User Avatar

YeauxKeauxEauxNeaux

Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:29
Registered on:4/14/2018
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Yeah, last time around they supposedly 90% of the way there for the better part of a year before turning it in and coming up short. This time they actually have a time limit. Can't drag it out for multiple years.

re: Well Libs

Posted by YeauxKeauxEauxNeaux on 4/19/18 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

It seems that all of you hopes and dreams have crashed.


:lol:

Good on ya, mate! If you keep telling yourself that, maybe you'll feel better.

re: Giuliani FTW!

Posted by YeauxKeauxEauxNeaux on 4/19/18 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

Not at all. You liberal retards, on the other hand, are like rabid hyenas and your sky screaming will only get worse. You freaks are some seriously mentally deranged P’sOS! Cheap entertainment is what you freaks are as well.

And go yourself.


Sorry, bro. I'll make sure to include a trigger warning for you next time. xoxox

re: Giuliani FTW!

Posted by YeauxKeauxEauxNeaux on 4/19/18 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

Another brainwashed, liberal, village idiot troll you are.


Uh oh, yall mad? :cheers:

re: Giuliani FTW!

Posted by YeauxKeauxEauxNeaux on 4/19/18 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

Is that honestly what you took from that?



Yes, and not just because he's a washed up old fart. He's also INVOLVED in this. His claim that he's going to get this all resolved in two weeks is more laughable than when Trump's lawyers were assuring him it would be over by Christmas last year. Mueller has the power and has every reason to subpoena Giuliani to testify before a grand jury about his time on the Trump campaign.

I mean, maybe Trump is just milking some of that GOP legal defense money for his old girlfriend Giuli, but if he's really counting on this guy to contribute, that's just hilarious.
quote:

They are pretty damning, but damning for James Comey.


:rotflmao:

re: Giuliani FTW!

Posted by YeauxKeauxEauxNeaux on 4/19/18 at 4:17 pm to
Jesus, Trump must have been turned down by even more lawyers than those we already know about.
quote:

I would say as of NOW he is not a subject or a target.


As of now, he is not a target. As of now, he IS a subject.

This was all covered a couple of weeks ago when it was reported Mueller himself told Trump's lawyers that Trump was a subject but not a target.

If you are a target, that means prosecutors are gathering information with the intention of bringing charges against you.

If you are a subject, that means that your conduct is being investigated and there has not yet been a determination regarding whether or not to bring bring charges against you.

Mueller told Trump's lawyers that he is a subject of the investigation. All this means is that that hasn't changed yet.
quote:

I know we're going on leaks here but apparently that's now looking like it may not be quite true (that he never went to Prague, the thing about the passport does appear true). You can move from country to country within the EU Schengen area without getting passport stamps.


Not only that, but he wouldn't even be the first Trump associate to be revealed to have multiple passports. I flew into Switzerland once and they didn't even stamp my passport, just scanned it. Plus, dude can't even keep his story straight. First he claimed he hasn't been to Prague 2001, before later claiming that he'd never been there in his life.
quote:

This is a procedural move.



And the most hilarious part is most Trump fans are completely oblivious to the eventuality that when the full OIG report comes out, they aren't going to like it much.
quote:

those entities would have corroborated to try and scrounge up material that they otherwise would not have to try and incriminate Cohen.


Is that a Freudian slip? Cohen is thinking about corroboration alright. He's thinking he's fricked because the evidence the feds have will corroborate the claims of the dossier.
This decision isn't one I feel particularly strong about either way, but reading the law, it is vague, so I suppose on the whole I agree with his decision, and I respect his willingness, at least in small matters like this, to rule based on his own judgement and not on politics.

But no, that doesn't mean I approve of him as a justice, and I certainly don't approve of the shameless tactics McConnell and Senate Republicans used to block Garland and make way for Gorsuch.
quote:

Ohhhh. I’m sorry. It was “””””an ally of Ms Clinton””””.


She ran, as a Democrat, for a seat in the Virginia State Senate, and she received donations from other Virginia Democrats. Wow... shocking. :lol:

No need to be sorry though. It's actually pretty hilarious how the hacks you must get your opinions from have you so worked up over it that you remembered it as if the donations were from the Clinton Foundation, an idea as ridiculous as it is false.
quote:

Just like Flynn and Manafort right?


