- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
JP_Tiger
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | BR |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 474 |
| Registered on: | 4/1/2015 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Baseball Game 1: Arkansas 4, LSU 5 | Final | TIGERS WIN!!!!!
Posted by JP_Tiger on 5/6/16 at 7:21 pm to liquid rabbit
Intentional walk in the first inning of the series with a "strikeout" pitcher? Paul is a idiot.
2
re: Baseball Game 1: LSU 7, Missouri 5 | Final | LSU TIGERS WIN!!!!
Posted by JP_Tiger on 4/15/16 at 8:45 pm to CheerWhine
Newman is good?
Weren't you the guy saying no one on our team would hit over 0.300?
Florida and Vandy are going to push our shite in
re: How LSU Baseball Coaches Have Finished Based on Postseason Expectation per Seed
Posted by JP_Tiger on 3/27/16 at 8:24 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Never said I wanted him gone.
A top 4 seed should win at least 1 game. A top 2 seed should win at least 2. I'm making the same assumption that the committee makes. A top seed should be able to go to Omaha and win something.
I edited my post and added that fewer would meet that expectation. But still many would meet theirs. Regional hosts who weren't seeds and lost in the super. They met expectations. If they make it to the CWS, they've done better than projected already.
I'm trying to be fair but you're not really convincing me that my Epectation column is off based on seed. I'm willing to change it though if you have any more arguments.
I edited my post and added that fewer would meet that expectation. But still many would meet theirs. Regional hosts who weren't seeds and lost in the super. They met expectations. If they make it to the CWS, they've done better than projected already.
I'm trying to be fair but you're not really convincing me that my Epectation column is off based on seed. I'm willing to change it though if you have any more arguments.
27 of 56 national seeds made the CWS in the last 7 years. So about half underachieve. More than that now that I think about it if one of the top 4 seeds didn't win a game. I didn't go back and look that closely. But that would mean 29 teams overachieved to get there. What's your point?
How LSU Baseball Coaches Have Finished Based on Postseason Expectation per Seed
Posted by JP_Tiger on 3/27/16 at 7:41 pm
Disclaimer: This focuses ONLY on the postseason. Obviously, the regular season matters overall because it dictates how we start the postseason. But this is taking a look at how we've done once we are put in our place. Do we over perform? Meet that expectation from the committee? Or underachieve?
re: LSU's Newest Pitcher, LHP John Valek (Akron Transfer, eligible immediately)
Posted by JP_Tiger on 3/23/16 at 3:04 pm to LSURussian
What are you talking about?
Did you originally predict pitching?
Of the offense, you weren't close on most of them. And not that close on the record. 2.5 games off on SEC was your closest guess.
What do you expect though is my point. You predict things. Seem to be wrong often. Yet tout yourself as some genius when you're right, literally saying "Look at me!"
How much time do you spend on all these threads?
Of the offense, you weren't close on most of them. And not that close on the record. 2.5 games off on SEC was your closest guess.
What do you expect though is my point. You predict things. Seem to be wrong often. Yet tout yourself as some genius when you're right, literally saying "Look at me!"
How much time do you spend on all these threads?
I'd like to see your predictions for last year and how close they are. Got a link?
Seems to me like you put a target on your back by claiming to be right so often when you obviously don't have a clue. :dunno:
re: Time to print the pink slips
Posted by JP_Tiger on 3/19/16 at 10:55 pm to Tigahs1977
Of course it does. At least the coaching. Where did I say that? But when both teams experience it, how does that mean it's a reason one team underperforms? And in today's games, how did it affect the outcomes? Seriously. How did it affect the outcome?
re: Time to print the pink slips
Posted by JP_Tiger on 3/19/16 at 10:47 pm to Tigahs1977
But it's not a reason you lose or a factor in how you play or the plays a coach calls. It doesn't play a part when the other team faces the same "challenges". Why even mention it?
Then tells what luck has to do with weather?
What happened was his team didn't hit with runners on base. Not sure what that has to do with the weather. What happened was Lange fell apart in the 7th half an inning after he decides to squander his team's best opportunity to score in the game by not bunting a guy to third. What happened was he gave up on the win in the 8th of the second game when down just 2 runs puttin in Bugg who has yet to show this year he can be reliable at all. What does the weather have to do with any of those situations?
re: Time to print the pink slips
Posted by JP_Tiger on 3/19/16 at 10:39 pm to Tigahs1977
Didn't realize Bama played in a different stadium. Carry on then.
He didn't? Why did he bring it up in his list of excuses for his team's performance?
re: Time to print the pink slips
Posted by JP_Tiger on 3/19/16 at 10:30 pm to Gray Tiger
Mainieri just blamed the loss on the weather. That's like Jones telling the media his basketball team had energy
You listened to Mascona regarding baseball. That's what happened
re: Time to print the pink slips
Posted by JP_Tiger on 3/19/16 at 10:24 pm to Gray Tiger
You seem like an idiot. This sarcasm?
Popular
37
