- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 26 |
| Registered on: | 1/28/2021 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
I accept the results of the 2020 election.
Posted by Xenos on 2/7/21 at 1:06 pm
I have faith in our institutions and so should you. The supreme is packed with conservative justices that Trump himself had a hand in (3 of the 9).
You don't always get the politicians that you want. And if you are a small government type, then the only positions you should about are local ones in your city or village.
If Rudy Giuliani and his team had this massive amount of evidence and the high-level legal acumen, surely they could have had the appropriate standing. The fact that 60 cases (not all proposed by Trump) failed is a sign that either the evidence is not sufficient OR they literally don't have the expertise they were hired for.
Presenting in Court IS NOT presenting on social media or news channels.
You don't always get the politicians that you want. And if you are a small government type, then the only positions you should about are local ones in your city or village.
If Rudy Giuliani and his team had this massive amount of evidence and the high-level legal acumen, surely they could have had the appropriate standing. The fact that 60 cases (not all proposed by Trump) failed is a sign that either the evidence is not sufficient OR they literally don't have the expertise they were hired for.
Presenting in Court IS NOT presenting on social media or news channels.
Welfare in Europe vs American. Cairn Study
It's a PDF download also.
Healthcare in the US (refers mostly to Covid 19)
Comparison of Healthcare
politifact Minimum Wage is US and other countries
It's a PDF download also.
quote:
Over the past century, Europeans have built
large welfare states, while the US has main-
tained a much less generous system. While
America spends about 11 percent of its national
income on social programs, France spends
almost double that amount; Nordic countries
spend even more. Relative to GDP, Europeans
spend more than five times what Americans do
on unemployment insurance and other labor
market programs. Not only European spend
more on social programs they also regulate
more in attempt more or less successful to
protect workers against business interests.
Labor market regulations are especially intru-
sive with rules like prohibition or high cost for
firing, mandate long paid vacation, short work
hours in a normal work week, generous sick
and maternity leaves, etc. For instance, most
European national governments mandate more
than 25 vacations days per year, while in the
US the federal government does not officially
mandate a single day free from work. The
amount of vacation is a private contractual
issue between workers and employers. Taxes
are not only higher but also more progres-
sive in Europe than in the US adding another
redistributive mechanism on the revenue side
of the government balance in addition to the
spending side. In Europe pension laws allow
early retirement, traditionally with special privi-
leges for public employees and women. It is not
unusual for men and women to retire in their
late fifties in Europe with full pensions. Some
countries are slowly trying to change these laws
but they find extremely strong opposition from
labor unions controlled by older workers and
pensioners. More than one European govern-
ment has fallen over pension reforms or had to
endure long periods of social unrest even for
relatively minor attempted reforms.
Healthcare in the US (refers mostly to Covid 19)
quote:
The coronavirus pandemic has resulted in millions of cases across the globe. The United States has one of the highest death rates due to COVID-19 across the world, and its mortality rates will likely increase. Due to different approaches to containing the virus across countries – as well as the quality and accessibility of health care – we may see diverging rates of mortality, disease burden, and other measures of health outcomes between the U.S. and comparable countries. This chart collection provides a baseline of how the U.S. already compared to similarly large and wealthy countries prior to the onset of the coronavirus pandemic.
Comparison of Healthcare
politifact Minimum Wage is US and other countries
quote:
THE FACTS NEWSLETTER
Enter your email
Sign up
What are you looking for?
Stand up for the facts!
Misinformation isn't going away just because it's a new year. Support trusted, factual information with a tax deductible contribution to PolitiFact.
More Info
I would like to contribute
15
Monthly
Join Now
Facebook posts
stated on September 26, 2014 in a Facebook meme:
Countries with a higher minimum wage than the United States’ $7.25 an hour include Denmark at $21, Australia at $15.81, Germany at $11 and France at $12.35.
truehalf-true
NATIONAL ECONOMY WORKERS FACEBOOK POSTS
A reader sent us this social media meme about the minimum wage, so we checked to see how accurate it was.A reader sent us this social media meme about the minimum wage, so we checked to see how accurate it was.
A reader sent us this social media meme about the minimum wage, so we checked to see how accurate it was.
Louis Jacobson
By Louis Jacobson
September 26, 2014
Do other countries have a higher minimum wage than the United States?
One of the most popular Democratic talking points this campaign season has been to call for an increase in the minimum wage. A social-media meme that’s been circulating recently provides a justification for hiking the minimum wage -- namely that the minimum wage in the United States falls well below that of other advanced industrialized nations.
