Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:104
Registered on:1/20/2022
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

(Lafourche Lake and Woolen Lake around Beouf WMA)


Dude, please tell me everything about Woolen Lake. For 20 years, I hunted spitting distance from that lake and always said I was going to go give it a try one day. Never did but think about that lake often. Google Earth makes it look white perch-y.
quote:

I’m in process of filling out application for Society of the Cincinnati.


This is a bigger deal than most on this board realize! I went through the steps as well, but it was only in doing the validation that I realized that my ancestor was a Captain in the Militia, not in the regulars.

For those of you who don't know, Society of Cincinnati requires you to prove direct lineage to an officer (and only an officer) in the Continental Army or Navy. That ancestor also had to serve for at least three years and/or til the end of the war. The really challenging part is that only one ancestor can represent an officer. So think of all your family and cousins that have been born from that veteran's line...hundreds in many cases...only one of you can join.

ETA: And their events are white tie formal, so you also have to know how to tie a bow tie for admission.
quote:

I thought the discussion was about whether socialism was good or bad, even in small doses.


If thats the discussion, then I would say that republicans think its good when it suits them (see Trump's recent announcement of $11B for farmers) and democrats think it's good when it suits them as well (welfare programs, COVID bail outs, etc.)
It doesn’t matter what I believe the cause to be. It matters what democrats and republicans saw as the solution. And in these instances, the solutions that had bipartisan support had were socialist concepts.

We can argue about the why. But the actions that were taken to address the impacts…at their core were socialist in origin.

This isn’t a partisan POV. This is calling a spade a spade.
I’d say that the continued existence of the American farmer, the US banking industry, and the airline industry is a good indicator of success. Again, I’m not saying it’s right or it’s wrong, but it is at its core a socialist concept.

And to answer your specific question (ignoring PPP loans, State and Local stimulus funding, EIDLs, etc) in addition to the airlines and airports, CARES Act provided financial relief to the livestock industry, hospitals, the DIB, higher education.
Well, the three I listed in my post are pretty good examples. I guess the bank bailouts occurred during the GWOT and Iraq but had nothing to do with the objectives of the war. The airlines have been bailed out a few times, most recently from the CARES Act. Congress has been authorizing crop subsidies since the 1920s.

quote:

Few of their policies seem feasible.


Many socialist policies have been feasible within the US Government for decades and continue to enjoy bipartisan support today.

I really don't understand why so many people on this board think that socialists are exclusively democrats. Trump himself was touting this $12B payment to ease the impacts of the tariffs, with an additional 11B on the way from Congress. Bank bailouts, airline bailouts, crop subsidies...all socialist concepts that have the support of Republicans. They may hold their noses when they do it, but they do it all the same. We can debate the concept of "well what choice do they have? Do you want the banks, airlines, farmers, etc to go under?" No, I don't. But putting the government finger on the scale when a free-market economy fails a certain industry is more socialist than not.
quote:

Is Trump a socialist?


I've been thinking a lot about this. Is Trump a card-carrying socialist who walks around talking about the benefits of socialism? Absolutely not.

Does he embrace socialist concepts at times to get himself out of political jams? Absolutely. Look no further than the proposed $12B onetime payment to farmers in the wake of tariff hikes. It certainly bypasses the free market. Not saying i agree or disagree with the tactic, but it certainly has the appearance of socialist tendencies.

And yes, Dumbocrats are guilty of this same thing and worse.

But I think the current strategy of screaming communism and socialism relies heavily on the American public not understanding either concept.
quote:

I'm curious how many other dark side IC snakes (Brennan, Clapper etc) could be charged in the same manner?


This is an extremely slippery slope. Mishandling classified information is done on the reg in DC and the most common offenders are actually members of congress. To some degree, the mistrust of the IC by congress...and I'm only speaking about the feelings of Congress towards the IC...not all of the national security experts on this board...stems from the IC withholding information that congress feels it should know. Trouble is that once congress knows, its typically a matter of hours before the rest of the world knows.

re: Tuberville and Veterans

Posted by Tiger Pants 318 on 6/24/26 at 11:27 am to
quote:

A Chamber of Commerce puppet is a BIG improvement


I'll have to do some reading up on why that is a bad thing.

re: Tuberville and Veterans

Posted by Tiger Pants 318 on 6/24/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

would be nice if the Alabama GOP could have come up with a better candidate.


