- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Capitalist
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | Born in the USA |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 179 |
| Registered on: | 5/8/2014 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/26/26 at 2:05 pm to LSURussian
Yes. City of Baton Rouge is already bankrupt or very near to it and the Parish of EBR is not far behind. This is why the lower courts and 3 of the 4 justices voted against this City of SG from being able to happen. The only thing saving the city and parish from bankruptcy is the quick thinking by Mayor Sid Edwards and his administration and to cut about $15 million in unneccessary spending and over 400 city jobs from the payroll.
You guys call yourselves "small government Republicans", yet literally duplicated services and created an additional layer of government where non existed. Luckily Sid cut the cost where the new cost was created by voting in this colassal cluster frick.,
I am not saying that the city of St. George will not happen, or is happening, but it has no legal authority until it becomes incorporated.
The only reason 54% of the people in City of St. George voted for the city was because they were hoping to get their own school district like Central. And that is definitely not going to happen unless the Legislature changes the law because even if the State of Louisiana eventually votes to allow St. George to have their own school district (you can forget any support from New Orleans), the rest of East Baton Rouge parish will always outvote St. George everytime.
You guys call yourselves "small government Republicans", yet literally duplicated services and created an additional layer of government where non existed. Luckily Sid cut the cost where the new cost was created by voting in this colassal cluster frick.,
I am not saying that the city of St. George will not happen, or is happening, but it has no legal authority until it becomes incorporated.
The only reason 54% of the people in City of St. George voted for the city was because they were hoping to get their own school district like Central. And that is definitely not going to happen unless the Legislature changes the law because even if the State of Louisiana eventually votes to allow St. George to have their own school district (you can forget any support from New Orleans), the rest of East Baton Rouge parish will always outvote St. George everytime.
4
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/26/26 at 1:45 pm to doubleb
No, my friend, LRK LLC is barking up the right tree. This city has no legal authority to do anything until it is incoporated and that has not happened yet and cannot be declared retroactively. The date must be declared in advance.
You think this lawyer for City of St. George Andrew Murrell would have realized this back in 2024 when the Louisiana Supreme Court gave the city the okay. Obviously he not a very good lawyer and now he wants to be our next Justice of Peace? I don't think so. He not a very good lawyer.
:lol:
You think this lawyer for City of St. George Andrew Murrell would have realized this back in 2024 when the Louisiana Supreme Court gave the city the okay. Obviously he not a very good lawyer and now he wants to be our next Justice of Peace? I don't think so. He not a very good lawyer.
:lol:
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/25/26 at 12:04 pm to deltaland
That is exactly what I plan to do. But I want to take my property with me.
Thinking about calling my Metro Council Rep. Rowdy Gaudet to see if it not too late to annex in City of BR. Because I also don't like the way this City of St. George is headed. Too many Karens. I want out.
I know Rowdy Gaudet made the motion to annex many properties back in like September of 2021. And if St. George is still technically unincorporated. I want to get out before it too late and annex to City of BR like Women's Hospital and a few neighborhoods did in 2021. I do not want to deal with the expensive permit nightmare to come or have my commercial property downgraded to a lower class zoning like what is about to happen to the LRK Property if they lose their lawsuit.
Thinking about calling my Metro Council Rep. Rowdy Gaudet to see if it not too late to annex in City of BR. Because I also don't like the way this City of St. George is headed. Too many Karens. I want out.
I know Rowdy Gaudet made the motion to annex many properties back in like September of 2021. And if St. George is still technically unincorporated. I want to get out before it too late and annex to City of BR like Women's Hospital and a few neighborhoods did in 2021. I do not want to deal with the expensive permit nightmare to come or have my commercial property downgraded to a lower class zoning like what is about to happen to the LRK Property if they lose their lawsuit.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/25/26 at 11:22 am to UptownJoeBrown
Is it too late to have property annex to City of BR if City of SG is not incorporated yet?
Metro Council Representative John Delgado led a crusade to annex as much adjacent property to City of Baton Rouge before the incorporation of City of St. George could include those properties.
Since Incorporation has not happened yet. It is not too late for property owners adjacent to City of Baton Rouge wishing to now escape this City of St. George to now annex their property to City of Baton Rouge?