Here’s the text on the meme, which Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., among others, put on his Facebook feed:
"Minimum wages around the world in U.S. dollars: Denmark $21/hr., Australia $15.81/hr., Germany $11/hr., France $12.35/hr. United States $7.25/hr. Share if you agree we should catch up with the rest of the world."
We wondered how accurate the meme was, so we took a look.
Using foreign-exchange rates
There are two major methods for comparing minimum wages between countries. The meme uses the most basic way -- using exchange rates to convert the wage amount from the foreign country’s currency to U.S. dollars. Using this method, the meme isn’t perfect, but it’s pretty close.
Australia’s minimum wage was recently raised to 16.87 per hour in Australian dollars. At current exchange rates, that’s $14.81 in U.S. dollars -- a little lower than the $15.81 cited in the meme, but still well above the United States’ rate of $7.25 an hour.
Germany recently established a national minimum wage for the first time, at 8.5 Euros per hour. (Previously, Germany had a patchwork of different rates.) That works out to $10.79 in U.S. dollars, not far from the $11 cited in the meme, and still quite a bit higher than the minimum wage in the United States.
In France, the minimum wage is currently 9.53 Euros, which works out to $12.10. That’s pretty close to the $12.35 in the meme, and it’s well above the U.S. minimum wage.
Of the four countries cited in the meme, the description of Denmark is the least accurate. There is actually no minimum wage in Denmark, according to a summary published by the U.S. State Department. According to that summary, "unions and employer associations negotiate minimum wages. The average minimum wage for all private and public sector collective bargaining agreements was approximately DKK 110 ($20) per hour, exclusive of pension benefits."
In other words, the Danish "minimum wage" of $20 or $21 is actually an average of all minimum wages across a variety of sectors. That means many Danish workers will be working in companies or industries that have a "minimum wage" lower than $20 or $21. And that undercuts the notion of a "minimum wage," which is supposed to be a floor for wages.
FEATURED FACT-CHECK
Jordan Rachel
stated on January 16, 2021 in a tweet
A $15-per-hour minimum wage would raise the price of a Taco Bell burrito to $38.
truefalse
By Bill McCarthy • January 20, 2021
So, using foreign-exchange rates, the meme is pretty close for Australia, France and Germany, and somewhat misleading on Denmark.
But that’s not the only method you can use.
Using purchasing power parity
Taking exchange rates into account takes care of one problem related to comparing one country’s minimum wage to another. Untouched, though, is the difference in the cost of living between one country and the other.
Definition of conspiracy theory.
What does this have to do with racism?
I understand that neither one of these accusations should be given lightly. And I find that one of the things hurting political discourse is that words are being planted by either side that inaccurately describes something.
For example, saying someone didn't achieve something due to bad grades or poor performance isn't racist. The question everyone needs to ask is this: is the result objectively valid given the current evidence AND was the process of reaching said result done in an equally objective way.
I can elaborate further if you wish.
I know exactly who you are referring to regarding conspiracy theories (MTG). QAnon is a conspiracy theory by definition.
quote:
a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event.
What does this have to do with racism?
quote:
prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.
I understand that neither one of these accusations should be given lightly. And I find that one of the things hurting political discourse is that words are being planted by either side that inaccurately describes something.
For example, saying someone didn't achieve something due to bad grades or poor performance isn't racist. The question everyone needs to ask is this: is the result objectively valid given the current evidence AND was the process of reaching said result done in an equally objective way.
I can elaborate further if you wish.
I know exactly who you are referring to regarding conspiracy theories (MTG). QAnon is a conspiracy theory by definition.
Sure go ahead. This early in the morning I didnt think id get a response back.
quote:
He may not have been perfect throughout his life. EVERY human being on this earth (including me and you) has not done things to where we can say I don’t hold any regrets to my past. People can change. I did the older I got and I don’t consider myself old just yet.
I honestly do not believe most people (Democrats included) expect perfection from anyone. The reason why Trump gets a certain amount of character assassination is not due to his actions, but the portrayal other people have given him.
There are those people (not sure if you are one of them) who treat Trump like he is the second coming of Christ, and I state that with little exaggeration. Certain people point out he defends Christianity, knowing that in the past he has had at least 2 affairs and cheat on his (at the time) wives.
