- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
BurbankStank
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Baton Rouge |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | LSU sports, saints football, Baton Rouge |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 16 |
| Registered on: | 10/20/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: How do you "borrow" someone's stock share and sell it?
Posted by BurbankStank on 1/28/21 at 1:43 pm to BFIV
quote:
In that case, why would I even allow someone to borrow my stock and sell it if I don't make a profit or suffer a loss? What's in it for me with my 3 shares?
The lending is mostly done by brokerage firms. They're not unlike a bank providing a loan. The person or firm that borrows the stock pays them interest plus maybe a transaction fee for the "loan".
re: Someone explain this Game Stop deal.
Posted by BurbankStank on 1/28/21 at 9:55 am to Rex Feral
To "short" a stock, you first borrow that stock from a lender. Party A lends a share of Game Stop stock to party B. In return, B pays some small amount interest based on the value of that share to party A until they return the share.
The next step is that B takes that share they borrowed from A and they sell it to someone else. So B now owes A a share of stock that B no longer has in its possession. If the price of that stock falls, B can buy a new share at a lower price than what they sold the original share for, give that share to A, and then pocket the difference. So if B borrows a $100 share and sells it, then the company tanks so that B can now buy a new share for $10 and return that share to A, then B has made $90.
This is very risky. The way normal investing works is that if you buy a $100 share, the most money you can possibly lose is $100 should that share become worthless. However, if you short a $100 share, and then that share skyrockets to become worth $1000, now you've lost $900.
The "short interest" of the stock is the ratio of shares that have been shorted to the number of publicly available shares. So if there 100 publicly available shares of a stock, and 10 of them have been shorted, that's 10%. If all of them have been shorted, that's 100%. Short interest of 20% is considered extremely high. But, lets say B borrows a share from A and sells it to C. The D borrows that share from C and sells it to E. And then F borrows that share from E and sells it to G. Now that one share has been shorted 3 times. In this way, it's possible for short interest to go above 100% (gamestop's short interest was 140%).
So if people notice that a stock is way over shorted, they might start buying that stock like crazy, which increases demand for it, and drives the price up. Well, all those firms that shorted the stock betting that the price would fall are gonna get scared and start scrambling to buy enough shares to repay to their lenders before the stock price climbs any higher. But then those firms clamoring for that stock drives the price up even more! That's called a short squeeze.
So basically a bunch of redditors noticed gamestop stock was over shorted, and so they started buying it in order to trigger a short squeeze. This caused the value of the stock to sky rocket, giving them a huge return on investment and costing hedge funds a fortune as they scrambled to buy shares to cover their short positions. Meanwhile, gamestop is still the same struggling company today that they were months ago.
The next step is that B takes that share they borrowed from A and they sell it to someone else. So B now owes A a share of stock that B no longer has in its possession. If the price of that stock falls, B can buy a new share at a lower price than what they sold the original share for, give that share to A, and then pocket the difference. So if B borrows a $100 share and sells it, then the company tanks so that B can now buy a new share for $10 and return that share to A, then B has made $90.
This is very risky. The way normal investing works is that if you buy a $100 share, the most money you can possibly lose is $100 should that share become worthless. However, if you short a $100 share, and then that share skyrockets to become worth $1000, now you've lost $900.
The "short interest" of the stock is the ratio of shares that have been shorted to the number of publicly available shares. So if there 100 publicly available shares of a stock, and 10 of them have been shorted, that's 10%. If all of them have been shorted, that's 100%. Short interest of 20% is considered extremely high. But, lets say B borrows a share from A and sells it to C. The D borrows that share from C and sells it to E. And then F borrows that share from E and sells it to G. Now that one share has been shorted 3 times. In this way, it's possible for short interest to go above 100% (gamestop's short interest was 140%).
So if people notice that a stock is way over shorted, they might start buying that stock like crazy, which increases demand for it, and drives the price up. Well, all those firms that shorted the stock betting that the price would fall are gonna get scared and start scrambling to buy enough shares to repay to their lenders before the stock price climbs any higher. But then those firms clamoring for that stock drives the price up even more! That's called a short squeeze.
So basically a bunch of redditors noticed gamestop stock was over shorted, and so they started buying it in order to trigger a short squeeze. This caused the value of the stock to sky rocket, giving them a huge return on investment and costing hedge funds a fortune as they scrambled to buy shares to cover their short positions. Meanwhile, gamestop is still the same struggling company today that they were months ago.
re: Trump eerily quiet
Posted by BurbankStank on 1/20/21 at 8:36 am to ezride25
quote:
Censorship will do that to a person.
If only the White House had some kind of office whose purpose was to convey messages to the press on POTUS' behalf. Some kind of Press Office.