Technically these property owners can still annex their property without approval from City of St. George, since it is not incorporated yet and has no legal authority and an incorporation date can not be declared retroactiviely or in the past because the way La R.S. 33:4 is written the date "shall be" declared and the boundaries "set forth" - uses future tense.
Technically the boundaries have not been incorporated yet - meaning all of proposed City of St. George is still legally unicorporated.
Is the LRK LLC Property adjacent to City of BR? because if so, they should be able to annex to City of BR and escape City of St. George. And this would go for any other property owners wanting out of City of St. George before it too late.
Metro Council Representative John Delgado led a crusade to annex as much adjacent property to City of Baton Rouge before the incorporation of City of St. George could include those properties.
Since Incorporation has not happened yet. It is not too late for property owners adjacent to City of Baton Rouge wishing to now escape this City of St. George to now annex their property to City of Baton Rouge?
Technically these property owners can still annex their property without approval from City of St. George, since it is not incorporated yet and has no legal authority and an incorporation date can not be declared retroactiviely or in the past because the way La R.S. 33:4 is written the date "shall be" declared and the boundaries "set forth" - uses future tense.
Technically the boundaries have not been incorporated yet - meaning all of proposed City of St. George is still legally unicorporated.
Is the LRK LLC Property adjacent to City of BR? because if so, they should be able to annex to City of BR and escape City of St. George. And this would go for any other property owners wanting out of City of St. George before it too late.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/25/26 at 11:16 am to udtiger
They are suing for that. What do you think this lawsuit is for?
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/25/26 at 9:39 am to Knuckle Checker
Devaluing a property from $20 million to $18 million is $2 million.
City of SG owes them $2 million if they want to rezone to a lesser classification that takes $2 million.
I don't know about you, but for me, losing $2 million is alot of money to lose.
And I don't want your sympathy.
:lol:
I want property rights restored or justly compensated for the taking from an individual if it is necessary to provide for the greater collective by government.
City of SG owes them $2 million if they want to rezone to a lesser classification that takes $2 million.
I don't know about you, but for me, losing $2 million is alot of money to lose.
And I don't want your sympathy.
:lol:
I want property rights restored or justly compensated for the taking from an individual if it is necessary to provide for the greater collective by government.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/25/26 at 9:36 am to Knuckle Checker
Yes. They took value from that land by rezoning it to a lesser classification. If the government devalues your property, they need to compensate you for it. That is an illegal taking.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/25/26 at 9:24 am to UptownJoeBrown
Amazing how many people are okay with an illegal taking of property without just compensation, violation of Kleinpeter's 5th Amendment Right is a violation of everyone's 5th Amendment rights. Whose property will be taken next? or rezoned against their will next?
A government should not be able to rezone and devalue somebody's property without justly compensating for the worth just devalued by the rezoning of that property to a lesser classification. And yes, I realize this has been done before in this Parish by that moron John Delgado when he rezoned industrial zoned tracts of property along the river against the consent of the property owner. But that property owner did not challenge that illegal taking to court like the Kleinpeters are doing.
You diehard City of St. George Supporters are like the sheep in Animal Farm, uncritical masses who blindly follow and conform to the ruling power without question. Cheerleader for the pigs taking over your rights and property.
I have read online that City of St. George code enforcement walks right into private backyards without owner consent. Also read where a contractor had to tear out $5,000 dollars worth of windows because it had a transparency rating of .26 instead of .25 - or something like that. People replacing broken wooden fence with new wood being stopped because they did not have a permit and had to pay like $300 for a permit to simply fix their own fence, even though it replacement in kind. Nightmares you hear about in strict H.O.A. busy body Karen-Type neighborhoods. Which is fine if you agreed and knew beforehand and chose to live in Nanny State Type Neighborhood with strict deed restrictions, but not ok if you bought in an older established neighborhood from the 1940s to 1970s without such regimented control of your property or even, like me a property that is located outside and not part of any neighborhood with deed restrictions.
Again: I am going to state the following because it worth stating:
If an incorporation date has not yet been assigned, the proposed incorporation date CANNOT be set retroactive or set in the past. The order date has to be "set forth" in accordance with La RS 33:4 or at a future date.
Future tense is used in the law - "shall become"
The court must also consider Legislative Intent of the law, by the use of future tense in the verbage and the phrase "set forth" clearly indicated in the law, a future date must be assigned for incorporation, not a retroactive past date in 2019 or even 2024.