I am not saying a person can't change. Anyone can ask God for forgiveness and do better. But at the same time, it isn't right to just pretend a person didn't do bad things because it is politically convenient. This is not to mention some of his other shady business deals (Trump University, Trump Casinos, Trump Steaks, etc).
quote:
What the forefathers did getting out of the European Model 250+ years ago so that we would not have to live under a one rule of government. Yet, we are now being dumbasses (almost a majority here in the United States it seems, wanting to adopt to go right back what the forefathers wanted to get out of which is the European Model). In the past four years Trump actually tried to prevent this from happening. Decisions voting left actually expedites this movement towards the European Model and many other countries with the Biden policies. The United States is being fused “or will be” in the next 15-20 years a one world government if we do not change the path we are headed under the current administration. Not a United States government, but a world government that is not controlled by We The People.
Again, I believe their is a misunderstanding being perpetuated by right-wing forces in the media regarding European government. Americans do not want to lose their Constitutional rights. They simply want the benefits that European and Nordic countries have. Our Western allies have a universal form of healthcare. A welfare program designed specifically for only those who desperately need it. Wages that keep up with the rate of inflation in their local economies. And heres the deal... contrary to right-wing consensus, none of the countries that have these programs are "Socialist" nor are they failing economically like Venezuela.
If you go by Fox News logic, then the U.K., France, and Germany are all socialist. Funny how they never bring those countries up in the conversation. Social programs with specific goals =/= socialist government.
quote:
Most (EXCLUDING a few countries China, Iran,) of the world looks at the United States to lead and be a example.
They do look at the U.S. to be an example. And plenty of them wonder why the U.S. is the richest country in the world, but doesnt have a system in place for the health care of its citizens. And no, I dont expect anyone to feel obligated to do something for me or others. However, your tax dollars are going to be taken regardless of whatever your political ideology is. And they will be used for whatever purpose the government sees fit, and as is often the case with Omnibus packages, it is spent on multiple things you are not going to like.
In other countries, they dont appease everybody, but they believe if they are going to get taxed anyway it may as well go back to the citizens in some form (healthcare, etc.)
quote:
Trump is not against The People whether you are Republican, Democratic, Liberal.
I believe this concern is born from the rhetoric he uses. You and many conservatives just tune out his rhetoric (for whatever your reasons are) but you can't expect some people to take offense or at the very minimum wish he was tactful in his approach.
Ill be the first to admit the media isnt always fair and for Trump they seriously went after him. However, some problems could have been mitigated if he just chose his words more carefully (like literally every other politician). Im not saying dont be honest, but dont give people a reason to attack you.
You or I, when out in public are accountable for what we say. Why is that off-limits for any politician, Democrat or Republican.
quote:
The thing that scares me most is the younger generation is being programmed how to not think for themselves. That is very telling of what the future may hold if we as a country, not change the course in which it seems we are headed.
I agree with this. The problem is that they are too easily influenced by celebrities and so-called influencers of the world. This has to lead to cultural rot as they believe they have to pretend to be like X in order to be something. We all know that celebrities live in leftist bubbles are what they sell is an illusion.
re: Rapper Pitbull issues warning about communism
Posted by Xenos on 2/6/21 at 7:35 pm to Crimson Wraith
No disagreement that Castro was a horrible leader, however, context is important and the government under Batista was anything but a peaceful republic. If anything it was just a banana republic for the US. But I have a feeling most of you conveniently forget that.
Sounds to me like both men were evil, just different sides of the same coin.
Fulgencio Batista
Sounds to me like both men were evil, just different sides of the same coin.