Or maybe if there was a room where POTUS could brief the media directly. Like a Briefing Room.
Better yet, what if POTUS could address the American people right from the comfort of his desk in the Oval Office. Maybe they could call it an Oval Office Address.
re: Just like that—Chief Swamp Rat off the hook
Posted by BurbankStank on 1/20/21 at 8:16 am to NPComb
quote:
Day 1 - not just corruption, but blatant GFY patriots and middle class citizens and can’t do anything about it type corruption. Its being smeared in everyone’s face and it comes straight from the judicial system.
Trump is literally still the president. :lol:
re: They're calling Alabama's coach My Cousin Vinny
Posted by BurbankStank on 1/20/21 at 8:03 am to SpitzFan
quote:
The movie was released March 15, 1992, and it grossed more than $64 million worldwide, according to IMDB.
Also on March 15, 1992, Alabama men's basketball lost to Kentucky 80-54 in the SEC Tournament.
It must be some kind of sign! :rotflmao:
re: Sriracha Ketchup
Posted by BurbankStank on 11/3/20 at 1:05 pm to yaboidarrell
Isn't sriracha already basically sriracha ketchup?
re: Why is daylight savings time necessary?
Posted by BurbankStank on 11/2/20 at 7:01 pm to Lebowski
If it were dark until 9 am, there would be a lot more traffic accidents in rush hour every morning. There's always the option of staying with standard time year round, but people who like it to be light until 8:30 pm in the summer would complain.
re: Clever Republican strategy in PA
Posted by BurbankStank on 11/2/20 at 6:58 pm to Redbonebandit
quote:
Which means the totals for those counties, including in person, wont be submitted until all the mail ins, are counted, 3 days later.
But right in the article, it says...
"On Election Day we will report the poll numbers, but we have three days to start the canvassing of the mail-in ballot. So, we took the opportunity to focus our attention on the election at the polls and then we will switch gears the next day."
So the in person vote will be counted and submitted on election day. These counties, like others, are basically saying it's not practical for them to get all the votes counted on election day.
re: I feel so bad for Joe Burrow
Posted by BurbankStank on 10/25/20 at 4:19 pm to LSUstephen17
I haven't had the heart to check on him in recent weeks. Have they at least figured out some kind of pass protection for him? First couple of games, it honestly seemed immoral for them to send him out there to get hit every single down.
I don't foresee the Bengals building a championship team around him any time soon, but if they can't just protect him a little bit, constantly playing in shootouts because of the lack of defense could set up him to be even greater whenever he leaves that mickey mouse organization behind.
I don't foresee the Bengals building a championship team around him any time soon, but if they can't just protect him a little bit, constantly playing in shootouts because of the lack of defense could set up him to be even greater whenever he leaves that mickey mouse organization behind.
re: What is your state most afraid of?
Posted by BurbankStank on 10/22/20 at 10:08 pm to LoneStar23
Lol @ "HOLES"
re: "Zillennials" - the hybrid of Millennials and Zoomers
Posted by BurbankStank on 10/22/20 at 10:02 pm to karmew32
Generations always blur together. Different sources never agree about exactly what dates are cutoff between them. We always put too much stock in the idea.
re: Did I hear Biden say that Trump thinks windmills
Posted by BurbankStank on 10/22/20 at 9:59 pm to tiger91
Yeah, Trump did say that once.
EDIT: Specifically, he claimed that the noise from the turbines somehow causes cancer.
EDIT: Specifically, he claimed that the noise from the turbines somehow causes cancer.
re: If Biden wins, can he be impeached before he is inaugurated?
Posted by BurbankStank on 10/22/20 at 9:50 am to ksayetiger
Certainly the house could draw up articles of impeachment and be ready to vote on them immediately after inauguration. But dems control the house of representatives, and they will at least until the next congress is sworn in on January 3rd. And even after that, it's really hard to imagine a scenario in which Biden wins the presidency, but democrats lose dozens of seats in congress.
A "red wave" could see Trump win and republicans take back congress. A close election might see Trump win but dems retain control of congress. But it's very unlikely there would be a red wave in congress AND a Biden victory nationally.
A "red wave" could see Trump win and republicans take back congress. A close election might see Trump win but dems retain control of congress. But it's very unlikely there would be a red wave in congress AND a Biden victory nationally.
re: 2022 Hummer EV revealed with 1,000 horsepower - Would You Drive It?
Posted by BurbankStank on 10/21/20 at 9:15 am to goofball
Gotta admit. The t-top version looks like it'd be a lot of fun to go beach cruising in. And it'd be quiet too, nothing to drown out the sound of the waves.
Popular
0












