Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:172
Registered on:10/25/2022
Online Status:Not Online

Forum
Message
I don't know why Ohio St keeps running the ball when they seem to always complete their 20 plus yard throws. Playcalling is killing them.
"McElroy" in username. Takes backdoor swing on LSU..... Checks out
I don't know why they continue to run for tiny gains. It seems when they throw deep, they always hit.
So you and all the other downvoters want LSU to have a lot less NIL money to give to recruits thereby losing them like what just happened with Darron Reed?

Why would you not want the best possible option for LSU football? Ego?

Whether you choose to ignore NIL influencing players or not doesn't make a difference because it does. We might as well play ball if we want to reel in as best recruiting classes as possible.
I mean even like $100 from your 25 year old fresh out of college can help when it exponentiates. Is that happening? I don't have a clue.
I mean even like $100 from your 25 year old fresh out of college can help when it exponentiates. Is that happening? I don't have a clue.

re: Is Gordon the only guy we got?

Posted by geauxseph69 on 11/25/22 at 11:13 pm to
You know pre-NIL Gordon had an arguable distinction between who did and didn't support him, but after all of this NIL stuff, I think everyone loves him and what he's doing now. Pretty selfless for us the fans to benefit from. Hats off.
8/21 96 Yards 2 INT 1 Fumble 0 Passing TD

1 INT returned for pick 6. 1 Fumble returned for 6.

Against U High (Baton Rouge). I think UT is gonna get another Ewers.

You can tell Billy Napier probably grew up in a $40k/yr household where his parents probably fought/drank/dipped. You can't turn a child of that environment into a Nick Saban/BK. The white trash is just too engrained in him to be intelligent. Very much like Coach O. Coach O did get a nati, but really that wasn't him. That was just immense talent and good coordinators.
His daughter was my counselor at LASC, a summer middle school student council camp at Northwestern St. She went to Shreve. Everyone thought she was so hot.
He never had an edge. He just played really easy teams first 7 weeks.

What a Charlatan

Posted by geauxseph69 on 11/24/22 at 9:49 pm
*snaps fingers*
Every call was right. It's immature to throw a hissy fit when something correctly doesn't go your way.

Matt Austin explained why you could keep reviewing even in event of whistle.

re: SEC Shorts back at it

Posted by geauxseph69 on 11/21/22 at 8:40 am to
The main guy is way too forcibly corny and not funny. Lame really.
Josh Williams is better than Nick Brosette. O line may be the same or maybe worse now. We let up like 8 sacks to Arky and 7 sacks to Bama. Not sure about exact stats.

Oh Mason Taylor may be better than other, whoever was TE then. Moreau?
I watch probably 3 or 4 movies a week. I've seen probably 75% of movies on Prime, Hulu, HBO max, Peacock, and Netflix that are 7.0+ IMDb rating, made after 1975, and are in english. I'm looking for any suggestions. I'm running out of stuff to watch on these apps, and I'd rather not watch a bad movie.

Any suggestions would be helpful. I feel this would be a great place to ask this. If I were to just ask coworkers, they'd probably just say the mainstream, yet great, movies like Fight Club or Inception that everyone has seen. Thanks.
Single division is correct. You can divide by 1.

re: SEC leaning towards 1 division

Posted by geauxseph69 on 11/17/22 at 2:15 pm to
Single division is correct. You can divide by 1.
quote:

If we beat Georgia we are in.


That sentence leaves out the other part of this. You can say that, but add in the other objective part.

If we beat Georgia, we are in. Despite losing to the other competing team to get in and having 1 more loss.

That is the correct fully encompassing way to address this, and non-biased.
Simpleton respone.

If you're able to say that sentence, and then add despite us losing to the other team and having 1 more loss, then I'd believe you.

Say "Win the SEC, we're in. Despite us losing to the other competing team, UT, and having 1 more loss." Say that. As that's the case.
You realize ignoring things, doesn't make them go away. I'm not a troll. Just objectively viewing things.
You never in that response acknowledged that we literally lost to Tennessee.
It's a nice skyline, but very far from the most stunning.

That tall building is way out of place for a poor city with a metro population of 430,000.

To put it into context, Shreveport and Lafayette both have larger metro populations than Mobile. Shreveport has a 365 ft tall building. Lafayette prob doesn't even have a 200 ft building. Yet, somehow Mobile has a 745 ft building? Gotta be a bad return on investment on that one.
First off, TCU would have to lose for them to get in. That's not controlling your own destiny. 2nd, they have to count on LSU losing. 3rd, they have to count on, if 1 of the 2 prior things happen, that they wouldn't choose Tennessee or loser of Ohio st/Mich above them. USC has played no one. Look at their schedule. 15-36 is their Pac 12 opponent record. That's not an SEC 15-36. That's a Pac 12.. 15-36. Tennessee beat Bama and LSU. USC has beat Rice.

Now.. re-read your opinion and tell me you're right. Only way you could still do it is if your ego is too big to handle rational correct thoughts countering you.
Every response is leaving out the elephant in the room in their response. We lost to them. No one acknowledges it in the responses below. I want to preface this by saying I do think the SEC can get 3 teams in the playoffs. A lot of people are saying they don't think they can.

Georgia is in regardless from winning nati last year and their performance all season.

Comes down to Tennessee and LSU. The head to head loss and having 1 more overall loss, I think kills LSU. Winning the SEC championship and beating the team that beat Tennessee is massive. I just think there isn't anyway the committee can put in LSU when they have literally lost to Tennesse and have 1 more overall loss.

We're kind of fricked here unless the committee is willing to put in 3 SEC teams or somehow UGA and UT have an unexpected loss these last 2 weeks.
Even if LSU and TCU loses, Tennessee is still getting in over them. They're pretty much 100% locked in if that happens. He just said they control their own destiny. Tennessee who beat Bama and LSU. USC's Pac 12 opponents are something like 15-36. I think loser of Ohio St and Mich would stay in because they're at least playing a tiny more respectable opponents than Pac 12 imo.

On top of last week saying LSU has 0 shot of making playoffs.
Apparantly you can spell it both ways, but manikin is more science related dummys.
It means we have a manikin returning punts, like fair catches 100%. Basically what a manikin would do if it were back there.
I know it's absurd, but really do think he'd do better than whoever the hell it is that I just cringe each time a punt's in the air.

Mannequin as in just a body back there fair catching with no aspirations of gaining a single yard on a return.
CJ Stroud stats against Northwestern when there was a 33 mph wind, and I believe 55 degrees:

10/26 38.5% 76 yards 0 TD 0 Int

The weather Saturday was around 35-37 degrees with a 15 mph wind I belive. Wind chill was high 20's to 30. This is likely the last or only game of the season that will be like this.

I'm not as discouraged as others because the weather 100% has a massive effect on quarterbacks.