Fulgencio Batista
quote:
was a Cuban military officer and politician who served as the elected President of Cuba from 1940 to 1944 and as its U.S.-backed dictator from 1952 to 1959, before being overthrown during the Cuban Revolution. Batista initially rose to power as part of the 1933 Revolt of the Sergeants, which overthrew the provisional government of Carlos Manuel de Céspedes y Quesada. He then appointed himself chief of the armed forces, with the rank of colonel and effectively controlled the five-member "pentarchy" that functioned as the collective head of state. He maintained this control through a string of puppet presidents until 1940, when he was himself elected President of Cuba on a populist platform.[3][4] He then instated the 1940 Constitution of Cuba [5] and served until 1944. After finishing his term, Batista moved to Florida, returning to Cuba to run for president in 1952. Facing certain electoral defeat, he led a military coup against President Carlos Prío Socarrás that pre-empted the election.[6]
Back in power and receiving financial, military and logistical support from the United States government,[7][8] Batista suspended the 1940 Constitution and revoked most political liberties, including the right to strike. He then aligned with the wealthiest landowners who owned the largest sugar plantations, and presided over a stagnating economy that widened the gap between rich and poor Cubans.[9] Eventually it reached the point where most of the sugar industry was in U.S. hands, and foreigners owned 70% of the arable land.[10] As such, Batista's repressive government then began to systematically profit from the exploitation of Cuba's commercial interests, by negotiating lucrative relationships with both the American Mafia, who controlled the drug, gambling, and prostitution businesses in Havana, and with large U.S.-based multinational companies who were awarded lucrative contracts.[9][11] To quell the growing discontent amongst the populace—which was subsequently displayed through frequent student riots and demonstrations—Batista established tighter censorship of the media, while also utilizing his Bureau for the Repression of Communist Activities secret police to carry out wide-scale violence, torture and public executions. These murders mounted in 1957, as socialist ideas became more influential. Many people were killed, with estimates ranging from hundreds to about 20,000 people killed.[12][13][14][15][16][17][18]
re: Candace Owens Podcast on state of masculinity
Posted by Xenos on 2/6/21 at 6:14 pm to NineLineBind
I listened to it. I encourage you to do the same. They talk about more than just masculinity.
Matter of fact, in the last 10 minutes she discusses that women are partially responsible. She brings up multiple things women post on sites like Instagram and raises the point " are women giving men something to respect.".
I could go further but she makes many points that show that it's a problem with our culture in general.
Matter of fact, in the last 10 minutes she discusses that women are partially responsible. She brings up multiple things women post on sites like Instagram and raises the point " are women giving men something to respect.".
I could go further but she makes many points that show that it's a problem with our culture in general.
re: Rep. Tom Rice Latest Republican Censured By Party For Breaking With Trump
Posted by Xenos on 2/6/21 at 3:23 pm to IslandBuckeye
quote:
If he failed in your "pardon" criteria, too fricking bad. It has nothing to do with "yes men". It has to do with being a patriot.
You have already made up your mind.
What I am saying is that if Trump felt that an injustice was being done to those participating in the Jan. 6 debacle (sound better than insurrection), he had the power as POTUS to pardon whomever he saw fit. That not me being partisan, that's actually a fact laid out in our Constitution. He didn't do so because he simply did not see it as worth the effort. And that is perfectly acceptable, but be honest about it.
I use the term Yes-men because that is honestly the type of person Trump wants. You can argue the ethics of it, but it's not illegal.
Chris Krebs, Mark Esper, the " Resignation" of Aaron Burr. You could go on with the number he let go just because of a simple disagreement.
re: Rep. Tom Rice Latest Republican Censured By Party For Breaking With Trump
Posted by Xenos on 2/6/21 at 3:11 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
70% of the voters in Horry County voted for President Trump. The overwhelming number of voters here not only supported the Capitol protests, but they also didn't think they went far enough. Rice can vote his conscience, and the voters here in SC's 7th district will vote theirs. The problem with Washington is that nobody fears their electorate. A good dose of fear is a good thing for politicians.
If the protesters went further, it is very likely you would have plenty of more dead bodies than 5 (that isn't a threat, that just reality gave that it is federal property).
Most Americans do not see the Jan.6 incident as a joke, it is being taken very seriously with investigations still ongoing and while not everyone will get arrested, some already have. The only thing it really did was cement an already divided nation.
Also, why is it so hard to comprehend that you and/or your specific county may not represent the majority of Americans or at least have to reach a compromise in government. Instead of looking at counties, why not look at a total population of specific states to get an idea of political allegiance. 20 counties totaling 10,000 people are still fewer people than 1 million in 1 county. That's why anecdotes (even my own) need to be taken with speculation.
re: Rep. Tom Rice Latest Republican Censured By Party For Breaking With Trump
Posted by Xenos on 2/6/21 at 2:28 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
There's already multiple people lining up to primary him. The Horry County School Board chairman just announced his candidacy and one of our local state representatives from Socastee (the favorite if he runs) is likely to soon announce. Rice is gone.
And there all lining up to be Yes-men.
Perhaps it's two different philosophies. Personally, I don't want a politician who caters to everything I want. Because it means they'll do anything to keep their position, not necessarily do what's best for their jurisdiction.
Ironically, that is what Democrats do. They stand up for whatever is popular for their base, not concerned that what they support is actually bad for their base in the long term. Yet you all wish to go down the right-wing equivalent.
You all realize the GOP lost all 3 branches of power at the federal level.
