- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
MarquisHenri
| Favorite team: | TBD |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 19 |
| Registered on: | 3/22/2024 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: What will be the political win
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 11:27 am to moneyg
quote:Rob and Bob are a gay couple.
Negatively impacting your life is exactly what people like him (in large part) want.
Rob: "Bob, I don't really WANT us to get married, but it would really annoy the straights."
Bob: "I don't want to marry you either, but annoying the straights sounds like fun. Let's do it!"
0
re: What will be the political win
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 11:11 am to ctiger69
quote:It started with Loving v Virginia and has been all downhill since then.
Will anybody who previously support gay marriage admit it was a mistake ?
//:rolleyes: //
re: Ron strikes again. More Freedom from oppressive liquor laws.
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 9:36 am to BHTiger
quote:made me think of the SNL bit about “big dumb cups.”
5 gallon boxed wine!quote:
Suburban womenz rejoice!!!!
“Holds an entire bottle of Josh! Get in there Josh."
re: Trump Paid off NYPD Officer Diller’s Mortgage for his Wife
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 9:34 am to Born2rock
quote:It would be more fair to say that “there is no evidence that he has contributed anything toward payment of this mortgage.“
Trump never contributed 1 red cent. Just a PR stunt like everything he does for hype.
Unlike many Trump-generated instances of “hype,” he has not even claimed credit for this. It appears to be just a rumor that got started somewhere and then accepted as true by people who want it very much to be true.
re: Ron strikes again. More Freedom from oppressive liquor laws.
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 9:18 am to roadGator
quote:that is kind of wine you use for cooking or making punch, two applications in which you end up not really tasting the wine.
I’m not a wine guy but I can only assume that is nasty.
re: Big Ron squatters law in Florida first in the US outstanding .
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 9:07 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:He is just demonstrating that men do not have periods.
Governor Big Ron DeSantis Squatters law in Florida first in the US a blessing to keep the trash from invading citizens propertyquote:
You ever heard of a period?
re: Ron strikes again. More Freedom from oppressive liquor laws.
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 8:30 am to roadGator
1. The restriction on container size certainly seems to have been silly.
2. is this the point where someone says “sure is good to see Florida focusing on the really critical issues of the day.”
2. is this the point where someone says “sure is good to see Florida focusing on the really critical issues of the day.”
re: Big Ron squatters law in Florida first in the US outstanding .
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 8:28 am to roadGator
quote:no
You are a democrat, correct?
quote:and there are 49 states in which changes in the law do not directly affect you. That does not make it any less interesting to discuss them
Good news for you though. You will not be required to purchase property in Florida. The law will never affect you.
quote:And the patriot act passed the Senate by a vote of 98-1. that sort of vote does not necessarily mean that something constitutes a good piece of legislation. As often as not, it is an indicator of a knee-jerk reaction to some traumatic event (like the murder of that lady in New York).
There wasn’t a single nay vote in the House or Senate
re: Big Ron squatters law in Florida first in the US outstanding .
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 8:14 am to Bard
quote:I am not “blaming” anyone.
don't blame the reactions of property owners and the legislature/governor, blame the a-hole squatters who created the mess this bill is intended to fix.
Maybe this “squatting” problem is real, and maybe it is just the latest “tempest in a teacup.”. We have certainly seen some nasty anecdotal cases recently, but I’ve not seen any data (one way or the other) to indicate whether that the phenomenon is a greater problem than it was a decade ago.
Either way, however, this piece of legislation just seems to have some problems, in that it tips the scale too much to one side in the balance between landlord and tenant rights in a disputed case.
re: Big Ron squatters law in Florida first in the US outstanding .
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 8:05 am to roadGator
quote:I will not argue that in some states the eviction process is more expensive and time-consuming than it should be. To my knowledge, Florida is not such a state.
this new legislation strikes me as a knee-jerk reaction and entirely one-sided.quote:
Why? This is a great piece of legislation considering the growing trend of squatting.
As a general rule, eviction lawsuits are intended to balance the rights of both the landlord and alleged tenant, until the merits of the case can be decided, including payment of interim rent into the court registry.
Feel free to disagree, but it strikes me that a process which allows for summary eviction of a person waving a copy of his lease at the sheriff is a bit more solution than is warranted by the problem.
re: Big Ron squatters law in Florida first in the US outstanding .
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 7:39 am to 1loyalbamafan
quote:If the defendant is a “broke arse illegal,” he will not have the funds to pay contractual rent into the court registry during the eviction proceeding, and he will thus be removed from the property. What is your point?
That is certainly an inconvenience to your other tenants, but you do eventually get paid.quote:
unless they are broke arse illegals.
re: Big Ron squatters law in Florida first in the US outstanding .
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 7:21 am to OccamsStubble
quote:Most places, you can have an eviction judgment in two or three weeks. The holdover tenant (defendant) can then retain possession only by paying the contractual rent into the court registry. That is certainly an inconvenience to your other tenants, but you do eventually get paid.
What if someone leases my beach house, which rents by the week, for 10K per week May 7-13, and I have a full calendar of renters all summer. I need the rental income to pay my mortgage. Now, my May 7-13 renter decides they just love the view, and wants to squat there until October. Without this law, maybe they do just that, and deprive me of my income and deprive my guests of their planned summer vacation, and my house goes to the bank because some dirtbag just liked the view.
