- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
CornbreadFed
| Favorite team: | Georgia  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 193 |
| Registered on: | 4/7/2023 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: If travel ball had existed in the 1920s
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 8:09 pm
Stuart...
0
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 6:10 pm
[quote]Somewhere (not in Africa) a village has lost it's idiot. When your Mom eventually passes away (prayers) use some of her money to travel to Africa and learn something. Anything.[/quote]
I’ve been to Africa including Zimbabwe. It’s an amazing continent and I’d recommend anyone to go there....
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 5:53 pm
[quote]Hard not to be peaceful when you are starved to the point of death. Any energy you do have is directed towards the acqusition of food. Africa is sooooooo peaceful. When the majority runs out of Whites, they kill each other. Very civilized continent. Ask the Tutsi. Rwanda genocide: 100 day...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 5:29 pm
[quote]Then take Rhodesia. Having Mugabe run Zimbabwe for 40 years resulted in the breadbasket of Africa becoming one of the biggest famine stricken areas in the world, mainly because that corrupt fricker thought that just giving whites’ farmland to blacks would make blacks successful. Colonial...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 5:21 pm
[quote]Voters don’t always make the smart vote. They got independence and then a bunch of those nations went to shite afterward. Like Uganda. Queen Elizabeth or Idi Amin should be a no brainer.[/quote]
As shvtty as they might be currently, I’d take being independent over being a colony any da...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 4:56 pm
[quote]British colonies? Generally better under colonial rule.[/quote]
Then why did they vote to become independent lmao...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 4:22 pm
[quote]Facts that will fall on deaf ears of the apologists. I posted factual links and will now exit this thread and watch them turn flips in denial. Not worth the time to argue with the low IQ idiots.[/quote]
You posted conspiritard links from your hilly Billy bunker in bum frick TN....
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 3:43 pm
[quote]WHY? "Apartheid...." Guess what? Apartheid is back. Whites are being raped, tortured, murdered, and their land taken. Silence from the leftists and the liberals. I have a friend from South Africa. He now lives in Scotland. He left SA after two home invasion robberies. The second one h...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 3:20 pm
[quote]South Africa went the same way. When they let that old terrorist, Mandela, into power. South Africa went from being a vibrant, thriving, advanced nation to a violent ghetto in less than a decade. Rape Capital of the World. [/quote]
The country was literally verge of a civil war. It’s a ba...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 3:14 pm
[quote]Where I live it's about a 90% chance to be a young black male, 13-19 years old looking for guns. It's damn near a daily thread for some neighborhoods on Nextdoor with video. I see the occasionally white junkie video too but they seem to steal people's lawnmowers and stuff like that. I guess...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 3:00 pm
[quote]Many geonocides/ ethnocide were carried out in Europe within the last century & some perpetrators/ victims are still alive. [/quote]
Europe was a shvthole to the point of exporting the most humans out of shvtty situations until the US bailed them out after WW2....
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 2:24 pm
[quote]You must not keep up with the carjacking and break-in trends if you think you’re making some kind of point[/quote]
So up to date with the latest trends and statistics, but incapable of answering a basic question....
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 2:19 pm
[quote]Statistic ain't lying. If you have a problem with facts and statistics that's on you.[/quote]
How about you quit being a racist pvssy and answer my question. Who do you think is more likely to break in to your car? Obama’s kid or a poor white guy on meth?...
re: OT Historians - Where Was Japan Getting Their Oil from During WWII?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 2:14 pm
[quote]That’s just plain stupid. Without Lend Lease the Russians would have been steamrolled.[/quote]
Yet they were winning before Lend Lease took effect? Stop choking on the anti Ivan bandwagon dildo...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 2:02 pm
[quote]Well I’ve spent years on the continent in dozens of cities spread across about 8 different countries and yes it’s corrupt.[/quote]
And Nola isn’t?...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 1:56 pm
[quote]There are probably a few cities in Africa more dangerous than NOLA. But even NOLA has better infrastructure than nearly any city in Africa. Africa is incredibly corrupt, that’s not really debatable.[/quote]
Really because Every African city I have visited proved this statement false?...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 1:54 pm
[quote]Still not nearly as violent as the South. [/quote]
Gang violence in specific areas yes, but, it’s not like the residents of Mandeville are being terrorized on a daily basis. ...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 1:50 pm
[quote]Most places in Africa are infinitely safer than NOLA. But there are also much more dangerous places than NOLA in Africa.[/quote]
Yes because we are comparing a continent to a city....
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 1:45 pm
[quote]Let's get specific and talk about Johannesburg, then. Africa is a giant continent and it is totally disingenuous to even group adjacent countries together.[/quote]
I’ve been there and I just used basic common sense. ...
re: Was sub-Saharan Africa better off under colonial rule?
Posted by CornbreadFed on 5/28/23 at 1:42 pm
[quote]Facts aren't racist. Black people have significantly higher violent crime rates than other races. Like 7 times higher. The reason a city like Boise is safe is mostly due to demographics.[/quote]
Who is more than likely to break in to your car? Obama’s kid or a poor white guy drugged on me...
Popular
9