If nothing else, I respect Rice for standing up for what he believes in.
Thanks for proving this point.
You all are more loyal to one man than you are to the principles of your party.
If Trump loved you as much as he claimed, then why did he not grant pardons to any of the "Patriots" who stormed the capital building on Jan. 6.
You're never going to get everything you want in politics or in life. At some point compromise is inevitable. And not one of these politicians would give Trump or anyone else the time of day if it didn't keep them in office. They care more about that position than you do about me or you. The moment Trump ever becomes unpopular or doesn't bring them what they want, they would turn on him just as quickly as Trump turn on his own staff
I remember when Barr, Pence, and everyone else in Trump's initial circle were treated as heroes. Funny how fickle the base has become since then. You won't even acknowledge that Trump doesn't even respect people he selected.
You all are more loyal to one man than you are to the principles of your party.
If Trump loved you as much as he claimed, then why did he not grant pardons to any of the "Patriots" who stormed the capital building on Jan. 6.
You're never going to get everything you want in politics or in life. At some point compromise is inevitable. And not one of these politicians would give Trump or anyone else the time of day if it didn't keep them in office. They care more about that position than you do about me or you. The moment Trump ever becomes unpopular or doesn't bring them what they want, they would turn on him just as quickly as Trump turn on his own staff
I remember when Barr, Pence, and everyone else in Trump's initial circle were treated as heroes. Funny how fickle the base has become since then. You won't even acknowledge that Trump doesn't even respect people he selected.
Rep. Tom Rice Latest Republican Censured By Party For Breaking With Trump
Posted by Xenos on 2/6/21 at 1:54 pm
Rep. Tom Rice
youtube video Tom Rice
youtube video Tom Rice
quote:
Of the 10 House Republicans who sided with Democrats on the impeachment vote, Rice was among the most surprising given that he had voted with the majority of House Republicans earlier in the month to object to Biden’s electors. He credited his impeachment vote to reports of Trump’s callous indifference to the plight of lawmakers during the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, in which Trump supporters attempted to stop lawmakers from affirming now-President Joe Biden’s victory.
CRUCIAL QUOTE
"I have backed this President through thick and thin for four years. I campaigned for him and voted for him twice. But, this utter failure is inexcusable,” Rice said in a statement following his vote to impeach.
CHIEF CRITIC
Rice told the Charleston Post and Courier that the South Carolina GOP “has forgotten its own creed that says ‘I will cower before no man save my God,” accusing them of “cowering before Donald Trump.” Rice also defended his impeachment vote, calling Trump’s alleged incitement of the mob who stormed the Capitol a “clear violation of the constitution,” and declaring, “I don’t care if the President that does that is Republican or a Democrat, I’m voting for impeachment.”
re: What a difference in 12 months
Posted by Xenos on 2/6/21 at 9:59 am to crazyatthecamp
quote:
We have a different administration in the White House and now there is military around it and the military is purging MAGA supporters.
Plenty of MAGA in the military. The only people they are going after are those with obvious extremists leanings. Think Stormfront and similar organizations. It's only those types. Why would you be in the military anyway if you have those extremists values, your setting up for disappointment.
The fact that you conflate this with anyone MAGA is disturbing.
quote:
Nguyener
What makes you believe that your perspective on these problems is considered 'normal'. Are you truly being objective or are you being politically biased yourself.
There has always been a ruling class, I won't deny you that. But a centrist view would be that extremists need to be removed on either side. Also, what is your definition of left-wing extremists. That is a loaded term and it's too ambiguous without context. The same can be said for right-wing extremists.
The other fact you need to consider is that evil is often pragmatism. A racist, terrorist, or any other bad actor isn't going to wear a sign saying they agree with those ideologies. They are smart enough to know how to hide those things behind certain words and actions. A common term used is 'dog whistle'. And it's been used by both sides over that past few years to the point of becoming commonplace.
If you take time to look at EOs, the Trump administration passed 220 of them. It was just more spread out in his 4 years.
Executive orders
If you truly want an honest discussion, try going to a more neutral website instead of just preaching to the choir.
re: House Judiciary Committee Democrats' vote against saying the Pledge of Allegiance
Posted by Xenos on 2/5/21 at 4:21 pm to LetsgoGamecocks
What is the purpose of doing this other than political posturing?
Everyone swore an oath when they took office.
Also, why are Republicans set on establishing a national religion when the Framers intentionally did not add one. The US is a nation of religious freedom. It shouldn't matter what religion you have so long as you do your job as pledged.