La R.S. 33:4 -
E.(1) If the district court determines that the provisions of this Subpart have been complied with, that the municipality has the capacity to provide the proposed public services within a reasonable period of time, and that the incorporation is reasonable, the district court shall enter an order declaring the date the municipality shall become incorporated. The order shall set forth the name and the boundaries of the municipality. Unless this order is vacated by a timely suspensive appeal, a copy of the order shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state.
So once the courts determined this city was allowed by order of the Louisiana Supreme Court back in 2024, the next step should have been for the Louisiana Supreme Court to remand to lower 19th JDC Court to set forth an official incorporation date or set that date themselves - which never happened nor has happened yet, and cannot be done retroactively.
So even if an incorporation date is announced in future. Basically everything this city has done for the past two years and three months since April of 2024 is null and void.
City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
:spank:
A government should not be able to rezone and devalue somebody's property without justly compensating for the worth just devalued by the rezoning of that property to a lesser classification. And yes, I realize this has been done before in this Parish by that moron John Delgado when he rezoned industrial zoned tracts of property along the river against the consent of the property owner. But that property owner did not challenge that illegal taking to court like the Kleinpeters are doing.
You diehard City of St. George Supporters are like the sheep in Animal Farm, uncritical masses who blindly follow and conform to the ruling power without question. Cheerleader for the pigs taking over your rights and property.
I have read online that City of St. George code enforcement walks right into private backyards without owner consent. Also read where a contractor had to tear out $5,000 dollars worth of windows because it had a transparency rating of .26 instead of .25 - or something like that. People replacing broken wooden fence with new wood being stopped because they did not have a permit and had to pay like $300 for a permit to simply fix their own fence, even though it replacement in kind. Nightmares you hear about in strict H.O.A. busy body Karen-Type neighborhoods. Which is fine if you agreed and knew beforehand and chose to live in Nanny State Type Neighborhood with strict deed restrictions, but not ok if you bought in an older established neighborhood from the 1940s to 1970s without such regimented control of your property or even, like me a property that is located outside and not part of any neighborhood with deed restrictions.
Again: I am going to state the following because it worth stating:
If an incorporation date has not yet been assigned, the proposed incorporation date CANNOT be set retroactive or set in the past. The order date has to be "set forth" in accordance with La RS 33:4 or at a future date.
Future tense is used in the law - "shall become"
The court must also consider Legislative Intent of the law, by the use of future tense in the verbage and the phrase "set forth" clearly indicated in the law, a future date must be assigned for incorporation, not a retroactive past date in 2019 or even 2024.
La R.S. 33:4 -
E.(1) If the district court determines that the provisions of this Subpart have been complied with, that the municipality has the capacity to provide the proposed public services within a reasonable period of time, and that the incorporation is reasonable, the district court shall enter an order declaring the date the municipality shall become incorporated. The order shall set forth the name and the boundaries of the municipality. Unless this order is vacated by a timely suspensive appeal, a copy of the order shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state.
So once the courts determined this city was allowed by order of the Louisiana Supreme Court back in 2024, the next step should have been for the Louisiana Supreme Court to remand to lower 19th JDC Court to set forth an official incorporation date or set that date themselves - which never happened nor has happened yet, and cannot be done retroactively.
So even if an incorporation date is announced in future. Basically everything this city has done for the past two years and three months since April of 2024 is null and void.
City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
:spank:
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/25/26 at 12:27 am to Capitalist
The lower courts were correct to deny the incorporation and in their assessment that this City of SG would have a negative impact on financial stability of City of BR while at same time unable to provide the crime fighting services it needs to provide for it's own city.
City of St. George has no court system and cannot afford to build a court house and hire the necessary people without significantly raising taxes. They have one employee managing their entire Clerk of Court for a city of 86,000 people.
Meanwhile City of Baton Rouge cannot afford to pay Hillar Moore or properly fund their District Attorney Office to prosecute hardcore criminals and prevent crime, while at same time provide the accused proper legal representation. City of BR cannot afford to properly fund the BR Police Department either.
The City of Baton Rouge should be filing for bankruptcy already. Not certain where the money is to fund the services they currently are providing.