That system is not perfect by any means, but it is something that has developed over a period of centuries as a practical solution to a complex problem. it tries to provide some protections to both parties, until the merits of the matter can be resolved.
By contrast, this new legislation strikes me as a knee-jerk reaction and entirely one-sided.
re: SBF's conviction and multi-decade sentencing is a sad day for the echo chamber
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 7:01 am to Godfather1
quote:Does every sane person not prefer documented evidence over wild speculation and unsupported opinion?
And what, if I may ask, is so fricking all-fired important about “receipts”?
re: Big Ron squatters law in Florida first in the US outstanding .
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 6:40 am to KiwiHead
quote:The perceived problem was that Florida law did not provide this sort of “near immediate“ relief. Property owners had to pursue a formal eviction lawsuit to remove people from their property.
Should not FL law enforcement have already been doing this? The law is all fine and good, but should not the cops and judges have already been doing this? Adverse Possession really should have only applied to long term occupants living on a property for long periods under very specific circumstances .
I just skimmed this bill, rather than reading it in depth, but it could be very problematic.
The property owner could demand that the sheriff remove tenant from his property, and it looks to me as if the sheriff would simply be required to do so, even if the reported tenant shows the sheriff a written lease.
The ACTUAL, contractual tenant”s only relief would be later filing a lawsuit for wrongful eviction. That private cause of action is all well and good, but it doesn’t put a roof over the heads of that family.
re: Trump appointed judge releases J6 defendant early in rebuke of DOJ warnings
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 6:27 am to CamdenTiger
quote:Not if there were four distinct instances of trespass.
4 trespasses? Wut, would that be quadruple jeopardy?
re: Trump Paid off NYPD Officer Diller’s Mortgage for his Wife
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 6:15 am to TDTOM
quote:Another what?
Great, another one.
Another person who wants to see fact rather than rumor? I would think that everyone would want that.
re: Non-biblical divorce has destroyed the nuclear family
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 5:51 am to Florida_Man1981
“No Fault” divorce makes sense when no minor children are at issue, but I have long questioned its wisdom when kids are involved.
re: Big Ron squatters law in Florida first in the US outstanding .
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 5:37 am to pankReb
The Florida Legislature just passed a new law, and DeSantis did sign it.
Bill Text:
LINK
Reporting: LINK LINK
The bill was filed all the way back in November, and it has just now worked its way through the process.
if a property owner contends that someone is “squatting“ on his property, he can “fill out a form“ and have law enforcement officials remove the “squatter” immediately.
It does not seem to apply either to actual tenants or holdover tenants. It creates a misdemeanor offense if a person in possession of the property presents a falsified lease or related document.
it does not seem to allow the sheriff to leave the purported tenant in possession, even if the reported tenant provides a copy of a lease. Instead, it gives the purported tenant a civil action for wrongfully eviction.
in other words, so long as the property owner signs a complaint claiming that there is no lease, removal is basically automatic. The person in possession seems to have no option other than “after the fact” lawsuit to establish that he was indeed entitled to possession.
Bill Text:
LINK
Reporting: LINK LINK
The bill was filed all the way back in November, and it has just now worked its way through the process.
if a property owner contends that someone is “squatting“ on his property, he can “fill out a form“ and have law enforcement officials remove the “squatter” immediately.
It does not seem to apply either to actual tenants or holdover tenants. It creates a misdemeanor offense if a person in possession of the property presents a falsified lease or related document.
it does not seem to allow the sheriff to leave the purported tenant in possession, even if the reported tenant provides a copy of a lease. Instead, it gives the purported tenant a civil action for wrongfully eviction.
in other words, so long as the property owner signs a complaint claiming that there is no lease, removal is basically automatic. The person in possession seems to have no option other than “after the fact” lawsuit to establish that he was indeed entitled to possession.
re: Trump Paid off NYPD Officer Diller’s Mortgage for his Wife
Posted by MarquisHenri on 3/29/24 at 5:26 am to stout
if Trump indeed did either pay this mortgage or make a charitable donation intended to do so, good for him. But did he? So far, all I have seen is speculation from a local reporter that he would be doing so. That sort of speculation tends to take on a life of its own. so, what are the known facts?
Trump was invited to attend the wake, and he did so. Biden, Clinton, and Obama were asked not to attend the wake, and they stayed away.
Tunnels to Towers (TTT) has promised to pay the mortgage. This is a solid charity, and there is no reason to think that they will not do so.
I have not seen anything official from either Trump or TTT, confirming the rumor that Trump is funding the payment of this mortgage.
I do not discount the possibility that someone started this rumor, with the intent of putting “public opinion“ pressure upon Trump to do so. What options would he have? A press release saying “I never agreed to this?“
Given Barbara Jones’ financial oversight role, would it even be possible for Trump to make this sort of charitable contribution/donation without court approval?
Trump was invited to attend the wake, and he did so. Biden, Clinton, and Obama were asked not to attend the wake, and they stayed away.
Tunnels to Towers (TTT) has promised to pay the mortgage. This is a solid charity, and there is no reason to think that they will not do so.
I have not seen anything official from either Trump or TTT, confirming the rumor that Trump is funding the payment of this mortgage.
I do not discount the possibility that someone started this rumor, with the intent of putting “public opinion“ pressure upon Trump to do so. What options would he have? A press release saying “I never agreed to this?“
Given Barbara Jones’ financial oversight role, would it even be possible for Trump to make this sort of charitable contribution/donation without court approval?
Popular
36
