TT1234

Until I read this thread my impression from reading the media and various economic articles was that China's economic growth was slowing to something like 6%. Now I know because Trinidad and Bamarep have said it that China's economy is near collapse and if they don't get a deal with the President there will be widespread starvation there.

I wonder when the fake news will add those guys as sources??

Labor on a steel building will probably be less and you can buy high wind loads that would be hard to build with wood. With the new tariffs on steel I am not sure the cost vs. wood.

I will point out one thing--when using steel height is cheap. A 20 ft eve height is not much more expensive than a 16 foot.

Mr. Trinidadtiger or BamaRep, what do you think the trade deficit will be with China in 2019?

I guess you can’t explain it. Sorry I upset you.

I want to see Mr. Azkiger post more facts to support his ideas than 90proof can post to support his.

They could do it at Sonic.

quote:

---

Who cares? Hey stop aid to Egypt for just 4 years there ya go. Good?

---

Yes. I wonder why he didn't tweet that??? Maybe he can end his new foreign aid bureaucracy he created too. He should tweet those things.

Do you think he believes his avid followers will believe anything???

Why would you say something like that about the President?? Is it because of his vague tweet that seems to be unfounded? Well unfounded might be an unfair word to use. Perhaps his tweet can be specifically explained by a better read audience than we have here.

quote:

---

Want me to keep going?

---

Yes please and some good links would be very helpful.

I was under the impression too that the 75% of NA requirement you speak of means US, MX or CA so I am not clear as to how this discourages manufacturers from building in Mexico. Can you clear that up for me? I think it means the cars cannot have more than 25% of components made outside the USMCA countries.

Anyway I am still not clear how this has anything to do with what the President tweeted about Mexico paying for the wall.

Do you think he exaggerates sometimes???

quote:

---

I find it funny that the same side who wants less taxes, more free enterprise and less government interference wants a wall which will cost more tax dollars, give the government more power and takes away free enterprises way of dealing with this issue.

---

Do you think the Trump supporters here are representatives of people who want less taxes, more enterprises and less government interference??

I must have the wrong impression from my months of lurking. I have seen the people on this board support everything Mr. Trump proposes including prosecuting private business they disagree with, imposing tariffs on American consumer in the name of protectionism, massive increases in government spending on the military and farm welfare and even the establishment of new government agencies like the Space Force and the IDFC (a foreign aid bureaucracy he supported starting with $60 billion.)

You know it just dawned on me the foreign aid President Trump intends on giving away with this new agency would build the wall. I wonder if he plans on offering the democrats a deal to scrape the IDFC and use the money on the wall??

I am not familiar with exactly what a "fricktard" is.

It appears I have upset you. I am fine with the wall.

President Trump in his tweet today talked vaguely about how the wall will be financed. Is he a "fricktard"?