TheLSUDynasty

quote:

---

So do you not believe they were ever a threat, period, in terms of becoming “nuclear armed?”

Or do you believe it simply didn’t need to be addressed at this stage in history, under this administration?

Help me understand the outright dismissal of a nuclear-armed Iran.

---

Honestly, no, I don't think Iran was a major threat at this point. Israel, as well as U.S. sanctions, had already weakened Iran significantly. I don't believe Iran needed to be addressed.

The focus right now needs to be on domestic issues. Trump ran on no new wars. Now he has us in another forever war in the Middle East. I voted for Trump, and he betrayed many of his supporters on this issue.

Help me understand, what was June 2025 all about? I thought we eliminated Iran's nuclear capabilities then?

And answer this for me, what happens when the U.S. inevitably ends this war? How long before Iran is "2-3 days away" again? At that point all of this is for nothing and we wasted our time.

quote:

---

Iran was like 2 maybe 3 days away from nuclear capability….we had to step in

---

So then what was June 2025 all about? I thought we wiped out their nuclear capability then?

What happens when the U.S. ends the war? How long before Iran is "2 or 3 days away" again and all of this was for nothing? Even if Iran got a nuke, who's to say they would use it against the U.S.? Israel, sure, but just like North Korea they wouldn't have the delivery mechanism.

Plus Iran knows that they launch one nuke against the U.S., they'll have hundreds of nukes immediately heading right back to Iran.

I'm sorry but I just flat out don't believe this. This is the same "weapons of mass destruction" BS we were fed for the Iraq war.

quote:

---

you're kidding a bright young boy like you hasn't been snatched off the market by a smart young girl to start a family? i can't imagine why! after all you lost a thousand dollars betting on LSU so you're a financial genius! let's face facts boy the closest you're ever going to get to a real woman is your hand and the internet. don't worry kid, p*ssy is highly overrated, that's why it wins every time.

---

Who ever said I wanted kids? I don’t particularly care about getting married either.

Americans would sacrifice and choose higher gas prices if we were actually defending the country.

We have no reason being at war with Iran. Simply re-iterate with Iran that if they send one nuke our way, we send 200 nukes immediately to Iran and turn Iran into one big radioactive parking lot.

Become energy independent here in the U.S. and even an energy exporter. Invest in more output here, including development of alternative energy sources.

The best way to beat Iran is to make them largely irrelevant. Make it to where the world doesn't need any Iranian oil or Middle Eastern oil, and let the Middle East live in the dark ages and destroy each other.

I don't choose higher gas prices over the BS forever warn we're in with Iran currently.

$4.30 here in Florida. I paid $4.25 but that was with a 5 cent off using an app. This is going to crush Republicans in the midterms.

quote:

---

I would help my two Grandsons escape the country, rather than defend Israel. I gave the US Navy seven years, during the cold war and am proud of it.


Just think, Israel killed dozens of innocent Sailors on the USS Liberty, wounded over a hundred, then pretended it never happened.
Who would defend or trust those lying a holes.

---

I don't have any sons but if I did I would as well. I would absolutely get them over to Canada or Europe and give them every cent I have.

I think the MIC and the U.S. Government severely underestimate how many men are no longer even remotely willing to give their lives for this country, especially in a senseless war or a war on behalf of another country.

quote:

---

What is your suggestion for mom and dad both getting drafted?

---

Yes it is. Women need to start truly realize that with rights come responsibilities. Being a Man, unlike what they want to believe, isn't all it's cracked up to be. Men have a lot of disadvantages that most Women will never face. The military draft being one of those.

You don't get to pick and choose when you want to be "equal" and when you want "traditional values".

I fully support women being equal to men. But that means equal responsibility as well. Women don't get to have the advantages of being Men without the disadvantages.

In terms of children, again most women now don't even want children so it's not the big "gotcha" you think it is. But let's say a man and a woman in the military have children. I'm okay with one of them being stationed at a home based position, as long as it's not the woman by default, but instead whichever parent it is easier to have be stationed stateside.

quote:

---

The 19th Amendment should have made draft eligibility a condition of the franchise.

---

I agree. If women truly want equal rights, then that means equal responsibility as well. The feminists always conveniently ignore that part of it.

Some of this has been my thought for awhile, but some of it was also the sham Fox News panel that blamed men for there being 30 million single men in this country.

Everything is man's fault here in the U.S. Literally everything. Women want equality but do not want any of the responsibility of that equality. Women scream misogyny when men do anything, while blatantly ignoring the misandry against men.

Women like to argue "it's a woman's world now" or "we don't need men anymore." We all know that's until sh*t hits the fan. You never hear feminists talk about the unconstitutionality of a male only military draft. And if it ever came down to it, they would gladly draft men and make men have to make the ultimate sacrifice. This could happen if we went all in on the Iran war.

I know the likelihood of it happening isn't great. But the chance is still there. If a military draft occurred again, should Men just refuse outright? Should Men refuse unless Women are also drafted and serve in equal numbers?

Why should Men even bother defending a country that utterly hates them?

quote:

---

For the 1000th time, no one is mad that Lane left.....Lane did alot of good things for the program. The MANNER in which he left is a different story.
You could do it the right way(Sumrall at Tulane) or you could try and burn the program to the ground, like Lane did.
The guy is a morally bankrupt POS.

---

Kiffin literally begged to coach Ole Miss in the playoffs and to try to lead you all to a National Title. It was your arrogant AD who cost Ole Miss it's best chance to win a National Title in 60 years.

That will be a decision your fan base will come to greatly regret, when you realize it'll probably be another 60 years before you get that type of chance.

Just admit it, your arrogant attitude and arrogant AD cost Ole Miss football a chance to win a National Title.

There is no difference between Kiffin and Sumrall. The only difference is Tulane acted like an adult, understood it was business and still let him coach in the CFP.

Ole Miss fans like yourself are the ones who are morally bankrupt.

Not I-49 related but it's really dumb now for I-10 to go south into New Orleans just to go back up and rejoin it's original east-west routing at Baton Rouge.

Just have I-10 take the current route that I-12 has and bypass New Orleans. You could easily extend I-59 through New Orleans to take the current I-10 route.

There's already plenty of examples of this. I-95 goes around D.C. and Boston. I-5 bypasses San Francisco. I-75 goes around Knoxville and bypasses Tampa. This way the I-12 designation could be reallocated for future use anywhere in the U.S.