- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
fgggg50
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 17 |
| Registered on: | 11/6/2015 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Forum
Message
On which website do you find that graphic?
Displays differently than my version of slot the station.
Displays differently than my version of slot the station.
re: Should I eat cereal or ramen?
Posted by fgggg50 on 6/22/20 at 9:30 pm to hendersonshands
get you that purple rice/drank
re: Inspection sticker losing adhesion
Posted by fgggg50 on 5/20/20 at 9:00 pm to Clint Eastwood

I think you hit the nail on the head. Reasonable measures to prevent spread, with a more-compliant and healthier population:
"Only 3.6 percent of Japanese have a body mass index (BMI) over 30, which is the international standard for obesity, whereas 32.0 percent of Americans do. A total of 66.5 percent of Americans have a BMI over 25, making them overweight, but only 24.7 percent of Japanese."
Economic Explanations of Japan-U.S. Obesity Differences
edit: grammar
"Only 3.6 percent of Japanese have a body mass index (BMI) over 30, which is the international standard for obesity, whereas 32.0 percent of Americans do. A total of 66.5 percent of Americans have a BMI over 25, making them overweight, but only 24.7 percent of Japanese."
Economic Explanations of Japan-U.S. Obesity Differences
edit: grammar
Japan has a low rate of COVID 19 deaths
Posted by fgggg50 on 5/1/20 at 4:17 pm
Apologies if this is a duplicate thread. I did a search for Japan and didn't see anything in this vein.
So I was watching Contagion, and Tokyo flashed on the screen showing a population of 35 million plus. It got me to wondering how Japan was doing with this pandemic, as I haven't heard much in the news about it.
Fact check, from Wikipedia, "As of 2019, the population of Tokyo was estimated to be over 13.9 million, making it Japan's most populous prefecture. The metropolitan area is the world's most populous with over 38 million people as well as the world's largest urban agglomeration economy."
WSJ article "Japan's coronavirus cases fall sharply without compulsory measures"
The article might be behind a paywall.
Japan's stats: "Japan has reported 13,385 infections and 351 deaths, a death toll lower than in many U.S. states."
A caveat to that data in that Japan's testing rate has been low.
Japan's mitigation measures:
"Unlike many Western countries, Japan hasn’t imposed a lockdown backed with fines or other penalties. Instead, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has asked people to reduce their contact with others by 80% and encouraged businesses to reduce hours of operation or close. Restaurants may open but are asked to close by 8 p.m."
Japan has a land area of under 146,000 square miles, with a population of just over 125 million.
Tokyo population density is 6,158 persons per square kilometer.
New York population density is higher, 10,194/km².
Some food for thought.
So I was watching Contagion, and Tokyo flashed on the screen showing a population of 35 million plus. It got me to wondering how Japan was doing with this pandemic, as I haven't heard much in the news about it.
Fact check, from Wikipedia, "As of 2019, the population of Tokyo was estimated to be over 13.9 million, making it Japan's most populous prefecture. The metropolitan area is the world's most populous with over 38 million people as well as the world's largest urban agglomeration economy."
WSJ article "Japan's coronavirus cases fall sharply without compulsory measures"
The article might be behind a paywall.
Japan's stats: "Japan has reported 13,385 infections and 351 deaths, a death toll lower than in many U.S. states."
A caveat to that data in that Japan's testing rate has been low.
Japan's mitigation measures:
"Unlike many Western countries, Japan hasn’t imposed a lockdown backed with fines or other penalties. Instead, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has asked people to reduce their contact with others by 80% and encouraged businesses to reduce hours of operation or close. Restaurants may open but are asked to close by 8 p.m."
Japan has a land area of under 146,000 square miles, with a population of just over 125 million.
Tokyo population density is 6,158 persons per square kilometer.
New York population density is higher, 10,194/km².
Some food for thought.
re: Excel help request
Posted by fgggg50 on 2/16/20 at 2:16 pm to GeneralLee
This is a formula copied from a Google sheet tracking weight loss. Not sure if this will work, and I don't have access to excel to test it:
=IF(ISBLANK(A192), "", AverageIF(A$5:A192, ">"&(A192-7), B$5:B192))
the if conditions whether other cells in the row display, based on the column A value being filled in.
ISBLANK is the one that might hold a clue. Wonder if there is an opposite to ISBLANK, or a NOT ISBLANK argument.
=IF(ISBLANK(A192), "", AverageIF(A$5:A192, ">"&(A192-7), B$5:B192))
the if conditions whether other cells in the row display, based on the column A value being filled in.