City of St. George has no court system and cannot afford to build a court house and hire the necessary people without significantly raising taxes. They have one employee managing their entire Clerk of Court for a city of 86,000 people.
Meanwhile City of Baton Rouge cannot afford to pay Hillar Moore or properly fund their District Attorney Office to prosecute hardcore criminals and prevent crime, while at same time provide the accused proper legal representation. City of BR cannot afford to properly fund the BR Police Department either.
The City of Baton Rouge should be filing for bankruptcy already. Not certain where the money is to fund the services they currently are providing.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/25/26 at 12:00 am to Azkiger
Mayor Sid Edwards cannot lose the support of St. George Supporters, that is why he came out against the Baton Rouge Parish Attorney and Mayor Pro Tempore on this - to save face with City of SG Voters - who overwhelmingly voted for him.
Mayor Pro Tempore and Parish Attorney are positions that serve City of BR and EBR Parish, Not City of SG - so they are also doing what is best for City of BR and the people that put them into power.
Mayor Pro Tempore and Parish Attorney are positions that serve City of BR and EBR Parish, Not City of SG - so they are also doing what is best for City of BR and the people that put them into power.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/24/26 at 11:49 pm to tigeraddict
The only reason this city barely passed with like 54% of the vote is because people wanted neighborhood control of the horrible public schools in and near their neighborhoods. And that will never happen, because the rest of the parish will always out vote CIty of St. George voters from being able to establish their own school district.
People did not vote for more government control of their property or the mandatory H.O.A. this city is quickly becoming. They voted for more control of their public school system.
People did not vote for more government control of their property or the mandatory H.O.A. this city is quickly becoming. They voted for more control of their public school system.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/24/26 at 11:46 pm to CrystalPreserves
If an incorporation date has not yet been assigned, the proposed incorporation date CANNOT be set retroactive or in past. The order date has to be "set forth" in accordance with La RS 33:4 or in future.
Future tense is used in the law - "shall become"
And the court can consider the Legislative Intent of the law, by the use of future tense in the verbage and the phrase "set forth" clearly indicates that a future date must be assigned for incorporation, not a retroactive past date in 2019 or even 2024.
La R.S. 33:4 -
E.(1) If the district court determines that the provisions of this Subpart have been complied with, that the municipality has the capacity to provide the proposed public services within a reasonable period of time, and that the incorporation is reasonable, the district court shall enter an order declaring the date the municipality shall become incorporated. The order shall set forth the name and the boundaries of the municipality. Unless this order is vacated by a timely suspensive appeal, a copy of the order shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state.
So once the courts determined this city was allowed by order of the Louisiana Supreme Court back in 2024, the next step should have been for the Louisiana Supreme Court to remand to lower 19th JDC Court to set forth an official incorporation date, and unfortunately that never happened. And cannot be done retroactively either due to legal problems this would create and has already created as evident by this lawsuit.
So even if an incorporation date is announced in future. Basically everything this city has done for the past two years and three months since April of 2024 is null and void.
City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Future tense is used in the law - "shall become"
And the court can consider the Legislative Intent of the law, by the use of future tense in the verbage and the phrase "set forth" clearly indicates that a future date must be assigned for incorporation, not a retroactive past date in 2019 or even 2024.
La R.S. 33:4 -
E.(1) If the district court determines that the provisions of this Subpart have been complied with, that the municipality has the capacity to provide the proposed public services within a reasonable period of time, and that the incorporation is reasonable, the district court shall enter an order declaring the date the municipality shall become incorporated. The order shall set forth the name and the boundaries of the municipality. Unless this order is vacated by a timely suspensive appeal, a copy of the order shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state.
So once the courts determined this city was allowed by order of the Louisiana Supreme Court back in 2024, the next step should have been for the Louisiana Supreme Court to remand to lower 19th JDC Court to set forth an official incorporation date, and unfortunately that never happened. And cannot be done retroactively either due to legal problems this would create and has already created as evident by this lawsuit.
So even if an incorporation date is announced in future. Basically everything this city has done for the past two years and three months since April of 2024 is null and void.
City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/24/26 at 2:58 pm to udtiger
The Governor has no legal authority to incorporate a city. According to Louisiana Law R.S. 33:4 only the Courts can legally declare an incorporation date.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/24/26 at 2:53 pm to BugAC
The Kleinpeter Family have owned their land for well over 100 years.
