- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
OzarkTiger33
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 3 |
| Registered on: | 11/14/2022 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Greg Brooks medical emergency was on Thursday
Posted by OzarkTiger33 on 9/19/23 at 3:34 pm to barry
I don’t know your definition of a medical professional, but HIPPA applies to everyone who has access to protected medical information as an employee (or even volunteer) of a medical entity or as an employee of a company who does work for the medical entity. There was a case about five years ago in Iowa where a person who received information and used it was sentenced to federal prison.
re: Do y'all think CBK and Woodward lurk on this board?
Posted by OzarkTiger33 on 12/8/22 at 3:19 pm to Nutriaitch
To me this is actually the biggest concern I have with the Wade situation. I recall reading here (I have lurked for years) that the FBI was in town to talk with him the summer before Alleva was blindsided and knee jerked a suspension. Any organization the size of LSU athletics should have a competent PR department, which includes surveillance of public discourse about you. The way Alleva acted blindsided by the charges shows they didn’t conduct surveillance of this site, at least well. I see that as an admission from Alleva that LSU had a lack of institutional control as a leader with competent PR surveillance would have been able to say we have heard rumors of this and investigated. They would then have taken action before the season started or said we had heard of this and found no evidence.
re: When did colleges stop doing Freshman or JV Games?
Posted by OzarkTiger33 on 11/14/22 at 9:13 pm to Safety Blitz
A result of title IX. Schools introduced scholarship limits in ‘73 (105) to free up money for women’s sports and set targets for women’s participation. Scholarships were limited to 95 in late ‘70s and 85 in the early ‘90s. These limitations resulted in schools not having the number of players to field jv or freshman teams. Before the limits schools could bring in 60 first years and keep the best 30. That would mean 90 players in the top three classes for a varsity game. The drop in players is what drove freshman being allowed to play - though the Marshall crash accelerated it. Now Ivy League and military schools with no athletic scholarships, as they don’t have to worry about scholarship numbers, would be the most likely to still play. I would guess that the teams faded at differing times in different regions as schools decided they could no longer field teams.
Popular
1