ISBLANK is the one that might hold a clue. Wonder if there is an opposite to ISBLANK, or a NOT ISBLANK argument.
re: Colorized photographs of the attack on Pearl Harbor (78 years ago today)
Posted by fgggg50 on 12/26/19 at 9:17 pm to RollTide1987
***
re: ‘Just because I’m colourful doesn’t mean I’m not competent’ (NSFW)
Posted by fgggg50 on 11/30/19 at 3:44 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
Taleb's take: the individual who doesn't look the part is often more competent, having had to overcome bias due to their inappropriate image in the process of obtaining their station in life.
Surgeons should not look like surgeons
Surgeons should not look like surgeons
re: The Minimum Salary You Need To Be Happy in the Biggest Cities
Posted by fgggg50 on 11/28/19 at 7:47 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
This thread reminded me of this
High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being , Daniel Kahneman
Came up during a podcast episode where Shane Parrish interviewed Kahneman about cognitive biases: Putting Your Intuition on Ice, Interview with Daniel Kahneman
High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being , Daniel Kahneman
Came up during a podcast episode where Shane Parrish interviewed Kahneman about cognitive biases: Putting Your Intuition on Ice, Interview with Daniel Kahneman
re: Someone explain this math brain teaser to me
Posted by fgggg50 on 5/19/19 at 1:40 pm to castorinho
McNugget Problem UGA.edu
Similar problem, but for McNuggets.
From site:
"For any desired number if it is divisible by 3 it can
easily be made with 6 and 9 packs, except if the
number is 3 itself. If you can't use all six packs then
use one 9 pack and you can do the rest with six packs.
If the number is not divisible by 3 then use one 20
pack. If the remaining number is divisible by 3 then
use the above method for the rest.
If the number still isn't divisible by 3 use a second 20
pack. The remainder must be divisible by 3, in which
case use the 6 and 9 packs as above.
The largest impossible number would be such that
you would have to subtract 20 twice to get a
remainder divisible by 3. However, you can't make 3
itself with 6 and 9 packs. So the largest impossible
number is 2*20+3=43."
Similar problem, but for McNuggets.
From site:
"For any desired number if it is divisible by 3 it can
easily be made with 6 and 9 packs, except if the
number is 3 itself. If you can't use all six packs then
use one 9 pack and you can do the rest with six packs.
If the number is not divisible by 3 then use one 20
pack. If the remaining number is divisible by 3 then
use the above method for the rest.
If the number still isn't divisible by 3 use a second 20
pack. The remainder must be divisible by 3, in which
case use the 6 and 9 packs as above.
The largest impossible number would be such that
you would have to subtract 20 twice to get a
remainder divisible by 3. However, you can't make 3
itself with 6 and 9 packs. So the largest impossible
number is 2*20+3=43."
1/21 is correct. I erred when I said probability of first pick is 1/22. It would be 2/22 because there are 2 of each kind of sock in the mix.
That doubles everything, making the probability 2* 1/42 =2/42=1/21.
That doubles everything, making the probability 2* 1/42 =2/42=1/21.
re: Math guys- Statistics Question
Posted by fgggg50 on 5/6/19 at 9:11 pm to RandySavage
Edit. Used wrong value for first sock pick (1/22 should have been 2/22)
1. 2/22 * 1/22 = 2/ 462 = 1/231 (odds of drawing a sock from full drawer, odds of drawing that sock's mate after one sock has been picked)
2. 1/231*11 = 1/21. (sum the probabilities for all 11 pairs; probability is the same because there are equal numbers, 2, of each type of sock)
My Tutor Probability Sock Drawer Style
1. 2/22 * 1/22 = 2/ 462 = 1/231 (odds of drawing a sock from full drawer, odds of drawing that sock's mate after one sock has been picked)
2. 1/231*11 = 1/21. (sum the probabilities for all 11 pairs; probability is the same because there are equal numbers, 2, of each type of sock)
My Tutor Probability Sock Drawer Style
I am not an attorney, but I think this Article of the Civil Code applies to your situation:
Art. 688. Branches or roots of trees, bushes, or plants on neighboring property.
A landowner has the right to demand that the branches or roots of a neighbor's trees, bushes, or plants, that extend over or into his property be trimmed at the expense of the neighbor.
A landowner does not have this right if the roots or branches do not interfere with the enjoyment of his property.
source: LINK
Note that this article does not confer the right for you to remedy the problem yourself. Merely, you have the right to demand they be trimmed.
Art. 688. Branches or roots of trees, bushes, or plants on neighboring property.
A landowner has the right to demand that the branches or roots of a neighbor's trees, bushes, or plants, that extend over or into his property be trimmed at the expense of the neighbor.
A landowner does not have this right if the roots or branches do not interfere with the enjoyment of his property.
source: LINK
Note that this article does not confer the right for you to remedy the problem yourself. Merely, you have the right to demand they be trimmed.
Popular
3