Flynn already did.

Manafort may or may not before all is said and done, but he's in so deep and for so much more than just Trump stuff that he might prefer the security of federal prison bars lest he become known as a snitch and have to worry about his old buddies giving him the novochok doorknob treatment.
quote:

Did we ever get a direct disclosure from Andrew McCabe about his wife getting funds from the Clinton Foundation??


:rotflmao:

Probably because that never happened.
quote:

1.) Hannity doesn't claim to be a journalist.


And yet he gets all pissy and claims to have journalistic sources and break news every night on his show when Shep Smith says his show isn't news. He considers himself a reporter of the news with developed sources that he uses to bring information to the people. That's a journalist. Except of course when it suits him to not be a journalist, and then he plays, "Wuh... me... journalist?" card like a dope.

quote:


2.) Do you really think that the fact that Hannity used Cohen in some fashion for legal advice changed his opinion of the Cohen raid? Hannity is 110% Trump. Cohen is one of Trump's lawyers. OF COURSE he is going to be against it. Whether or not he had connections with Cohen, Hannity was going to come out swinging against a raid on ANY Trump lawyer.


If you're asking me if I think Hannity is a shill who bases his take on things around how well it fits his preconceived narrative, the answer is yes. And I'm glad you see it too. But I doubt Hannity would welcome that description of himself. He would claim that he isn't a shill but is instead interested in the truth. So it's kind of pathetic to give him a pass on being judged by that standard just because it's obvious to any thinking person than he is the hack to end all hacks.
quote:

Hannity is not a journalist and does not claim to be one.


He states that he's not a journalist when it suits him, but then he gets all pissy when Shep Smith says his show isn't news. Then all of a sudden he talks about all his sources and how he's breaking news every night on his show. If you claim to be reporting the news, then you're claiming to be a journalist. Just another example of Hannity trying to have his cake and eat it too.
Lol, what a dumb thread. If your point is that there are genetic differences on average between people of different races, got news for ya. No one has ever denied that, and you can find plenty more examples of articles discussing those differences that make that point better than this one going back many years. Did you just happen on this link while googling something and think, "I'VE SOLVED IT!" :lol"

Thing is, there are genetic differences between any two people. We aren't all our own race. There are average genetic differences between any two groups of people. But we don't consider French people to be a different race than German. You can often tell that a person is Italian or eastern european or whatever based on the way they look even, and yet they are still the same race. The classification of blacks, asians, whites, etc as different races instead of just different ethnicities is a social designation. There isn't some big genetic difference that demands that they be classified as a different race for scientific reasons.
quote:

Hannity doesn't consider himself a client but Cohen does. Hannity is free to waive the privilege.


But, of course, Hannity didn't waive the privilege. And, in fact, according to Cohen's lawyer, Hannity instructed him to immediately appeal if the judge ordered his name be revealed. If Hannity were to waive privilege, of course, one of the things that would be revealed is that he did have dealings with Cohen, so in wanting it to be kept secret, he was absolutely asserting his privilege.

Not to mention that Hannity is at the same time claiming that he never paid Cohen, but also saying, "I may have slipped him $10 to establish Attorney Client privilege" like a scene out of Breaking Bad or some shite.

Obviously, the fact that Hannity didn't disclose his relationship with Cohen despite knowing full well that documents regarding his own dealings with Cohen may well have been included in those seized during the raid is tantamount to journalistic malpractice. But unless the nature of those documents is particular damaging or embarrassing to Hannity personally, I don't understand why he's running scared like he is. Did he honestly think Fox News was going to give him shite for shilling on the air for his own attorney?
quote:

Dumbass, I would imagine that she did and this was a group effort, but trump backtracked , making her look like the idiot. No sane person would believe Haley conceived the terms of the santions and enacted/ announced them herself.



You're right. And in fact, the administration provided talking points to the RNC, which the RNC in turn provided to the press, which specifically mentioned the sanctions Haley announced.

God, it's so uncomfortable watching these Trumpkins degrade themselves by doing this mental contortionist routine to justify their devotion to Vlad's whipping boy in Washington.