This only resonates with people who prioritize it or are ill-informed about religious freedom.
Everyone swore an oath when they took office.
Also, why are Republicans set on establishing a national religion when the Framers intentionally did not add one. The US is a nation of religious freedom. It shouldn't matter what religion you have so long as you do your job as pledged.
This only resonates with people who prioritize it or are ill-informed about religious freedom.
Technically everything they mentioned in that article isn't illegal.
It still doesn't outright prove that the election is stolen.
Factions of people who don't like you joining up to vote against you isn't illegal.
And dominion was never a problem until Trump lost. They will win their lawsuit against Giuliani and Sidney.
Trump lost because for as many people who like him, there were plenty who didn't or felt betrayed by him (he wasn't far right enough for some people). He basically handed white suburban areas to Biden which didn't help either.
Trump's style is a literal double edge sword, and most of you are too in love with to realize that
It still doesn't outright prove that the election is stolen.
Factions of people who don't like you joining up to vote against you isn't illegal.
And dominion was never a problem until Trump lost. They will win their lawsuit against Giuliani and Sidney.
Trump lost because for as many people who like him, there were plenty who didn't or felt betrayed by him (he wasn't far right enough for some people). He basically handed white suburban areas to Biden which didn't help either.
Trump's style is a literal double edge sword, and most of you are too in love with to realize that
re: MTG: The base is keeping list of these type of “R’s.”!
Posted by Xenos on 2/5/21 at 9:46 am to Seldom Seen
Problem is this:
How many of them are in safe districts or have loyal enough bases to hold them in office.
Politics at local levels can be much more nuanced (see Louisiana). They obviously get ire from the national party because they being pro Trump is the only way to hold office.
However, some people actually have standards (shocker..I know). And their constituency likes the politician enough that they will vote to keep them there.
If you notice, most of those states aren't the traditional south.
How many of them are in safe districts or have loyal enough bases to hold them in office.
Politics at local levels can be much more nuanced (see Louisiana). They obviously get ire from the national party because they being pro Trump is the only way to hold office.
However, some people actually have standards (shocker..I know). And their constituency likes the politician enough that they will vote to keep them there.
If you notice, most of those states aren't the traditional south.
re: MTG: I woke up early this morning literally laughing thinking about what a bunch of mor..!
Posted by Xenos on 2/5/21 at 9:17 am to Seldom Seen
The fact that so many of you have to to support a conspiracy theorist who literally would have been kicked out barely a decade ago says much about this board.
You are so desperate for anyone to to 'stck it to the establishment' , that you forgo the very ethics that conservatives stand for.
If you use the same tactics as your enemy then you are no better than they are. And instead of calling everyone you don't like a socialist, why not just win on virtue of your ideas alone.
I have nothing against the electoral college. But it says a lot when GOP haven't won a popular vote in literally 30 years.
You are so desperate for anyone to to 'stck it to the establishment' , that you forgo the very ethics that conservatives stand for.
If you use the same tactics as your enemy then you are no better than they are. And instead of calling everyone you don't like a socialist, why not just win on virtue of your ideas alone.
I have nothing against the electoral college. But it says a lot when GOP haven't won a popular vote in literally 30 years.
Sorry. I just realized you answered me already.
Having an health insurance plan is something literally every other western country does.
Calling people lazy is ironically the laziest way out of addressing what would become one of the new nations biggest problems. You immediately ASSUMED that someone would be in a situation because they simply don't work.
The reality is that most people work very hard and just don't make enough to pay the premiums. You ever wonder why it's a general consensus that the Republicans don't care about people, comments such as yours is why.
Calling people lazy is ironically the laziest way out of addressing what would become one of the new nations biggest problems. You immediately ASSUMED that someone would be in a situation because they simply don't work.
The reality is that most people work very hard and just don't make enough to pay the premiums. You ever wonder why it's a general consensus that the Republicans don't care about people, comments such as yours is why.
Then answer mine when have the chance.
What is the percentage of voters who support this secession?
Do you care about the future of the American GOP at a federal level?
It's obvious Texas can stand on it's own. The issue is can it secede as one state or will it split into 5. Or will it allow citizens to retain US citizenship.
What is the percentage of voters who support this secession?
Do you care about the future of the American GOP at a federal level?
It's obvious Texas can stand on it's own. The issue is can it secede as one state or will it split into 5. Or will it allow citizens to retain US citizenship.
Popular
35












