion while keeping pre-snap balance.
The offense evolved thru GSU, Hawaii and Navy (losing most of the run-and-shoot elements at Navy because they didnt have the QBs to run it).
Both Johnson and Leach have noted the similarity of the offenses GT and TT run. Most people would think they couldnt be more different, but the similarities are in the details, not the play calling.
quote:
For instance this year....could either OU or Florida look Texas in the eye and say "we were better than you"???
Not only this, I think there are 9 teams with somewhat legit arguments (at this time, after the bowls, I a good half of them will have to say "never mind").
Boise St, Utah. Who has proven they are better than them yet?
Oklahoma, Texas, Texas Tech.
Alabama, Florida.
USC and Penn St.
quote:
Somehow, Gardner-Webb held GT to a whopping 79 yds rushing (47 attempts!) and 120 passing, only 9 first downs, and outgained them 227-199 Losing to GT by only 10-7. How difficult can it be?
Seriously, I'd like to see film of that game.
Watch film of any Michigan game.
For the GW game, we didnt have an option QB available. We played our 3rd and 4th string, one is a drop back QB and the other is a redshirt freshman walkon.
We ran the option anyway, because that is the only offense we had installed at that point.
Add to that one of our starting linebackers having seizures on the sideline and that kind of takes the players minds out of the game. We were playing poorly before that happened, so that might not have changed anything, but it didnt help.
re: lacewell visits lsu to help with triple option
Posted by gtne91 on 12/19/08 at 10:04 am to NorfolkVATiger
quote:
The Georgia Tech guys are saying he coached Arkansas State to a playoff victory over Paul Johnson's Georgia Southern way back in the day.
Uh, you have it backwards. 48-21 GSU over Arkansas St back in 1986, in the National Championship game.
PJ was OC at the time.
quote:
I believe they take full advantage when a team overloads the box, and leaves the too much open. Discipline will be the key.
Yep, that is what happened in the Duke game. They sold out to stop the run and we threw for 230 yards in that game. Still only 9 completed passes, but by far the biggest passing day of the year.
quote:
Tech runs the ball greater than 4 times as they pass (600 runs vs 140 pass attempts). They complete just 47% of passes
However, Tech averages 8.1 yards per pass ATTEMPT, which is #21 in the nation. LSU is #71 at 6.7 ypa. So, while we rarely pass, and complete rarely, our average is very high. We throw deep, when we hit, we hit big.
Edit: 14 of 140 attempts have gone for a 25+ yard gain. By comparison 22 of 364 LSU pass attempts have gone for a 25+ yard gain.
re: Here's What Tech Fans Are Saying
Posted by gtne91 on 12/17/08 at 5:04 pm to Geauxtigers468
quote:
They could play Boise State again.
I dont think we have ever played Boise St.
quote:
Somebody's got to be able to do something clever with the fact that a bunch of so-called engineers have an 8-lane freeway running through the middle of their campus.
It should be pointed out that Tech expanded past the interstate, not the other way around. When I graduated in 1991, we were still entirely west of the connector. Im pretty sure it was built where it is to avoid going thru the Tech campus.
But, other than that, yeah there is probably a good joke in there somewhere.
re: Here's What Tech Fans Are Saying
Posted by gtne91 on 12/17/08 at 9:20 am to JudgeBoyett
quote:
They haven't won shite in 20 years.
1990 was only 18 years ago.
re: GT putting in "run and shoot" prior to bowl game...(LINK)
Posted by gtne91 on 12/16/08 at 11:45 am to cincyjacket
Dont worry cincy, I got it even if doc or hivered didnt. :nana:
quote:
Run and shoot from the flexbone? Now, that's something I'd like to see.
See Ga Southern/Hawaii film from when Johnson was OC at them. Not as much as HC at GSU or at all at Navy.
Also, Tiger Ellison's original run and shoot was from a formation very, very similar to the flexbone. Two WRs, two slotbacks, QB under center, 1 running back is standard original run and shoot formation. The flexbone slotbacks are a little tighter probably, but not much. The original (pre Mouse Davis) run and shoot was a run first offense, hence the name. If the D overloaded the box, the QB checked into a "shoot" play.
Davis was responsible for moving the QB back into the shotgun and making it a pass first offense.
Popular
0