Their land was zoned Commerical long before any of those Single Family neighborhoods started being built next door.
The Kleinpeters and their commercial property were there first before the residential neighborhoods were built next door by the "greedy" neighborhood developers. (Since most of you folks like to label developers as "greedy" people).
Their land was zoned Commerical long before any of those Single Family neighborhoods started being built next door.
The Kleinpeters and their commercial property were there first before the residential neighborhoods were built next door by the "greedy" neighborhood developers. (Since most of you folks like to label developers as "greedy" people).
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/24/26 at 2:48 pm to Capitalist
I do not support more local government control of my property. I prefer my property being located in unincorporated Baton Rouge, outside the City of Baton Rouge. Less government is better government.
I am amazed at how many self proclaimed "Limited Government -Conservatives" actually support more local government control over their property.
And it really sad these sheep who call themselves "Conservatives" support these government bureaucrats dictating how the Klienpeter Family can use their property.
The only point of forming this city was to regain neighborhood control over the local public schools - but that will never happen because the rest of EBR Parish will outvote City of SG voters everytime, even if the State of Louisiana votes in our favor, also have to obtain a majority vote of parish too.
:violin:
I am amazed at how many self proclaimed "Limited Government -Conservatives" actually support more local government control over their property.
And it really sad these sheep who call themselves "Conservatives" support these government bureaucrats dictating how the Klienpeter Family can use their property.
The only point of forming this city was to regain neighborhood control over the local public schools - but that will never happen because the rest of EBR Parish will outvote City of SG voters everytime, even if the State of Louisiana votes in our favor, also have to obtain a majority vote of parish too.
:violin:
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/24/26 at 2:33 pm to Guntoter1
I agree: City of St. George is definitely becoming a mandatory and impossible H.O.A. to deal with that i never agreed to. How can this city be undone? I don't think most people living here realize how disorganized this city is and that their permit office is so strict, I cannot find a contractor willing to work on my house because it not worth the hassle and expense (very expensive money grab) dealing with City of St. George Permitting office.
City of St. George is turning into Animal Farm by George Orwell, but the sheep keep saying this city is so great, wait until your property becomes a target or you are denied your property rights like the Kleinpeter Family that has owned their property for well over a 100 years. I want out of this city like yesterday.
City of St. George is turning into Animal Farm by George Orwell, but the sheep keep saying this city is so great, wait until your property becomes a target or you are denied your property rights like the Kleinpeter Family that has owned their property for well over a 100 years. I want out of this city like yesterday.
re: City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/24/26 at 2:24 pm to Capitalist
Maybe an attorney can answer this question:
If an incorporation date has not been officially declared yet by Court with juridiction to do so yet, can an incorporation date be declared retroactively? Or must it be set in the present or future only?
LA R.S. 33:4 States following:
"incorporation is reasonable, the district court shall enter an order declaring the date the municipality shall become incorporated. The order shall set forth the name and the boundaries of the municipality. "
The language of the above law seems to deny being able to set this date after the fact or in past. So if city is not incorporated yet, the incorporation date would have to be set forth or in near future and that would mean every legal proceeding taken on behalf the City of St. George would have to be thrown out prior to incorporation date, because legally City of St. George was not a city yet or had legal authority to do so yet.
If an incorporation date has not been officially declared yet by Court with juridiction to do so yet, can an incorporation date be declared retroactively? Or must it be set in the present or future only?
LA R.S. 33:4 States following:
"incorporation is reasonable, the district court shall enter an order declaring the date the municipality shall become incorporated. The order shall set forth the name and the boundaries of the municipality. "
The language of the above law seems to deny being able to set this date after the fact or in past. So if city is not incorporated yet, the incorporation date would have to be set forth or in near future and that would mean every legal proceeding taken on behalf the City of St. George would have to be thrown out prior to incorporation date, because legally City of St. George was not a city yet or had legal authority to do so yet.
City St. George is NOT incorporated, therefore is null, void and has no legal authority.
Posted by Capitalist on 7/24/26 at 2:11 pm
Due to a lack of order from any court declaring the date of incorporation, the alleged City of St. George does not actually exist.