I think Katie Britt should have run. She would have won in a walk and maybe gotten out of DC with her name still in good standing. That said, that seat she has on Approps is probably more powerful for AL than being the Governor.

...and she would continue Kay Ivey's tradition of being an absolute babe in office. :pimp:
quote:

A Trump EO could may have already removed red tape of home building and purchases.


This is true under normal circumstances, but I work in an industry that would have been HEAVILY impacted by some of the EO's that he has already signed. One for the better, one for the worse. What we've seen is that the EO's are simply just press releases. There doesn't appear to be anyone actually writing implementation guidance or following up to see that the intent of the EO is actually carried out. Even when you point the relevant agencies to the EO's on the White House website, they rightly point out that its nothing more than a press release without implementation guidance from OMB.
Really makes you wonder why Trump didn't fire Fauci when he had the chance.
No, I'm genuinely curious as to why people support this move. I see all the support for purging the staff. I just don't see any supporting arguments from anyone on why he is the right person for the job. I'm not looking to set up a debate, I'm legit curious.
Oh dude it was WAY more than $180M!!!! It was $600M that was appropriated for that purpose. Not arguing that.

The title of this thread is that CBP "funneled" the money to FEMA. If you want to use the term funneling in such a way, then say "US Congress funneled $600M to CBP who then funneled that to FEMA to then funnel it to state and local governments to then funnel those funds into contracts to provide sheltering in old hotels as required by law."

By this logic, all appropriated funds are "funneled".
I see a lot of people supporting Pulte's move here to purge ODNI of hundreds of staff and sure, I get that this board and millions of others are on board with thinning out the Federal ranks, rooting out deep state, etc. There is likely some merit there.

What I'm legitimately interested in hearing from anyone is a rational defense for Pulte being put in as Director of National Intelligence. Especially interested in the opinions of any of the active-duty service members or veterans out there.
quote:

They were living in luxury hotels, look up the news articles.


And having been to some of the shelters, I can tell you with 100% certainty that these hotels hadn't been "luxury" in a very long time.
This is all pretty misleading. This money was appropriated by Congress to CBP, who then transferred it to FEMA because they have the most experience administering Federally funded grant programs. FEMA then administered the money for the Shelter and Services Grant Program, which DID provide hundreds of millions of dollars to cities across the country (including NYC) to provide sheltering to undocumented immigrants.

It wasn't "funneled" by CBP and CBP wouldn't have the legal authority to use it on border protection. This was a congressional action that was implemented by CBP and FEMA.
quote:


I respect that he went.


I agree. I actually think Vance has had to answer for a lot of garbage that he didn't necessarily agree with, but he does it with a cool demeanor and measured response. The guy is smarter than a lot of people in the West Wing give him credit for.


...I also think he and/or his office leak like a sieve.

re: Screw Worm

Posted by Tiger Pants 318 on 6/16/26 at 4:04 pm to
I work with some ranchers who say that the last Screw Worm outbreak made for some really good cowboys. I guess the only way to stay on top of it was to stay in the saddle and check the herd constantly. There was apparently this ointment stuff that you could apply to the cattle that helped that smelled like hell. All the old cowboys I've spoken to said they can still smell it!

Unfortunately, this outbreak was not a surprise. You can even go back to Secretary Rollin's press conferences from a year ago announcing this and that as screw worm mitigation efforts. None of those came to fruition and the eradication method of releasing sterilized flies has been stuck for over a year. The USDA guy who went down to Mexico to assess the situation last summer came back and raised the red flag and was fired pretty soon after. This whole deal has put the cattlemen at odds with Secretary Rollins. Unusual dynamic for a USDA Secretary from Texas!
If this justice department had something solid to pursue on Newsom, I don't think they have the discipline to keep it quiet. They would either be shouting the allegations from the rooftops or doing the same through surrogates.

Dana Williamson (his former CoS) had some shady PPP stuff and she may serve time for that, but that investigation has been going on for over a year and if Newsom had his hands in that, this DoJ wouldn't have waited a year to go after him.