Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:57
Registered on:12/6/2018
Online Status:Not Online

Forum
Message
Tosh is taking the Cal job.

Give me Mark Stoops.
Tosh is taking the Cal job.

Give me Mark Stoops.

re: Muh negotiated settlement

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/10/25 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

So how would that work...he wasn't fired for cause. Can LSU now go back and try to find stuff? The Auburn shenanigans took place before they fired the guy. I'm genuinely curious how that works


Looks like they're firing him for cause after all...

LINK

re: Muh negotiated settlement

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

So now that it's not hypothetical ...


The contract is not hypothetical. Brian Kelly doing something to violate its terms is the hypothetical.

Again, the original question was: why are people arguing that LSU should “just pay the man”? Sure, LSU agreed to pay BK a huge amount to coach football, but if he hypothetically violated terms of that contract, why shouldn’t LSU use those terms to minimize what they pay him? I think we’re all on the same page that there’s no option to just arbitrarily refuse payment.

re: Muh negotiated settlement

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

So are you saying he violated this clause if it exists? Seems like LSU would have mentioned it. If he didn't...well, you agreed to it. Pay the man.


Yeah, that’s the whole premise. The question is: if you believe BK should fight for every dollar left on his contract (and for the record, I think he absolutely should), why assume LSU shouldn’t look for every possible way not to pay the full amount?

To be clear, I don’t know whether he actually did anything that violates his contract or justifies a “for cause” firing. But there’s been speculation that he may have breached morality clauses, and if that’s true, it makes sense for LSU to pursue the most favorable resolution for the university.

I’m not sure where the idea comes from that LSU can just “choose” to pay or not pay him. Obviously, if they don’t have legal standing, they don’t. We’re just having an academic discussion here as none of us are on either party’s legal team.

re: Muh negotiated settlement

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Yeah…well…that’s because…well…we hate LSU.


Well If there is one thing we can all find common ground on it's hating Brian Kelly

re: Muh negotiated settlement

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

I agree with you but it looks like they didn’t take the actions needed in said contract to do so. Tell the guy what he violated if that’s the way they want to go. You have to give him a chance to rebuttal.


See my other post but yeah I'm not arguing for not fulfilling your legal obligations. I'm just saying people seem to be giving Brian Kelly the benefit of the doubt and feel he should fight for everything he's owed while not holding that same perspective about LSU and the folks who are responsible for looking out for the school's interests - financial and otherwise.

re: Muh negotiated settlement

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Ok can you point to the language in the contact and how Kelly violated it? Thanks in advance


We're talking hypotheticals here. None of us have read the contract and all the morality stuff on here is purely speculative. My only point was that I don't understand the people screaming "just pay the man - you signed the contract".

Yours truly,
Free Drinks, esquire

re: Muh negotiated settlement

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

A contract is a contract. He is owed every dime agreed to in that contract.


I don't know if he did anything and frankly I don't care what we pay the guy but I don’t understand some of you. By your logic, since LSU offered Brian Kelly a contract with that buyout, they have to pay it while completely ignoring the fact that he agreed to a morality clause that gives LSU the right to avoid paying if he violates it. So, if that clause exists, shouldn’t LSU be trying to protect its own interests under the same contract terms just like Brian Kelly would if the situation were reversed?
Even with my 4th grade reading level I can tell that the BK buyout money would be better spent on iTunes gift cards for Sanjay in Delhi

re: Most Disappointed Fanbase?

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 3:21 pm to
Ill be the first to admit I thought LSU was going to be good this year. Had us as a sure playoff team. That said, Brian Kelly had made the team so miserable and not fun to watch that by the time the A&M game happened I was already numb. If anything I feel better about being an LSU fan today than I did 8/30. The sun is shining in Baton Rouge.
Weird BK apologist - embarrassing behavior
Look, I know Woodward made our bed and we have to sleep in it. That said isn't there a terrorist organization or Indian scam center we can give the money to so at least it's going to somebody more deserving and of higher moral character than BK?

re: Rumor on the SEC rant

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 2:33 pm to
Former college and NFL coach you say?

Serious question - in the age of unlimited analysts and support staff why are we still hiring position coaches who primarily function as recruiters? It seems obvious that the skill set required to get the the best players to campus and the skill set required to develop those players are two distinct things.
Not to beat a dead horse, but watching last night just reinforced how baffling it is that this team continues to struggle with the most basic aspects of the game.

How does a program with this much talent and experience consistently need to burn multiple timeouts because the play clock is running down? How do you end up taking a timeout to avoid a delay of game right after a delay of game? The false starts, missed blocks, and blown assignments aren’t isolated incidents they’ve become routine.

These are fundamental issues you expect to see from a high school team, not from a veteran team with championship-level personnel. It’s not a lack of ability it’s a lack of attention to detail, communication, and accountability. That points directly to preparation and coaching obviously.

For all of BK's talk about “restoring the LSU standard,” (which is even more offensive now that he clearly had no idea what our standards are except that the end of the Orgeron era weren't meeting them) the current product doesn’t reflect that standard. The talent is there, but discipline, focus, and execution are not.