Louisiana Revised Statue 33:4
E.(1) If the district court determines that the provisions of this Subpart have been complied with, that the municipality has the capacity to provide the proposed public services within a reasonable period of time, and that the incorporation is reasonable, the district court shall enter an order declaring the date the municipality shall become incorporated. The order shall set forth the name and the boundaries of the municipality. Unless this order is vacated by a timely suspensive appeal, a copy of the order shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state.
(2)(a) If the district court determines that the provisions of this Subpart have not been complied with, that the proposed municipality will not be able to provide the public services proposed in the petition within a reasonable period of time, or that the incorporation is unreasonable, the district court shall enter an order denying the incorporation.
The trial court denied incorporation on May 31, 2022 and therefore also denied an incorporation date. The 1st Circuit Court affirmed the decision of the trial court on July 14, 2023. The Louisiana Supreme Court reversed both decisions on April 26, 2024.
Notably, the decision of the LA Supreme Court did NOT enter an order declaring the date the proposed municipality became incorporated pursuant to LA R.S. 33:4(E)(1) above, nor did the Court remand the case to the 19th JDC Trial Court for further proceedings or orders, specifically. to enter an order declaring the date the proposed municipality shall become incorporated pursuant to LA R.S. 33:4(E)(1).
To date, the 19th JDC has not entered an order declaring the date "St. George" shall become incorporated nor has any Court in Louisiana authorized to make such a declaration or order of incorporation under LA R.S. 33:4. The uncertainty of an effective incorporation date by district court impacts the property rights to owners of property within this alleged city and proposed incorporation area and cannot be ignored.
Due to lack of lawful order declaring an actual incorporation date, this alleged "City of St. George" does not have lawful legal authority to do anything or currently exists.
Everything this alleged city has done since April of 2024 exceeds legal authority, is furthermore invalid, null and void.
:nana:
Louisiana Revised Statue 33:4
E.(1) If the district court determines that the provisions of this Subpart have been complied with, that the municipality has the capacity to provide the proposed public services within a reasonable period of time, and that the incorporation is reasonable, the district court shall enter an order declaring the date the municipality shall become incorporated. The order shall set forth the name and the boundaries of the municipality. Unless this order is vacated by a timely suspensive appeal, a copy of the order shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state.
(2)(a) If the district court determines that the provisions of this Subpart have not been complied with, that the proposed municipality will not be able to provide the public services proposed in the petition within a reasonable period of time, or that the incorporation is unreasonable, the district court shall enter an order denying the incorporation.
The trial court denied incorporation on May 31, 2022 and therefore also denied an incorporation date. The 1st Circuit Court affirmed the decision of the trial court on July 14, 2023. The Louisiana Supreme Court reversed both decisions on April 26, 2024.
Notably, the decision of the LA Supreme Court did NOT enter an order declaring the date the proposed municipality became incorporated pursuant to LA R.S. 33:4(E)(1) above, nor did the Court remand the case to the 19th JDC Trial Court for further proceedings or orders, specifically. to enter an order declaring the date the proposed municipality shall become incorporated pursuant to LA R.S. 33:4(E)(1).
To date, the 19th JDC has not entered an order declaring the date "St. George" shall become incorporated nor has any Court in Louisiana authorized to make such a declaration or order of incorporation under LA R.S. 33:4. The uncertainty of an effective incorporation date by district court impacts the property rights to owners of property within this alleged city and proposed incorporation area and cannot be ignored.
Due to lack of lawful order declaring an actual incorporation date, this alleged "City of St. George" does not have lawful legal authority to do anything or currently exists.
Everything this alleged city has done since April of 2024 exceeds legal authority, is furthermore invalid, null and void.
:nana:
When will City of Baton Rouge declare bankruptcy? My prediction is June-2026.
Posted by Capitalist on 1/19/26 at 11:02 pm
When will City of Baton Rouge declare bankruptcy?
My prediction is June-2026.
My prediction is June-2026.
re: Representative Paula "Pelosi" Davis stepping down - Thank God and Good Riddance.
Posted by Capitalist on 12/31/25 at 8:30 am to andwesway
Interesting...
Her husband has a weed business.
Did she vote against vapes and kratom? How about raising taxes on cigarettes?
Her husband has a weed business.
Did she vote against vapes and kratom? How about raising taxes on cigarettes?
Popular
42