Frankly embarrassing to watch week after week. Not my LSU.

re: Ban me but the ink is dry

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Lets analyze this. You are going to pay Saban some high price... whatever that is. You are going to pay Cignetti his current rate and you are going to pay Elko his current rate? That would be $50M/year or more. And what motivation do Cignetti or Elko have in making a downward move? Some critical thinking skills sould apply here. No clue if the Saban hiring is even a given.


Humorless Aggie is redundant but it's impressive how daft you have to be to reply 3 times in this thread trying to refute an obvious joke about hiring Cig and Elko as coordinators

re: Ban me but the ink is dry

Posted by Free Drinks on 11/9/25 at 9:04 am to
If this really goes through, Verge just locked the gate and next move: bring back Will Wade.

Jaray Jenkins to the draft

Posted by Free Drinks on 12/12/22 at 1:35 pm
[link=(LINK)]https://twitter.com/JenkinsJaray/status/1602385789312438272[/link]
1. UCLA (1)
2. Baylor
3. LMU
4. Omaha

1. Oregon St (16)
2. Creighton
3. Michigan
4. Cincinnati

Two Regional Winners: UCLA, Oregon St
Super Regional Winner: UCLA


1. Texas Tech (8)
2. Dallas Baptist
3. Florida
4. Army

1. Oklahoma St (9)
2. UConn
3. Nebraska
4. Harvard

Two Regional Winners: DBU, OSU
Super Regional Winner: OSU



1. Arkansas (5)
2. Cal
3. TCU
4. UConn

1. Ole Miss (12)
2. Illinois
3. Clemson
4. Jax St


Two Regional Winners: Arkansas, Ole Miss
Super Regional Winner: Ole Miss


1. UGA (4)
2. FAU
3. FSU
4. Mercer


1. LSU (13)
2. Arizona St
3. Southern Miss
4. Stony Brook

Two Regional Winners: FAU, LSU
Super Regional Winner: LSU



other side of Omaha bracket


1. Vandy (2)
2. Indiana St
3. McNeese
4. Ohio St

1. West Virginia (15)
2. Texas A&M
3. Duke
4. Fordham

Two Regional Winners: Vandy, TAMU
Super Regional Winner: Vandy


1. Louisville (7)
2. Indiana
3. Illinois St
4. UIC

1. ECU (10)
2. NC State
3. Campbell
4. Quinnipiac

Two Regional Winners: Louisville, ECU
Super Regional Winner: ECU


1. Miss St (6)
2. Miami
3. Central Michigan
4. Southern


1. Stanford (11)
2. UCSB
3. Fresno St.
4. Sac St

Two Regional Winners: Miss St, Fresno St
Super Regional Winner: Miss St


1. Georgia Tech (3)
2. Auburn
3. Coastal Carolina
4. Florida a&m

1. UNC (14)
2. Tennessee
3. Liberty
4. UNCW

Two Regional Winners: Coastal, UNC
Super Regional Winner: Coastal



CWS Winners:

1. LSU
2. UCLA
Fred's always has been and always will be my happy place. Those free drinks aren't going to drink themselves.

re: nevermind

Posted by Free Drinks on 3/10/19 at 8:08 pm to
Like others have said, good athletics drive applicants which in turn allows the university to be more particular about who they accept and drives academic growth. But more importantly, this was mishandled from the start. Suspending Wade does nothing for the University. Schools that have cooperated in NCAA investigations (there isn't one yet btw) have fared worse in terms of punishment than schools that have filibustered been uncooperative. He threw a wet blanket on what should've been a huge moment for us on national TV and only added to the media narrative. A good president finally should hire an AD he trusts and believes in and then leave the AD to do his job. If Alleva is incompetent then that falls on F King too.
Guy is senile but I won't lie and say I'm not looking forward to watching him clutch his pearls while we burn down the PMAC on our way to an SEC Championship
If anything it just continues to add fuel to the fire and let's ESPN put out another anti-LSU headline. Alleva and F King have so completely blundered this whole thing and the saddest part is not a single LSU fan expected them to do their jobs better than this. Its par for the course and an embarassment. Free Will Wade, Fire F King and Alleva, Forever LSU.
This is ridiculous. Had Alleva and F King done nothing we would be in a significantly more advantageous position right now than we are. All suspending Wade has done is add more fuel to the fire, we should've just shut our damn mouths, ignored the national media idiots, and carried on like business as usual.

On top of that, if we're going down then let's go down swinging. This has thrown a big ole bucket of ice water on what should've been a fantastic end to the regular season and a party at the PMAC. They have ruined the best LSU basketball season in decades and it's not even over yet. I'm appalled that the embarassments that are F King and Alleva get to speak for me as an alumnus of LSU
Something is not right here. Why would Will Wade's attorney advise him not to speak with F King and Alleva unless he thought F King and Alleva did not have Wade's best interests in mind? Love the sentiment from Mallett and the BOS by extension, but Alleva and F King royally fricked up by suspending Wade when they should've just kept they're traps shut.
But but but... Dick Vitale told us to suspend him....